Post by: RaggedClaws on November 11, 2005, 04:53:25 AM
My wife and I currently share a car (FWD VW Passat Wagon), and every day she drops me off and picks me up from the train (with our new baby in tow). I'd prefer to be able to drive myself to the train, through any kind of weather (in the near future, I will always live within 5 miles of a train station, currently closer than that). Other than that, I would use the Jeep very occasionally.
So... For those Jeep folks out there, what is your opinion about the 2.5L 4cyl versus the 4.0L 6cyl engines? Is the gas mileage/horsepower trade-off worth it? Would I be able to tow a small fishing boat with the smaller engine? A small camper? I would like to get into off-roading at some point, is either engine more suited for that? Hard top versus soft top?
Any and all advice concerning Jeep Wranglers would be greatly appreciated!
(By the way, yes, I've ridden in Jeeps many times in the past, and I love them and their utilitarian nature)
Post by: charby on November 11, 2005, 05:02:33 AM
The 2.5L should be able to pull a small fishing boat no problem, not sure about the camper, depends upon weight.
I personally would use the 4.0 if I was pulling anything, just nice to have the extra hp when pulling a load. With that being said a Jeep makes a crappy tow vehicle in my opinion, I used to pull my 14' boat back and forth to the lake with Jeep a few years ago. Rather have something with a longer wheel base for towing.
Jeep is a great off road vehicle, but you don't have a lot of cargo space. Sounds more like a small 4x4 pickup truck would work better for you. Like a S-10 or a Ford Ranger.
oh yeah.. hard top, soft tops are cold in the winter time and are not truely weather proof. I used to get dripped on driving at interstate speeds during a thunderstorm.
Charby
Post by: Jamisjockey on November 11, 2005, 05:09:10 AM
Post by: RaggedClaws on November 11, 2005, 05:19:29 AM
I don't have a present need to tow anything, I was just looking towards the future. I could always tow with my Passat, or whatever I replace that with in the future. In the next couple years, the only thing I would realistically consider getting would be a canoe, and the Passat can handle that no problem.
This is really just a beater commuter car for a very small commute to the train station over hilly, windy roads with the possibility of snow and ice.
The only problem with a Cherokee is that it doesn't have the Wrangler's good looks (as you noted)!
I've always wanted a Jeep CJ/Wrangler, I don't know why, I just love them.
Post by: Jamisjockey on November 11, 2005, 05:22:20 AM
Post by: SpookyPistolero on November 11, 2005, 10:27:15 AM
I grew up with Jeeps and my dad still has a lot. I learned to drive on a Willy jeep, the CJ2. Dad always drove a CJ7 that has been amazing. It would go almost as many places as the Willys would. Neither has ever failed to carry it's passengers home. Once, the shifter came loose on my dad's CJ7 and got him home in 3rd. Pretty funny, actually.
Anyway, aside from those we had both a Wrangler with the 4 cyl and a Cherokee. The Cherokee is a really wicked vehicle, and if you like that type at all, I'd go for it. I like the standard types like JamisJockey posted. The 4.0 that Jeep uses is a really great design and I never had in problems out of it. However, the 4 cyl wrangler had more than a few engine troubles. The design is just crap, and I'd got straight to the 4.0 or nothing at all.
I'm a huge believer in Jeeps, they're good stuff. They give me that feeling I get when I think of being along side Lewis and Clark or when I'm shooting a scout rifle.
On a more practical note, I've pulled lots of well-loaded trailers across rough trails and roads without any problem.
Post by: RaggedClaws on November 11, 2005, 11:11:41 AM
I always think of those old WWII movies, or those M.A.S.H. episodes where they're swerving around mortar explosions. Jeeps are totally unique too. They aren't trucks (though some call them trucks), they aren't cars, they're just jeeps.OK, JamisJockey got me thinking about the old Cherokees now. Any specific year models I should be concerned about, anything to look out for when browsing the lots? I'm very big on prolonged window shopping and research...
I still love that classic CJ look, maybe one day when I win the lottery, I'll restore an old MB or M38.
Post by: Jamisjockey on November 12, 2005, 11:34:03 AM
To tell if the vehicle has been offroaded hard, look for tire rub marks on on the control arms up front and the insides of the wheelwells.
Of course, the lower the mileage the better.
Post by: jefnvk on November 12, 2005, 11:58:08 AM
Post by: Smoke on November 12, 2005, 02:09:06 PM
My suggestions:
1. Get one.
2. Get the 4.0L (more power, more resale)
3. Don't look into aftermarket parts (it's a vicious never ending spiral that will suck all the $ out of your pockets)
4. Don't attempt to drive it off road, if you do you will invariably resort to #3.
5. If you live where there is cold and snow, hold out for the hardtop.
6. Tread carefully, once you get a Jeep you will be hooked and always have to have one.
7. Enjoy the addiction as much as the rest of us.
Smoke
Post by: Jamisjockey on November 12, 2005, 04:03:30 PM
Quote from: jefnvk
Jamis, what type of gas mileage do you get with that? I just totaled my pretty fuel efficent Cavalier, and am in the market for a smaller SUV/truck. I hate the idea of cutting my mileage in half, though.
It got 18mpg typically even with the big meats (31's). I no longer have it, and have a pretty fuel efficient Hyundai. I'd love to get another thats for sure.
Post by: Jamisjockey on November 12, 2005, 04:05:47 PM
Quote
4. Don't attempt to drive it off road, if you do you will invariably resort to #3.
Then whats the point?Jeeps are meant to be driven off road. Period. There isn't a better hunting/fishing/exploring vehicle made.
Learning to drive off road will also make one a better on road urban driver.
Post by: SpookyPistolero on November 12, 2005, 04:28:08 PM
Post by: Jamisjockey on November 12, 2005, 04:34:48 PM
The Rubicon TJ is a great package. Lockers, D44 axles, and extra skid plating. Not a bad package.
The new Jeeps are junk, though.
Post by: Smoke on November 13, 2005, 02:28:48 AM
Quote
The new Jeeps are junk, though.
Gotta disagree there my friend.
This Jeep was my 5th. Came after a two CJ7s, a CJ8, and a Cherokee. It has 107,000 miles on it with lots of offroad use. Still going strong and little breakage that was not my fault.
New Jeeps are solid machines and good performers.
Smoke
Post by: Jamisjockey on November 13, 2005, 04:43:03 AM
Quote from: Smoke
Quote
The new Jeeps are junk, though.
Gotta disagree there my friend.http://home.earthlink.net/~rogerwparks/97TJ1.jpg
http://home.earthlink.net/~rogerwparks/97TJ.jpg
This Jeep was my 5th. Came after a two CJ7s, a CJ8, and a Cherokee. It has 107,000 miles on it with lots of offroad use. Still going strong and little breakage that was not my fault.
New Jeeps are solid machines and good performers.
Smoke
Post by: Tallpine on November 13, 2005, 06:03:29 AM
Especially in snow or ice, the narrow track and short wheelbase can mess up even a careful driver. The best thing in the snow is something long and heavy (like a loaded school bus
)The old jeeps that I've had experience with were always breaking down - often literally things like broken frames. But those were used really hard so such things could be expected.
If you just want a 4x4 to drive occasionally, I'd suggest a 70's vintage Chevy/GMC pickup. The MT DNRC is buying up those (1973-1987) and restoring them for use as wildland firefighting engines.
But if you just want to look cool, then buy the Jeep by all means.
Post by: SpookyPistolero on November 13, 2005, 07:01:59 AM