I'm already reading that laws concerning contraception, gay marriage, sodomy, and interracial marriage are all endangered by this ruling.
Gonna be interesting
In his concurring opinion Thomas said that “substantive due process” is an erroneous standard and all decisions based on should be reviewed. Which includes Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. The other 4 in the majority of Dobbs may or may not agree with that, but it’s not just leftists hyperventilating.
That said, it’s not legality of contraception, sodomy between consenting adults, or SSM that is, per se, at risk. Just the SCOTUS rulings that have forced states to allow it. Just like with overturning RvW and Casey doesn’t outlaw abortion, overturning those other cases will merely return those questions to the states. Which, really, is where they belong.