Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: digitalandanalog on January 09, 2009, 03:39:03 AM

Title: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: digitalandanalog on January 09, 2009, 03:39:03 AM
Let's see... the country is broke. We have to borrow money and if we default our AAA rating is trashed for god knows how long.

Now there is all this talk of borrowing more money and spending money we don't have.

Did Obama take financial advice from my ex wife?

If we can't pay for it, who will?

Is Great Britain the rich uncle we are waiting for to die so that we can pay off our borrowed debts? Or something like that?

Seriously, What what the hell are our Great Leaders thinking?
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 09, 2009, 07:16:05 AM
Ah, but The One has taken an advanced course.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: El Tejon on January 09, 2009, 07:47:03 AM
Damn the Economics, Full Politics Ahead! =D
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Waitone on January 09, 2009, 07:48:10 AM
We have no intentions of repaying debt.  We will inflate.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: charby on January 09, 2009, 07:59:29 AM
We have no intentions of repaying debt.  We will inflate.

<Sarcasm>

Well most of the Latin American countries have been through that in the last 50 years, so I guess it is our turn.

Well the benefit is when its all over with your home loans and student loan payments should be dirt cheap.


</Sarcasm>
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: FTA84 on January 09, 2009, 09:09:06 AM
This is a real problem for our country because I don't see any elected officials being able to 'fix it' until it is 'broken'.  That is, we are now so deep in debt, the only way to get out from under it, is to slash spending like no tomorrow.  Now imagine a politician whose only accomplishment is to kill off tons of programs (including things like social security / medicare, i.e., leaving many old people in the cold).  Even if such a person got elected, they could never stay elected in this country.  More so, we would need say 50% of congress to made of these type of people, so it will never happen.

It will only happen when our social programs get crushed by the debt they created. Then we may have a chance for them to repair the situation
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: HankB on January 09, 2009, 09:14:24 AM
Seriously, What what the hell are our Great Leaders thinking?
"How can I get elected one more time?" (Except for the ones who are thinking "Can I avoid indictment/impeachment and prosecution if I do this?")
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: MicroBalrog on January 09, 2009, 09:19:13 AM
 
Quote
More so, we would need say 50% of congress to made of these type of people, so it will never happen.

Not really. Just big enough to make deals with the others.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: RevDisk on January 09, 2009, 10:41:51 AM
We have no intentions of repaying debt.  We will inflate.

I sincerely do think that is the plan.  It worked in Central America and a few other locations.    Oh, it crushed the economy, decimated domestic production, wiped out life savings, destroyed retirement funds/pensions, etc.  But it got the government out of debt, and that was the important thing!
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: HankB on January 09, 2009, 11:01:26 AM
Quote from: Waitone
on January 08, 2009, 10:48:10 PM
We have no intentions of repaying debt.  We will inflate.
I sincerely do think that is the plan. 
I'm not sure I agree - this assumes politicians are taking the long view.

They're not.

I really believe that politicians as a group are only concerned about the upcoming election cycle.

Period.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on January 09, 2009, 11:13:04 AM
You know, I was driving home last night and thinking about this:

Government is the only entity that can get away with counterfeit and money laundering.

Need more money in the coffers without increasing taxes?  Print some!

Stick it into circulation, tax it, digitize it and get it electronically transferred back to you.  Inflation might decrease its value slightly and hurt your taxpaying population that didn't actually ASK for more money to be introduced into the system (and decrease the value of their money as a result), but heck:  you're Government, and you needed that money.

They skim their vig from every transaction... from introduction by the Fed to the banking system all the way down to you and me.  Even if we pocket it and stick it in the bank, they'll get some money from it via income taxes and the interest generated by it.  And... it'll get spent eventually.  G-men just have to wait to get their bite of it.  Cuz they will.

More money in the system always helps government and always hurts consumers.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Standing Wolf on January 09, 2009, 11:13:32 AM
Quote
Seriously, What what the hell are our Great Leaders thinking?

They're buying votes with public dollars. This isn't a recent development.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Headless Thompson Gunner on January 09, 2009, 11:25:59 AM
Let's see... the country is broke. We have to borrow money and if we default our AAA rating is trashed for god knows how long.

Now there is all this talk of borrowing more money and spending money we don't have.

Did Obama take financial advice from my ex wife?

If we can't pay for it, who will?

Is Great Britain the rich uncle we are waiting for to die so that we can pay off our borrowed debts? Or something like that?

Seriously, What what the hell are our Great Leaders thinking?
Who exactly do you mean by "we" when you say things like  "we're broke" and "we can't pay for it"? 

I ask because most of us are in fact quite solvent.  I have no hard numbers, but I'd say that 90% or 95% of non-impoverished Americans are able tomeet their obligations.   Fedgov is borrowing a lot, but there's virtually no chance of them defaulting or running out of eager creditors any time soon.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Headless Thompson Gunner on January 09, 2009, 11:33:57 AM
We have no intentions of repaying debt.  We will inflate.
We're in the midst of the biggest deflationary crash in nearly a century.  They've done everything they can to fight or reverse the deflation, but they've been remarkably ineffective. 

So even if they wanted to inflate, I'm not sure they could. Not right now anyway.  The government is just too small to control the monster that is our economy.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: longeyes on January 09, 2009, 12:23:01 PM
You have to think of America as a narco-state.  Your "leaders" are dealers and pushers and your fellow citizens, all too many, are junkies.  Then it will become clear that the whole thing is a toxic process that can only end macrocosmically the way these things end microcosmically.

As for inflating away our debts, well, inflating away trillions will be quite a show, and will utterly destroy everything we know about "America."  This country will devolve into the Thunderdome.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Werewolf on January 09, 2009, 04:42:26 PM
<Sarcasm>

Well most of the Latin American countries have been through that in the last 50 years, so I guess it is our turn.

Well the benefit is when its all over with your home loans and student loan payments should be dirt cheap.


</Sarcasm>


Yeah - and all your savings will be worthless.

Hyperinflation is a really bad thing. Sure your relative debt goes down but those who own the debt or savers really get screwed.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Scout26 on January 09, 2009, 04:57:00 PM
We're following the Japanese model.   

Recession
Massive Public works spending
Continued, long drawn out recession

The Japanese copied the FDR model......
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: longeyes on January 09, 2009, 11:24:25 PM
Yes, but the Japanese are used to and willing to "do without," and they are savers, and they embrace a more collective view of society, and they have a well-developed sense of shame.

All that makes "stagnation" a lot more bearable than it will be for a nation like ours, that is built on an ever-escalating future.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Azrael256 on January 10, 2009, 01:05:47 AM
Quote
I took basic economics

Did you pay attention?  This is Keynes 101.  Well, they think it is, anyway.

Quote
More money in the system always helps government and always hurts consumers.

Um... no.  Inflation helps debtors, and hurts people on a fixed income with no COLA-like adjustment.  It hurts debtholders when it exceeds the interest they charge.  Most consumers are wage earners who carry debt.  Savers who hold large liquid assets entirely in cash under the mattress with no inflation protection are just idiots, and are probably not consuming debtors anyway.

Quote
Hyperinflation is a really bad thing.

True, but we're not zimbabwe.  Third world crapholes hyperinflate because they have zero chance of backing the currency with *any* production.  Remember, zimbabwe didn't hyperinflate until after the means of production was literally run out of the country.  If production completely freezes here, then I'll worry.

Quote
The Japanese copied the FDR model..


Eh, kinda.  From Keynes to FDR to Japan to today is three big leaps.  Play telephone with kindergartners and you'll see why historians never say "this is exactly like when..."

Keynesian economics will get you out of a slump.  The problem, as we discovered post-depression, is that getting government to throttle back is impossible.  Once people latch onto the teat, they don't want to turn loose.  So, Keynesian economics turns into a giant ponzi scheme at some point.  If everything keeps growing steadily, outpacing obligations by inflating through increased production, we're cool.  Pushing entitlements and the like indefinitely into the future creates a drag that prevents growth from outrunning obligations, and at some point (probably not right now.  Sorry teotwawki folks) it can't keep up.

Anyway, the point is that anyone who tells you that he has a macro solution to something is probably a liar who's selling something.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: digitalandanalog on January 10, 2009, 02:06:31 AM
Quote
Quote
I took basic economics

Did you pay attention?  This is Keynes 101.  Well, they think it is, anyway

And I can get more basic than that...

Grandma said don't spend it if you ain't got it.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Azrael256 on January 10, 2009, 04:35:25 AM
Quote
And I can get more basic than that...

Grandma said don't spend it if you ain't got it.

Something tells me that "grandma" is perhaps less frequently cited, and probably doesn't actually practice that.

But, hey, the macro guys get spanked every time we have an economic shock like this.  It seems their "theory of everything" forgot to include everything again.  Maybe "grandma" and her folksy fiscal policy will become all the rage in the next bubble.  It ain't likely, but it's nice to think about.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: zahc on January 10, 2009, 11:22:26 AM
speaking of japan, it seems rising crime is being caused by economic hard times, in the form of old people stealing.
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/12/24/elderly.shoplifters/index.html?eref=rss_topstories
Also, the dollar is at a 13 year low against the yen, and there was/is a big run on USD. People are taking out loans to buy USD in hopes that it goes back up.

In the last 7 days Origami Bank has folded, Sumo Bank has gone belly up and Bonsai Bank announced plans to cut some of its branches. Yesterday, it was announced that Karaoke Bank is up for sale and will likely go for a song while today shares in Kamikaze Bank were suspended after they nose-dived. While Samurai Bank is soldiering on following sharp cutbacks, Ninja Bank is reported to have taken a hit, but they remain in the black. Furthermore, 500 staff at Karate Bank got the chop and analysts report that there is something fishy going on at Sushi Bank where it is feared that staff may get a raw deal.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: crawdaddyjim on January 10, 2009, 05:14:41 PM
It is economic judo being worked on China, India, Russia, the ME and all of those other suckers who bought our debt (lent us money). They thought they were gonna get a nice return on their investments. Nope. We will just inflate away that possibility. And as we are one of the lowest or lowest saving nations on the planet with the largest economy. It will work until we have to fight the repo man. Then it could go all wobbly. But who cares about that. That is for the next administration to worry about....


Jim
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Monkeyleg on January 10, 2009, 05:50:33 PM
Quote
...Origami Bank has folded...

Sorry, couldn't let a good pun get lost in the middle of a serious discussion. ;)
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: myrockfight on January 11, 2009, 03:14:48 AM
In the last 7 days Origami Bank has folded, Sumo Bank has gone belly up and Bonsai Bank announced plans to cut some of its branches. Yesterday, it was announced that Karaoke Bank is up for sale and will likely go for a song while today shares in Kamikaze Bank were suspended after they nose-dived. While Samurai Bank is soldiering on following sharp cutbacks, Ninja Bank is reported to have taken a hit, but they remain in the black. Furthermore, 500 staff at Karate Bank got the chop and analysts report that there is something fishy going on at Sushi Bank where it is feared that staff may get a raw deal.

...The only thing worse than the state of the economy.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: RevDisk on January 11, 2009, 10:48:58 PM
It is economic judo being worked on China, India, Russia, the ME and all of those other suckers who bought our debt (lent us money). They thought they were gonna get a nice return on their investments. Nope. We will just inflate away that possibility. And as we are one of the lowest or lowest saving nations on the planet with the largest economy. It will work until we have to fight the repo man. Then it could go all wobbly. But who cares about that. That is for the next administration to worry about....

Umm....  Perhaps you are unaware of the fact that only 25.52% of the national debt is held by foreign entities.  "All those suckers" happens to be the US citizens.  Think bank reserves, investment trusts, credit unions, etc etc.   It would be unwise to default on the major holdings of every bank and credit union in the US.

Actually, ah, the US government has never once defaulted on a single payment on t-bills.  Fiscal 2008 is projected at $412 Billion in interest payments on t-bills.  Believe it or not, t-bills historically never paid great interest.  No one invests in t-bills to make a great return on their investment.  The primary reason why they are so popular (excluding legally mandatory purchases) is their historical reliability.  Miss a payment, no one is buying them.  And expect lawsuits out the ying yang, that likely would succeed.  Trust me, they'd loot your savings account directly before they miss payments on t-bills.
 
But let's say "soak 'em foreigners".  The top foreign holders of US t-bills are China (652.9b), Japan (585.5b), and UK (360.2b).  Next closest country is Brazil, quite down the list investment wise (134.5b).  Japan and UK are among our closest allies.  Cutting them off would be a bad idea.   China, well...   Cutting off trade with China would be mighty interesting.  Considering how much money they're kicking back to the politicians.

Not sure why you think India (12.2b), Russia (80.9b) are major holders.  They're not even close.  Heck, Luxembourg has almost more in holdings than India and Russia put together.  OPEC holds 187.7b, but that includes 6 non-ME countries. 
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Balog on January 12, 2009, 02:10:20 PM
I still don't understand how the fed.gov can expect to spends billions more than it takes in every year, and think that will never catch up to them.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Headless Thompson Gunner on January 12, 2009, 02:26:00 PM
I still don't understand how the fed.gov can expect to spends billions more than it takes in every year, and think that will never catch up to them.
People keep buying their debt. Heck, right now the buying public can't get enough.  US FedGov debt is the safest investment in the world. 
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Werewolf on January 12, 2009, 02:49:24 PM
People keep buying their debt. Heck, right now the buying public can't get enough.  US FedGov debt is the safest investment in the world. 
In both economics and finance whatever the going interest rate on Gov Debt is is considered the RISK FREE rate.

I imagine that that is going to change in the next 20 years or so and is really going to screw up a whole lot of economic and financial models.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: ELSORDO on January 12, 2009, 03:49:01 PM
Newbie here....I probably shouldn't attempt to quote this as I can't recall the source, but it was so sobering as to bring me up short when I heard it.  Paraphrasiing it went like....."If all the US Government debt came due tomorrow, there would literally not be enough money collectively between all the US citizens and US businesses to make the payment."   Sorry I can't quote the source but maybe someone else heard it as well.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Balog on January 12, 2009, 04:20:21 PM
People keep buying their debt. Heck, right now the buying public can't get enough.  US FedGov debt is the safest investment in the world. 

Well, yeah, but they have to repay the debt right? And to finance the ever increasing debt obligations they.... sell more debt? Do you honestly think this can be continued forever?
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Headless Thompson Gunner on January 12, 2009, 11:13:46 PM
Well, yeah, but they have to repay the debt right? And to finance the ever increasing debt obligations they.... sell more debt? Do you honestly think this can be continued forever?
Continued forever?  Maybe, maybe not. 

Continued for the foreseeable future?  Abso-fricken-lutely.

FedGov is the primo financial powerhouse in the world.  They have the single most valuable asset ever known to man: the power to tax the American economy.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Balog on January 13, 2009, 12:25:15 PM
But the more they tax, the worse the economy. It's like cannabalizing yourself. Sure, you can cut your leg off and eat it, but that's hardly a good strategy. And just saying "Well we're tough, we can take it!" Isn't much of an answer either. America is not invincible. The more the things that make us different and special are taken away the closer we come to ruin. I'm not suggesting TEOTWAWKI per se, but there is only so much damage even the American economy can take before it implodes and we become another 2nd or 3rd world country.

Our avowed socialist climate czar (Kyoto anyone?), plus bailouts, plus New New Deal social programs, plus socialized medicine, plus baby boomers starting to call in their Social Security........ I think just saying "We're America, we can never run out of money!" is a naïve and foolhardy thought process.
Title: Re: Maybe I am confused...I took basic economics
Post by: Tallpine on January 15, 2009, 04:30:29 PM
Quote
Well the benefit is when its all over with your home loans and student loan payments should be dirt cheap.

Yep, you can make the choice between buying lunch and paying your monthly mortgage payment  =|