-
Obama a few months ago (DC gun ban is constitutional):
http://www.vutorch.com/blog/2008/06/video-obama-att.html
Obama Yesterday (DC Gun Ban was unconstitutional):
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/06/26/flip-flop-confirmed-obama-says-dc-gun-ban-went-beyond-constitutional-limits/#comment-1207762
Huh -- that's odd. It looks like he flip-flopped.
-
Not the first thing he has flipped flopped on and won't be the last.
-
Waffles anyone?
-
Made me laugh but for other reasons that cannot be said on a "family" friendly board.
-
Waffles anyone?
That isn't a waffle house. There's no fight going on outside.
-
They are too busy throwing up what they just ate from what they had seen inside.
-
Anyone who thinks Obama has changed his position on guns is naive. You can't have a leftist revolution with an armed opposition.
And Obama has another problem. He can't get clear on the Second Amendment because the real issue with RKBA takes us to uncomfortable cultural issues that no one wants to touch.
-
Waffles anyone?
Obama is at the grille making the waffles and Mc Cain is in the restroom kissing the behind of the lobbyist and religious right.
-
Waffles anyone?
Obama is at the grille making the waffles and Mc Cain is in the restroom kissing the behind of the lobbyist and religious right.
So, I guess you don't consider unions to be special interest groups either.
-
You can't have a leftist revolution with an armed opposition.
Just about all "leftists", as in communists, socialists, anarchists, believe in the RKBA. We can't have our revolution without arms,
Does anyone actually believe that Obama would ever be for that right?
-
You can't have a leftist revolution with an armed opposition.
Just about all "leftists", as in communists, socialists, anarchists, believe in the RKBA. We can't have our revolution without arms,
Does anyone actually believe that Obama would ever be for that right?
He's for the elite having weapons, of course. He wants to ban concealed carry for all but police and military.
The masses would just shoot themselves or each other, they can't be trusted with guns. Or worse, they might shoot at the elites, not realizing that the elites have all their best interests in mind.
-
You can't have a leftist revolution with an armed opposition.
Precisely!
He's for the elite having weapons, of course. He wants to ban concealed carry for all but police and military.
The police, military, and his personal bodyguards, of course.
-
Because Barry is a liar.
Look, guys, he is a committed Socialist. Socialists repeatedly state that lying to further the cause of socialism is morality in practice. Government is their God, and anything done in its service is allowed.
-
Anyone who thinks Obama has changed his position on guns is naive. You can't have a leftist revolution with an armed opposition.
And Obama has another problem. He can't get clear on the Second Amendment because the real issue with RKBA takes us to uncomfortable cultural issues that no one wants to touch.
s/Obama/McCain
I love how Obama changes his mind, and nobody believes him, yet mccain changes his mind and people have no problem believing that.
-
Proof that communists/anarchists, want people to be able to have firearms, http://www.revleft.com/vb/gun-regulation-t82656/index.html?t=82656
The current poll results
Buying a gun should have no restrictions. Pay and leave. 20 33.90%
Guns should have light restrictions (Waiting periods and tests). All weapons should be availible. 27 45.76%
Guns should have light restrictions (Waiting periods and tests). Assault weapons are prohibited. 4 6.78%
Guns should be heavily monitored. Arms should be directly regulated by the government. 4 6.78%
Only the military and police should be armed. 4 6.78%
Whoever voted for the last three have me worried.
-
Waiting periods are not a "light" restriction! They're stupid and a hassle!
Thankfully, we don't have them here. Low crime, too, funny that...
-
It seems all who have voted on the second one didn't do so because of waiting periods, but more on things to make sure insane people or some sort of history of violence don't get there hands on them. I voted for the first one,
-
Well, if a poll on a communist site thinks so!
-
I thought most votes taken by communists ended up with the right answer/person getting 100% or thereabouts.....
-
-
Because Barry is a liar.
Look, guys, he is a committed Socialist. Socialists repeatedly state that lying to further the cause of socialism is morality in practice. Government is their God, and anything done in its service is allowed.
funny how closely related Socialism and Islam work in practice....
Balog, very funny, way to make Dogfish Head IPA go through my nasal passages bro.
-
funny how closely related Socialism and Islam any religion work in practice....
I agree.
Great cat picture.
-
funny how closely related Socialism and Islam any religion work in practice....
I agree.
Great cat picture.
Show me in The Bible where it says lying to people not believers is OK if it furthers Christianity...(hint, don't bother looking, it's not in there)
-
funny how closely related Socialism and Islam any religion work in practice....
I agree.
Great cat picture.
Show me in The Bible where it says lying to people not believers is OK if it furthers Christianity...(hint, don't bother looking, it's not in there)
Matthew 22:21
-
I knew it! The bukkit didn't simply go missing, it was horded by Capitalist Cat, ROFL You wins at teh internetz
funny how closely related Socialism and Islam work in practice....
??
Well, if a poll on a communist site thinks so! rolleyes
What are you implying?
-
funny how closely related Socialism and Islam any religion work in practice....
I agree.
Great cat picture.
Show me in The Bible where it says lying to people not believers is OK if it furthers Christianity...(hint, don't bother looking, it's not in there)
Matthew 22:21
What does that verse have to do with lying to nonbelievers to further Christianity???
-
funny how closely related Socialism and Islam any religion work in practice....
I agree.
Great cat picture.
Show me in The Bible where it says lying to people not believers is OK if it furthers Christianity...(hint, don't bother looking, it's not in there)
Matthew 22:21
What does that verse have to do with lying to nonbelievers to further Christianity???
It was the closest thing I could find to a lying government being ok.
-
Well, if a poll on a communist site thinks so! rolleyes
What are you implying?
That your poll is a bit unscientific, given its extremely small sample size and its limited sample pool. I know a few communists who believe in the RKBA, but I also know a lot more that don't. Granted, my anecdotal evidence isn't scientific either, but to say that communists are blanketly in support of the RKBA is not borne out by any facts that I know of.