To give equal time however, we can argue that the Right wants to exclude as many of the 'wrong kind' (voting Democrat) out of the voting booth as they can. Unless you think that the Right is interested in this issue solely out of a sincere belief to protect the integrity of the voting process, regardless of how the vote goes.
Having said that, I am not opposed to a photo ID requirement, if the photo ID is readily accessible and free, so it does not act as a quasi poll tax.
No, I only want those that are entitled to vote, voting. And my polling place contains the precinct for a large college. For example, in referenda here in Illinois, if you don't vote on the question, then it is considered the same as a "NO" vote (or a "YES" depending how Mike Madigan chooses to have the question worded). Last spring we had lots and lots of college students voting. But many only voted for President/Vice President, leaving the referenda question blank (making it a "NO" vote). Others just checked the first box for each local office. Many voted to raise a local tax. (Because rich people need to pay their fair share, fortunately it failed). But with Bernie (and to a lesser extent Ted Cruz) off the ballot, we went from over 600 college students voting in the primary to 12 in the General. (they are all in one precinct.)
So I wonder how many voted in their Home of Record (residency) state, and how many did the Illinois same day registration/vote back in April last year?
I don't care who or how they vote. I just want them to:
1. Be citizens
2. Vote where they live. (and only vote once, because they have skin in the game that will affect them. )
For every other interaction with the .gov you need Photo Id that proves you are a citizen, why not for the most way you interact with .gov ??