Post by: GigaBuist on June 09, 2008, 05:21:52 PM
I've been listening for about a half an hour. Nothing really new coming up.
Personally I don't think it's going anywhere.
Post by: MicroBalrog on June 09, 2008, 05:27:53 PM
Post by: Manedwolf on June 09, 2008, 05:29:10 PM
Someone ought to tell him his UFO has arrived.
Post by: MicroBalrog on June 09, 2008, 05:43:20 PM
Post by: Gewehr98 on June 09, 2008, 06:05:28 PM
Post by: MicroBalrog on June 09, 2008, 06:07:24 PM
Post by: Standing Wolf on June 09, 2008, 06:07:36 PM
Post by: Nitrogen on June 09, 2008, 06:24:58 PM
He didnt say he saw aliens.
Btw, this totally wont go anywhere, and thats too bad.
I'm miffed at the Democrats too, this should have happened years ago. This is just further proof that the system is disgustingly broken on both sides.
Post by: GigaBuist on June 09, 2008, 06:42:27 PM
Post by: Matthew Carberry on June 09, 2008, 06:51:39 PM
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on June 09, 2008, 07:00:41 PM
Post by: Matthew Carberry on June 09, 2008, 07:18:19 PM
He just wants to continue his "0-innumerable" streak of resolutions being ignored.
Post by: RaspberrySurprise on June 09, 2008, 07:19:29 PM
Post by: Manedwolf on June 09, 2008, 07:20:48 PM
Post by: Matthew Carberry on June 09, 2008, 07:30:04 PM
It was on CSpan.
Post by: MicroBalrog on June 09, 2008, 10:15:05 PM
Kucinich says he saw something that he didn't know what it was, hence it was an unidentified flying object.
He didnt say he saw aliens.
He didnt say he saw aliens.
It doesn't matter either way.
Quote
Btw, this totally wont go anywhere, and thats too bad.
I'm miffed at the Democrats too, this should have happened years ago. This is just further proof that the system is disgustingly broken on both sides.
I'm miffed at the Democrats too, this should have happened years ago. This is just further proof that the system is disgustingly broken on both sides.
What Nitrogen said.
Post by: The Annoyed Man on June 10, 2008, 01:29:53 AM
Post by: MicroBalrog on June 10, 2008, 01:34:53 AM
Impeach Bush? Hah. I wish the link was still there, but I saw him on Memri TV awhile back, in Syria, talking to the honcho thare. It was digusting. It sounded like "Beat me, give me a wedgie, take my lunch, and then you will like us? Please?" Impeach Kucinich. And Pelosi. and Reid. For starters. Have they never heard of the Logan Act, giveing aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war?
America is not at war with Syria.
Post by: Nitrogen on June 10, 2008, 03:44:17 AM
Impeach Bush? Hah. I wish the link was still there, but I saw him on Memri TV awhile back, in Syria, talking to the honcho thare. It was digusting. It sounded like "Beat me, give me a wedgie, take my lunch, and then you will like us? Please?" Impeach Kucinich. And Pelosi. and Reid. For starters. Have they never heard of the Logan Act, giveing aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war?
The logan act is an unconstitutional joke, beaten only by the Alien and Sedition acts.
Now I agree with you that Kucinich and Pelosi and espically Reid should be impeached, but probably not for the same reasons you do. Mine have more to do with abandonment of duties and oversight.
Post by: Hugh Damright on June 10, 2008, 03:54:31 AM
Post by: HankB on June 10, 2008, 04:48:43 AM
... I think Clinton is the only President in our entire history to be impeached ...
Andrew Johnson.As for Kucinich, the first time I saw him was a couple of election cycles ago when I came upon a debate as I was flipping channels. He was making some point, and, as the Almighty is my witness, I though he was the Socialist Worker's Party candidate from what he was saying.
Imagine my bemusement when I found out he'd already been elected to Congress in Ohio.
Post by: Manedwolf on June 10, 2008, 04:56:00 AM
Impeach Bush? Hah. I wish the link was still there, but I saw him on Memri TV awhile back, in Syria, talking to the honcho thare. It was digusting. It sounded like "Beat me, give me a wedgie, take my lunch, and then you will like us? Please?" Impeach Kucinich. And Pelosi. and Reid. For starters. Have they never heard of the Logan Act, giveing aid and comfort to the enemy in a time of war?
The logan act is an unconstitutional joke, beaten only by the Alien and Sedition acts.
Now I agree with you that Kucinich and Pelosi and espically Reid should be impeached, but probably not for the same reasons you do. Mine have more to do with abandonment of duties and oversight.
What about how the Logan Act should apply to Carter?
Post by: MicroBalrog on June 10, 2008, 05:43:59 AM
What about how the Logan Act should apply to Carter?
What aid and comfort has he given and to whom?
Besides, the Logan Act, as Nitrogen existed, shouldn't exist.
Post by: Manedwolf on June 10, 2008, 05:48:24 AM
What about how the Logan Act should apply to Carter?
What aid and comfort has he given and to whom?
Besides, the Logan Act, as Nitrogen existed, shouldn't exist.
Post by: longeyes on June 10, 2008, 05:49:36 AM
Bush won't be impeached, but a President Obama might well be. There's impeachment in the air, the result of too many betrayals by too many people over the years.
Post by: Tallpine on June 10, 2008, 05:54:36 AM
Post by: HankB on June 10, 2008, 06:06:13 AM
The Democrats aren't going to impeach Bush, though they could and should.
Thing is, any Articles of Impeachment the Dems would draw up wouldn't be for the things that Bush ought to be impeached for - like failing to deal with the influx of millions upon millions of foreign criminals invading our country.
Post by: Tallpine on June 10, 2008, 06:15:42 AM
Quote
millions upon millions of foreign criminals invading our country
Oh, you mean "guest voters" ?
Post by: alan2 on June 10, 2008, 07:32:44 AM
At this point in time, how much longer is Bush going to be in office, I submit that impeachment is something that isn't going to happen.
Post by: The Annoyed Man on June 10, 2008, 08:31:49 AM
Post by: xavier fremboe on June 10, 2008, 09:39:50 AM
Mmm. I sort of like Dennis. I disagree with him on almost every point, but there's a noble quality to him.
It's from his time carrying the One Ring.
Post by: Marnoot on June 10, 2008, 09:43:43 AM
Mmm. I sort of like Dennis. I disagree with him on almost every point, but there's a noble quality to him.
It's from his time carrying the One Ring.
Post by: The Annoyed Man on June 10, 2008, 10:59:37 AM
Quote
Bush won't be impeached, but a President Obama might well be. There's impeachment in the air, the result of too many betrayals by too many people over the years.
Or, a 'President Obama' may well investigate and prosecute the crimes of the Bush Administration. That's almost as good as impeachment. I wonder if Cheney can squeal like a pig.
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 10, 2008, 01:51:25 PM
Understand, I am no fan of Bill Clinton. But 'party payback'? If impeachment charges can be brought up against Clinton for getting a B.J., we'd be foolish to think the Democrats won't bring forth impeachment [of Bush] for deceiving the country into what many consider an unjust war.
They've had almost eight years to do so. They have had over a year with a majority in both houses, but have yet to make a serious attempt. So it ain't so foolish, I guess.
Post by: longeyes on June 10, 2008, 04:11:01 PM
Quote
Or, a 'President Obama' may well investigate and prosecute the crimes of the Bush Administration. That's almost as good as impeachment. I wonder if Cheney can squeal like a pig.
So we've been hearing. But that would be very ill-advised. Political trials of former heads of state is something most Americans associate with violent, benighted nations.
Post by: Hugh Damright on June 10, 2008, 07:05:31 PM
Quote
'party payback'? If impeachment charges can be brought up against Clinton for getting a B.J.
People still repeating this propaganda? The way I remember it, Clinton was impeached for perjuring himself, it came about because of allegations from Paula Jones, and since it was his word against hers there was a question about whether Clinton had a pattern of behavior such as Paula Jones described, and women came forward, I can't remember all their names now .. but Clinton denied and denied but when it came to Monica she had evidence and Clinton was busted and IIRC he had to pay off Paula. So let's be clear on this now, Clinton was not impeached for getting a B.J., he was impeached for perjuring himself over sexual allegations.Quote
we'd be foolish to think the Democrats won't bring forth impeachment [of Bush] for deceiving the country into what many consider an unjust war.
And there's the propaganda again - Bush deceived the country i.e. he lied just like Clinton i.e. republicans do it too. I don't think so.
Post by: Matthew Carberry on June 10, 2008, 09:18:47 PM
Quote
Or, a 'President Obama' may well investigate and prosecute the crimes of the Bush Administration. That's almost as good as impeachment. I wonder if Cheney can squeal like a pig.
So we've been hearing. But that would be very ill-advised. Political trials of former heads of state is something most Americans associate with violent, benighted nations.
And a certain way to ensure that politicians begin to do whatever it takes for them or their party to remain in power.
We're talking corruption and killing on a scale this country has never seen.
The criminal justice system cannot be allowed to be used for mere political retribution.
Post by: PTK on June 11, 2008, 01:24:07 AM
Post by: LAK on June 11, 2008, 02:31:42 AM
No, it is not going to happen. In World Wrestling the "combatants" never really deliver those forearm smashes, headbutts, etc. The idea is to convince enough gullible people to buy the tickets, merchandise and keep them occupied.
--------------------------------
http://searchronpaul.com
http://ussliberty.org/oldindex.html
http://www.gtr5.com
http://ssunitedstates.org
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on June 11, 2008, 02:48:33 AM
i think you need to look at our history more
Post by: HankB on June 11, 2008, 03:18:09 AM
We're talking corruption and killing on a scale this country has never seen.
I'll start you with three words: Lyndon Baines Johnson. . . . Clinton was not impeached for getting a B.J., he was impeached for perjuring himself over sexual allegations.
As was pointed out at the time, hundreds of "lesser" people have gone to prison for perjuring themselves about sexual allegations.
Post by: Matthew Carberry on June 11, 2008, 05:54:44 PM
Man up nancies, quit running your yaps if you aren't willing to back it up. You're embarrassing yourselves.