Sigh.
What makes you think I'm not relaxed? :)
Nah, I'm not upset, but I am making, if you will, an extension of the argument. Ok, and laying a little bait so's to get in the following.
The trouble I see here is a false dichotomy. Not flying is not the same thing ignoring the whole of the problem.
I hear the comparison to concealed carry laws. Actually, I'm intimately familiar with the problem, having written a law school paper on how MI's CPL law unconstitutionally violates the due process rights of people with mental illness. Posted about it too, a couple years back.
But saying that not flying is to negligently ignore the problem is to suggest that no one should carry concealed anywhere until everyone can, everywhere. No, not flying is not the solution. But it's not the anti-solution or undermining of a potential solution either.
The point of my post wasn't "we should solve the problem by not flying. I don't and you shouldn't either." It was: th
The enormity of the problem is such that I don't fly, and fully support anyone who is a position to undermine the TSA, however incrementally.