Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Jamisjockey on April 14, 2009, 04:52:48 PM

Title: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Jamisjockey on April 14, 2009, 04:52:48 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-04-13-columbine-myths_N.htm?se=yahoorefer

They weren't goths or loners.
The two teenagers who killed 13 people and themselves at suburban Denver's Columbine High School 10 years ago next week weren't in the "Trenchcoat Mafia," disaffected videogamers who wore cowboy dusters. The killings ignited a national debate over bullying, but the record now shows Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold hadn't been bullied — in fact, they had bragged in diaries about picking on freshmen and "fags."




Their rampage put schools on alert for "enemies lists" made by troubled students, but the enemies on their list had graduated from Columbine a year earlier. Contrary to early reports, Harris and Klebold weren't on antidepressant medication and didn't target jocks, blacks or Christians, police now say, citing the killers' journals and witness accounts. That story about a student being shot in the head after she said she believed in God? Never happened, the FBI says now.



So basically, they were just nuts. 
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: lee n. field on April 14, 2009, 05:00:18 PM
Quote
That story about a student being shot in the head after she said she believed in God? Never happened, the FBI says now.

A bit of modern evangelical hagiography bites the dust.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: gunsmith on April 14, 2009, 05:28:09 PM
what they fail to address is that the parents of one of them was extremely anti gun, telling the young killer
"guns are only made for killing people" taught him well I guess.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: MicroBalrog on April 14, 2009, 05:38:43 PM
Does this matter? Really, does it matter?
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Balog on April 14, 2009, 05:48:51 PM
Does this matter? Really, does it matter?

This^^

Also, are we just taking whatever USA Today spews out as gospel now? I get a "You see, even just plain ole folks can go nuts and start a-killing with those eeeevvvvviiiilllllll black rifles! Ban em all now!" kinda vibe from this.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Marnoot on April 14, 2009, 05:51:40 PM
I get a "You see, even just plain ole folks can go nuts and start a-killing with those eeeevvvvviiiilllllll black rifles! Ban em all now!" kinda vibe from this.

Did you read the article? It clearly stated Harris was a predatory psychopath, not "plain ole folk."
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Jamisjockey on April 14, 2009, 05:53:39 PM
What struck me was that the latest indications are that no matter what, they wanted to kill alot of people.  Alot of the no tolerance anti-bullying rhetoric from schools came from this incident.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Reifen on April 14, 2009, 05:58:20 PM
This article just confirms for me what I already know.

I was 15 in High School when this happened.  I wore black clothes, listened to heavy metal, played video games, and thought black trench coats just looked awesome.  I wasn't one of the cool kids and I was fine with that because I had my own group of friends.  Columbine happened and I spent the rest of High School getting funny looks and hearing jokes behind my back that I might shoot up the school.  

So yeah, this article is just a big "No, really?!"

 :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Balog on April 14, 2009, 05:59:09 PM
Did you read the article? It clearly stated Harris was a predatory psychopath, not "plain ole folk."

Just the quoted parts; went back and read it now. It's not bad in the way I thought it'd be, but still slanted anti.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: S. Williamson on April 14, 2009, 06:27:07 PM
This article just confirms for me what I already know.

I was 15 in High School when this happened.  I wore black clothes, listened to heavy metal, played video games, and thought black trench coats just looked awesome.  I wasn't one of the cool kids and I was fine with that because I had my own group of friends.  Columbine happened and I spent the rest of High School getting funny looks and hearing jokes behind my back that I might shoot up the school.  

So yeah, this article is just a big "No, really?!"

 :rolleyes:
Hate to admit it, but same situation here.  Had zero interest in guns at the time, though... thought Bud K knives (ack) were awesome, but never bought any.

Thought it was hilarious when we sat around one day trying to figure out what we'd do if that happened at our school.  The general consensus was (we were nerds, after all) "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few/one" and figured that we'd stop the shooters by any means necessary.  This actually ended up being where I got my first taste in unconventional melee tactics and weapons.  Explaining to my parents exactly how I got hit in the face with a math book, twice, was tricky.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Headless Thompson Gunner on April 14, 2009, 07:09:39 PM
Does this matter? Really, does it matter?
Yes, this matters.  A lot of awful school policies and politics were build up in response to the falsehoods surrounding this story.

Want an example?  Before the shooting we had a pistol marksmanship team at my high school.  After the shooting we didn't.

Want another example?  Three weeks after the shooting I was caught with an allen wrench in my pocket.  I don't remember why I had it, probably needed it for shop class or something.  It turns out that allen wrenches of some particular size can be used to lock the doors that divide the various wings of the school.  The numbnuts teacher who saw that I had the thing thought I was going to use it to lock students inside the building so that they wouldn't be able to escape once I started shooting the place up.  She wanted to have me expelled.  Fortunately sanity prevailed.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Antibubba on April 14, 2009, 08:10:56 PM
Quote
Explaining to my parents exactly how I got hit in the face with a math book, twice, was tricky.

It sounds like you took sum punishment.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Tuco on April 14, 2009, 09:31:25 PM
It sounds like you took sum punishment.

As if it made any difference.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 14, 2009, 09:37:36 PM
As if it made any difference.

Come now, let's not divide over this. 
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: MillCreek on April 14, 2009, 09:44:59 PM
Adding insult to injury only multiplies the quotient of pain.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: roo_ster on April 14, 2009, 10:18:25 PM
He was firmly rooted in the square clique.

Sounds like they thought they were integrating their knowledge of HTH responses, but the approach was actually derivative of a dorm-room bull session.

Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Harold Tuttle on April 14, 2009, 10:55:12 PM
droogs were a factor?
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: gunsmith on April 15, 2009, 03:11:43 AM
It sounds like you took sum punishment.
Something about this doesn't really ad up.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: S. Williamson on April 15, 2009, 04:19:54 AM
L say!  =D

Farce-on-force tactics combined with high-schoolers trying to act "macho" led to some really funny things.  =)

Quote
Yes, this matters.  A lot of awful school policies and politics were build up in response to the falsehoods surrounding this story.
Seconded.  For me, it was my first experience for sensationalism to influence popular opinion, which in turn persuaded parents to demand changes, and eventually put me in a group despised and feared for no reason at all.  My own parents (whom I have always, although on occasion begrudgingly, held in high regard) started treating me like a time bomb without a digital display.  Years later, I still think there's some distrust there.  =(
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: seeker_two on April 15, 2009, 06:25:22 AM
Explaining to my parents exactly how I got hit in the face with a math book, twice, was tricky.

What answer did you formulate?....
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: HankB on April 15, 2009, 08:31:49 AM
droogs were a factor?
It's difficult to find a school shooting where one or more of the perps were not on drugs, almost invariably prescription meds. IIRC, in Columbine, at least one of the shooters was on Luvox.

Side effects?

Quote
Families and caregivers of children and adolescents who are taking Luvox should be especially watchful of the warning signs associated with suicide listed below.
The warning signs include:
* Thoughts or talk of death or suicide
* Thoughts or talk of self-harm or harm to others
* Any recent attempts of self-harm
* Mood changes such as an increase in aggressive or unusual behaviour, irritability, agitation or worsening of depressive symptom.

http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/BHCV2/bhcmed.nsf/pages/smcluvox/$File/smcluvox.pdf

Another triumph for the pill-pushing quacks of modern psychiatry.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: JonnyB on April 15, 2009, 08:59:38 AM
It sounds like you took sum punishment.

He forgot to "divide and conquer".


jb
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Marnoot on April 15, 2009, 11:43:44 AM
Another triumph for the pill-pushing quacks of modern psychiatry.
Scientology much?

I'm on Luvox. I have no thoughts of self-harm, or harming others. Granted, effects are different for different people, but I find it awfully hard to swallow that a drug turned a happy-go-lucky harmless teen into a predatory psychopath. Blaming the meds doesn't make much more sense than blaming the guns. Did the meds somehow make them more confident or some other indirect contributory effect? Possibly. But SSRI medications do not a psychopath make.

The "black box" symptoms you listed are required on *all* anti-depressants as far as I know. That said, I don't think any causation has been even remotely proven, only correlation, which, all things considered is pretty worthless in this case.

I'll agree medications are over-prescribed and pushed a little too eagerly by many doctors. But that doesn't mean they're worthless, inherently harmful, or snake oil. They have their place and their purpose.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Jamisjockey on April 15, 2009, 11:51:52 AM
It's difficult to find a school shooting where one or more of the perps were not on drugs, almost invariably prescription meds. IIRC, in Columbine, at least one of the shooters was on Luvox.

Side effects?
Families and caregivers of children and adolescents who are taking Luvox should be especially watchful of the warning signs associated with suicide listed below.
The warning signs include:
* Thoughts or talk of death or suicide
* Thoughts or talk of self-harm or harm to others
* Any recent attempts of self-harm
* Mood changes such as an increase in aggressive or unusual behaviour, irritability, agitation or worsening of depressive symptom.
http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/BHCV2/bhcmed.nsf/pages/smcluvox/$File/smcluvox.pdf
Another triumph for the pill-pushing quacks of modern psychiatry.
[/quote]

Wait, wait, wait.
Those side effects are symptoms of depression.
So, you're depressed enough to consider suicide, and to be prescribed medication X.  Later, you try to kill yourself.
Maybe the true side effect is the medication not working on everyone that takes it.

Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Marnoot on April 15, 2009, 11:54:18 AM
Maybe the true side effect is the medication not working on everyone that takes it.

*DingDingDingDingDing!*

Correlation does not imply causation.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: K Frame on April 15, 2009, 02:14:10 PM
"The warning signs include:
* Thoughts or talk of death or suicide
* Thoughts or talk of self-harm or harm to others
* Any recent attempts of self-harm
* Mood changes such as an increase in aggressive or unusual behaviour, irritability, agitation or worsening of depressive symptom."

Funny...

There are any number of sources that give those exact same symptoms as being the danger signs of UNTREATED depression.

MY GOD! HE'S GOT UNTREATED DEPRESSION, HE MIGHT KILL US ALL!!

sounds a lot like

MY GOD! HE'S BEING TREATED FOR DEPRESSION! HE MIGHT KILL US ALL!

doesn't it?
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: S. Williamson on April 15, 2009, 02:16:28 PM
What answer did you formulate?....
4kg human head traveling at 10cm/sec in a path intersecting a 1kg locker door at rest, with unknown variables including "bad day" factored in.  I should've been hit with a Physics book.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: 280plus on April 15, 2009, 02:20:22 PM
Quote
MY GOD! HE'S GOT UNTREATED DEPRESSION, HE MIGHT KILL US ALL!!

sounds a lot like

MY GOD! HE'S BEING TREATED FOR DEPRESSION! HE MIGHT KILL US ALL!

doesn't it?
Paradoxical.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: freedom lover on April 15, 2009, 05:35:26 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-04-13-columbine-myths_N.htm?se=yahoorefer

 Contrary to early reports, Harris and Klebold weren't on antidepressant medication and didn't target jocks, blacks or Christians, police now say, citing the killers' journals and witness accounts.[/i]

That's funny. My school had an assembly called Rachel's Challenge (after Rachel Scott). We saw a video with the lecture, part of which contained an interview with an eyewitness. The guy said they taunted one of his black friends before shooting him. And who wouldn't target jocks?

The whole point of Rachel's Challenge was to teach students to use kindness to make others feel better and hopefully avert tragedies (including suicide). Being friendly might work to stop the occaisional angry outcast type, but it will not work on the real maniacs.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Ned Hamford on April 15, 2009, 05:38:39 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_KUkrukx5M

I give people candy and cupcakes all the time... just to be safe.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Matthew Carberry on April 15, 2009, 06:52:20 PM
Hate to admit it, but same situation here.  Had zero interest in guns at the time, though... thought Bud K knives (ack) were awesome, but never bought any.

Thought it was hilarious when we sat around one day trying to figure out what we'd do if that happened at our school.  The general consensus was (we were nerds, after all) "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few/one" and figured that we'd stop the shooters by any means necessary.   This actually ended up being where I got my first taste in unconventional melee tactics and weapons.  Explaining to my parents exactly how I got hit in the face with a math book, twice, was tricky.

"I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons & Dragons without learning a little something about courage Agent Scully."


(X-Files episode "Jose Chung's From Out of Space")
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: S. Williamson on April 15, 2009, 10:22:36 PM
Just spat cookie crumbs onto my keyboard.  =D  :laugh:
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Strings on April 16, 2009, 12:40:40 AM
>I give people candy and cupcakes all the time... just to be safe.<

Where are mine, Sunshine? You're a lil' behind there... :P
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: Matthew Carberry on April 16, 2009, 02:40:35 AM
*DingDingDingDingDing!*

Correlation does not imply causation.

Actually it can, it doesn't prove it though.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: AJ Dual on April 16, 2009, 09:34:12 AM
The whole point of Rachel's Challenge was to teach students to use kindness to make others feel better and hopefully avert tragedies (including suicide). Being friendly might work to stop the occaisional angry outcast type, but it will not work on the real maniacs.

IMO, "being nice" can backfire. I certainly was never angry, or picked on during those years. However, I can certainly relate to depression, feeling invisible, and outcast.

The bright shiny happy popular people who were nice and friendly to you in passing in the hall, or next to you in class were worse than being ignored, when after a brief surge of hope, you realized it didn't really mean anything other than that you're a generic sounding board for their need to be nice.

After that realization, the bright bubbly, camp-counselor type of pretty girl who'd chat you up was like nails on a blackboard, because she was no more a friend or a potential love interest than another girl who ignored you completely. It's like being a homeless third-world kid given a five minute tour of an American mansion decorated for Christmas, then dumped back into your slum.
Title: Re: Story of Columbine shootings greatly exaggerated
Post by: SteveS on April 16, 2009, 06:05:12 PM
droogs were a factor?

According to the article, no.  They weren't on anti-depressants.

Quote
Does this matter? Really, does it matter?

It matters in the sense that all the people that were trying to blame guns, video games, medication, etc. were wrong, as were the knee-jerk officials that pushed through all sorts of legislation.