So the question remains, what do you think we should do with guys like this?
Well, I will answer your question Gunner. You are asking a valid question as a stand up guy. Thank you for that.
I am not sure we have any options on this one Gunner. If we do anyting other than return him to his country, we will surely cause a rift that will have implications that we can't even measure. As daddy pointed out when he was still acting civil, he did go to battle and that comes with risk.
If he is innocent, it is just sucks for Parhat. While it will be his intended enemies that will kill him if we return him home, our potentially false accusation, capture and imprisonment probably revealed him to China.
Now the operative word here is potentially. He may have actually had some anti US terrorist agenda or plans. All the article says is that the Bush administration has no or has provided no proof. Either way, I think it is right that we let him go if we have no proof. What happens after that definately won't be good for him. And, rather you agree with him fighting China for independence is just or not. We still wronged him.