Author Topic: Court strikes down National Park CCW  (Read 5097 times)

Angel Eyes

  • Lying dog-faced pony soldier
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,332
  • You're not diggin'
Court strikes down National Park CCW
« on: March 19, 2009, 08:44:59 PM »
Well, that's just peachy.   :mad:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29781541/

WASHINGTON - A judge on Thursday blocked a federal rule allowing people to carry concealed, loaded guns in U.S. national parks and wildlife refuges.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly overturns a rule issued in the waning days of the Bush administration.

The rule, which took effect Jan. 11, and allowed visitors to carry a loaded gun into a park or wildlife refuge as long as the person had a permit for a concealed weapon and the state where the park or refuge was located allowed concealed firearms. Previously, guns in parks had been severely restricted.

The Obama administration had said it was reviewing the Bush rule but had defended it in court.

A spokeswoman for Interior Secretary Ken Salazar declined to comment Thursday, citing the ongoing court case.

Restrictions adopted during Reagan years
The Bush administration issued the gun rule in December in response to letters from half the Senate asking officials to lift the restrictions on guns in parks, which were adopted by the Reagan administration in the early 1980s.

The rule went further than a draft proposal issued a year ago and would have allowed concealed weapons even in parks located in states that prohibit the carrying of guns in state parks. Some states allow concealed weapons but also ban guns from parks.

Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, one of two groups that sued to block the rule, called the judge's ruling a victory for the people.

"We're happy that this headlong rush to push more guns into more places has been slowed," he said.

Bryan Faehner, associate director of the National Parks Conservation Association, which also brought suit, said he was extremely pleased.

"We're especially glad to hear that the court is agreeing with the park rangers and the public who are concerned that there will be negative impacts from the (now-overturned) regulation and increased likelihood for opportunistic poaching of wildlife and increased risk of violence to the public."

NRA backed the Bush rule change
The National Rifle Association had pushed for the Bush rule change, saying law-abiding citizens had the right to protect themselves and their families while enjoying America's national parks and wildlife refuges. The previous regulations were inconsistent and unclear, the NRA said.

A group representing park rangers, retirees and conservation organizations protested the Bush rule change, complaining that it could lead to confusion and increased danger for visitors, rangers and other law enforcement agencies.

"End of quote.  Repeat the line."
  - Joe 'Ron Burgundy' Biden

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2009, 08:56:16 PM »
What was the judge's reasoning? Guns are icky? :mad:
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

stevelyn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,130
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2009, 09:07:29 PM »
You have to admire the Brady pukes' ability to find a sympathetic audience.
Be careful that the toes you step on now aren't connected to the ass you have to kiss later.

Eat Moose. Wear Wolf.

DJJ

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 828
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2009, 09:13:53 PM »
What was the judge's reasoning? Guns are icky? :mad:
That's what I want to know - not only on what grounds, but on what authority?

Standing Wolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,978
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2009, 09:21:51 PM »
Quote
You have to admire the Brady pukes' ability to find a sympathetic audience.

It's not really that difficult: the judiciary is packed to the rafters with leftist extremist "judges" appointed by leftist extremist presidents and approved by more leftist extremists in legislatures.
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,643
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2009, 09:48:24 PM »
That's what I want to know - not only on what grounds, but on what authority?
Good queston - exactly what existing law was the judge applying?
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2009, 10:05:15 PM »
She ruled against it based on a lack of a environmental impact study :mad: :mad: :mad:
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2009, 10:12:03 PM »
She ruled against it based on a lack of a environmental impact study :mad: :mad: :mad:

Hey Rocky !!  Watch me pull a rabbit out of my butt !!!
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,973
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2009, 10:21:28 PM »
Quote
The decision by U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly overturns a rule issued in the waning days of the Bush administration.

Hmmmm... hyphenated last name.

I wonder what political leanings she adheres to?

I also am certain that the plaintiffs cherry-picked their judge.  This will hit a higher Circuit court and get promptly smacked back on track.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

RoadKingLarry

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 21,841
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Samuel Adams

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2009, 10:22:28 PM »
Apparently there was not enough blood running in the streams once folks started packing.

Somehow I don't think we can lay all the blame on Fistful for that.

stay safe.

skidmark
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

K Frame

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44,386
  • I Am Inimical
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2009, 11:20:59 PM »
As I understand it, this is a temporary injunction, not a full toss.
Carbon Monoxide, sucking the life out of idiots, 'tards, and fools since man tamed fire.

Standing Wolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,978
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2009, 11:57:34 PM »
Quote
Somehow I don't think we can lay all the blame on Fistful for that.

Nah. Bush's fault.
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.

coppertales

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 947
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #13 on: March 20, 2009, 11:15:56 AM »
It is actually Regan's fault, he started it.  As good a president as he was, he was from KA........chris3

HankB

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,643
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #14 on: March 20, 2009, 11:58:40 AM »
She ruled against it based on a lack of a environmental impact study :mad: :mad: :mad:
So . . . does one need to file an environmental impact study for wearing shoes or pants in a national park?

If this idiot judge really did use environment impact to issue her ruling - she's the kind of lunatic moonbat that not only ought to be removed from the bench, she ought to be fined (for abusing her authority) and disbarred.
Trump won in 2016. Democrats haven't been so offended since Republicans came along and freed their slaves.
Sometimes I wonder if the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it. - Mark Twain
Government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction in stolen goods. - H.L. Mencken
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain

41magsnub

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,579
  • Don't make me assume my ultimate form!
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #15 on: March 20, 2009, 12:00:09 PM »
Nah. Bush's fault.

But I think he voted for Bush so it is back to Fistfull again

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #16 on: March 20, 2009, 12:01:43 PM »
Technically, it's Reagan's fault, but since Reagan is faultless and can do no wrong we blame Obama.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #17 on: March 20, 2009, 12:10:47 PM »
Technically, it's Reagan's fault, but since Reagan is faultless and can do no wrong we blame Obama.

He was governor of CA. We're lucky he only did national park ccw and the bad parts of FOPA. And God yes, yes I know the machine gun was snuck in at the last second etc. Geez....
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #18 on: March 20, 2009, 12:16:46 PM »
What, you doubt Reagan's godhood?

INFIDEL!
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

lupinus

  • Southern Mod Trimutive Emeritus
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,178
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #19 on: March 20, 2009, 04:02:24 PM »
But...but....but....Reagan was the awesomest bestest defeeter or ebil everrrrr.

Seriously, he was great, but like any he had his draw backs.

I'd still love to know under what authority a Judge imposes such a rule on national parks.  The rule was removed, there is nothing to sue for and no ruling to be made reinstating it.  Judges can uphold such rules, not create them.
That is all. *expletive deleted*ck you all, eat *expletive deleted*it, and die in a fire. I have considered writing here a long parting section dedicated to each poster, but I have decided, at length, against it. *expletive deleted*ck you all and Hail Satan.

AZRedhawk44

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,973
Re: Court strikes down National Park CCW
« Reply #20 on: March 20, 2009, 04:11:08 PM »
I'd still love to know under what authority a Judge imposes such a rule on national parks.  The rule was removed, there is nothing to sue for and no ruling to be made reinstating it.  Judges can uphold such rules, not create them.

Judges can get involved in rules situations, and we had best hope they continue to be able to do so.  It's the only way to get rid of firmly entrenched yet reckless rules.  Keep the ATF in mind when thinking about rules and regulations rather than laws, and the power of the judiciary to attack them.
"But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist."
--Lysander Spooner

I reject your authoritah!

longeyes

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,405
firearms in national parks - nyet
« Reply #21 on: March 21, 2009, 02:13:25 PM »
Who knew that the Second Amendment was trumped by environmental concerns?

In New America it appears to be.   Now what could those "environmental" issues be, I'm wondering?

I think a lot of us already suspect that environmentalism has become the calling card for socialism.  Or let's just call it Communism Nice and leave it at that.

Anyway...

Judge Blocks Rule Permitting Concealed Guns In U.S. Parks


By Juliet Eilperin and Del Quentin Wilber
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, March 20, 2009; A09
 


A federal judge yesterday blocked a last-minute rule enacted by President George W. Bush allowing visitors to national parks to carry concealed weapons.


U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit brought by gun-control advocates and environmental groups. The Justice Department had sought to block the injunction against the controversial rule.


The three groups that brought the suit -- the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees -- argued that the Bush action violated several laws.


In her ruling, Kollar-Kotelly agreed that the government's process had been "astoundingly flawed."


She noted that the government justified its decision to forgo an environmental analysis on the grounds that the rule does not "authorize" environmental impacts. Calling this a "tautology," she wrote that officials "abdicated their Congressionally-mandated obligation" to evaluate environmental impacts and "ignored (without sufficient explanation) substantial information in the administrative record concerning environmental impacts" of the rule.


Interior Department spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff said the department could not comment because of "ongoing litigation."


The regulation, which took effect Jan. 9, allowed visitors to carry loaded, concealed guns into national parks and wildlife refuges if state laws there allowed it in public places. In most cases, a state permit would be required to carry a concealed weapon into a national park.


In the past, guns had been allowed in such areas only if they were unloaded, stored or dismantled; gun rights advocates said they saw no reason to be denied the right to carry concealed weapons in parks when they could in other public places.


Bryan Faehner, associate director for park uses at the National Parks Conservation Association, said his group is "extremely pleased" with both the court decision and the fact that Interior is now conducting an internal review of the rule's environmental impact. "This decision by the courts reaffirms our concerns, and the concerns of park rangers across the country, that this new regulation . . . has serious impacts on the parks and increases the risk of opportunistic poaching of wildlife in the parks, and increases the risk to park visitors," Faehner said.


 

"Domari nolo."

Thug: What you lookin' at old man?
Walt Kowalski: Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you shouldn't have messed with? That's me.

Molon Labe.

Standing Wolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,978
Re: firearms in national parks - nyet
« Reply #22 on: March 21, 2009, 04:31:12 PM »
Quote
I think a lot of us already suspect that environmentalism has become the calling card for socialism.  Or let's just call it Communism Nice and leave it at that.

So-called "environmentalism" is one of many masks leftist extremist statism hides behind. The fake class hatred being stirred up over the AIG bonuses is another, and so is most of what passes for so-called "civil rights" agitation these days, and so is so-called "anti-war" activity, and so is the so-called "stimulus" enlargement of the federal government.

I've been referring to all that as "socialism" quite some while. I'm not sure it's really the right term. "Leftist extremist statism" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, and in any event, I doubt "statism" is readily intelligible to very many people.

Ideas, anyone?
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.

PTK

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,318
Re: firearms in national parks - nyet
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2009, 05:15:25 PM »
Quote
Ideas, anyone?

New Democracy?  =D
"Only lucky people grow old." - Frederick L.
September 1915 - August 2008

"If you really do have cancer "this time", then this is your own fault. Like the little boy who cried wolf."

gunsmith

  • I forgot to get vaccinated!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8,179
  • I'm sorry, Dave. I'm afraid I can't do that.
Re: firearms in national parks - nyet
« Reply #24 on: March 21, 2009, 05:37:53 PM »
New Democracy?  =D
environanarchy?
Politicians and bureaucrats are considered productive if they swarm the populace like a plague of locust, devouring all substance in their path and leaving a swath of destruction like a firestorm. The technical term is "bipartisanship".
Rocket Man: "The need for booster shots for the immunized has always been based on the science.  Political science, not medical science."