Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Waitone on October 12, 2008, 09:12:10 PM

Title: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: Waitone on October 12, 2008, 09:12:10 PM
What are they taking about?

Do I need to call the kids in?

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/orl-shootout1108oct11,0,563660.story
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: Lennyjoe on October 12, 2008, 09:23:14 PM
Dunno, all I see is a link with no story. Sucks trying to read threads on my blackberry.
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on October 12, 2008, 09:30:10 PM
Disposable means if I were a gangbanger and used my $400 AK to off some bi-yatches, I'd take it to the nearest automotive chop shop that I feed with my usual activities and have the barrel and bolt melted to a puddle of liquid hot magma so I couldn't be fingered with the weapon even if I were a suspect, then dump the remaining parts into the nearest ocean water.

Although... if I used an SKS, I could off twice as many bi-yatches and melt down the gun for less cost per bi-yatch that I capped.
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: lee n. field on October 12, 2008, 09:41:15 PM
Mine's not disposable.  Cost me good money, it did.

I suspect this is the next gun control meme.
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: Manedwolf on October 12, 2008, 10:29:12 PM
Quote
Patterson had been arrested at least 13 times in Orange County on charges related to drugs, violence and firearms.


There's the answer. WHY WAS HE OUT?
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: Gewehr98 on October 12, 2008, 10:30:54 PM
Wish somebody would dispose of AK-47s in my direction.  I could always use more. 
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: MicroBalrog on October 12, 2008, 10:38:15 PM


There's the answer. WHY WAS HE OUT?

Ever hear the term 'anarcho-tyranny'?
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: Matthew Carberry on October 12, 2008, 10:47:07 PM
The article is chock full of "we need the AWB back".
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: Thor on October 12, 2008, 11:04:09 PM
The article is chock full of "we need the AWB back".

Yes, it does........(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativecave.com%2FSmileys%2Fdefault%2Fhammer.gif&hash=5447e84c60b87476015ff7ca54da7aa29042f458)
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: Don't care on October 12, 2008, 11:14:24 PM
The Orlando Sentinel has been, and continues to be just another anti-gun rag that poses as a legitimate source for news.

I'm not really shocked that they haven't done a piece on "disposable people", as I could think of a few reporters there that could be replaced with monkeys and parrots.
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: ctdonath on October 13, 2008, 08:53:19 AM
Quote
'anarcho-tyranny'

Great term.
Title: Re: Someone define a "Disposable AK-47"
Post by: MechAg94 on October 13, 2008, 10:10:58 AM
Perhaps they could do an investigative story on how those guys obtained these "disposable" AK's since they obviously weren't able to buy them legally.  I doubt they went to the local gun shop to pick them up.