« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: NFA lawsuits re post '86 machineguns: Hollis v Holder and Watson v Holder  (Read 9670 times)

freakazoid

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,243
Re: NFA lawsuits re post '86 machineguns: Hollis v Holder and Watson v Holder
« Reply #25 on: November 19, 2014, 05:01:37 PM »
I wonder what post 86 machine gun these trusts got the tax stamp for. Hopefully something new.  =)
Report to moderator   Logged
"so I ended up getting the above because I didn't want to make a whole production of sticking something between my knees and cranking. To me, the cranking on mine is pretty effortless, at least on the coarse setting. Maybe if someone has arthritis or something, it would be more difficult for them." - Ben

"I see a rager at least once a week." - brimic

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Re: NFA lawsuits re post '86 machineguns: Hollis v Holder and Watson v Holder
« Reply #26 on: November 19, 2014, 05:14:08 PM »
Quote from: freakazoid on November 19, 2014, 05:01:37 PM
I wonder what post 86 machine gun these trusts got the tax stamp for. Hopefully something new.  =)

Given how fast they were manufactured I'm guessing just third hole in an AR lower or new DIAS.
Report to moderator   Logged
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »