Ahhh Optics. Might as well be cornbread.
Every optic is a compromise. Only you can decide which features are most important to you.
I have an EOtech. It sits unmounted on my workbench. I really want to like it. I love the reticle design, and the idea behind a HWS, but it does kinda eat batteries, and in practice it's slower for me than a normal red dot. Perhaps if I trained more.
I also have one of the Primary Arms Advanced Red Dot's. (I have a couple PA red dots actually, but only one of the "advanced". Battery life is what they say. I bought it when it first came out, and haven't turned it off yet. At last check it was still on and bright. They are undeniably not as durable as an Aimpoint. PA says this themselves. But it is afforadble and decent quality for a sight when lives aren't on the line.
I have, have had, or have had issued, several Aimpoints. (sadly none of the small ones) They are the standard for a reason. Always on, nigh on indestructible, precise dot. Good stuff. Expensive. The M68 I had (CompM4, i think?) does give you a little tunnel vision. You are after all looking through a tube.
Had an issue ACOG on my SAW for my second deployment. Also a great optic. Indestructible. light for 10(ish) years, good glass. Mine was the 4X. They are a little unforgiving on the eyebox though.
For my "General Use" rifles. (Defined by me as 0-500 yd use against threats less than 300lbs) I have been slowly transitioning to low powered variable optics with etched reticles and BDC's. My PTR-91, 16" 5.56 AR and 300 BLK AR all wear some version of that. 1-4x or 1-6x (I like 6 better). Zero the optic for my load, then I can ID, range, hold over and shoot all in the scope. I lose a little speed to red dots inside of 75M or so, but pick up a lot of precision past 150-200 or so. If the electronics die, the reticle is still there. Durability and glass quality is as good as your wallet can handle.
Pays your money, Takes your choice.