Armed Polite Society
Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: Desertdog on April 27, 2009, 11:20:59 PM
-
The Conservative talk show host are finally starting to become organized. Hopefully it will stop some of the nonsense coming out of Washinton.
Nation's talkers meet on 'imminent threat'
Top hosts hold unprecedented summit to stop efforts at government control
WorldNetDaily
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96260
WASHINGTON – Putting aside their own competitive interests, representatives of more than two dozen of the nation's top talk shows held an unprecedented private meeting over the weekend to brainstorm strategies against what they agreed are government plans by to squelch critical political speech on radio.
Organized by Brad O'Leary, author of the new book, "Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech," and Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, the group chose one attendee to be spokesman and chairman of the coalition – syndicated host Roger Hedgecock of San Diego.
A daylong discussion today focused on what was described as the "imminent threat" of so-called "localism" requirements that will subject radio programming to the review by panels of community activists who will evaluate station content. These panels will be empowered to make recommendations for programming changes and challenge at the Federal Communications Commission the licenses renewals of stations that don't heed their advice.
Last month, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., submitted an amendment to the D.C. Voting Bill which would require the FCC to "encourage and promote diversity in ... media ownership" and reaffirm FCC authority to mandate the presentation "of opposing points of view on issues of public importance."
Also of concern to the hosts and producers gathered in the nation's capital was a decision last week by Clear Channel, the nation's largest owner of radio stations, to mandate the creation of local advisory boards by June at all of its properties. The move was seen as pre-emptive as the industry anticipates an FCC stacked with Barack Obama appointees will soon require stations to answer to panels of community activists.
It's time to put up or shut up, America. Literally. Get the book that shows how to fight the assault on your freedom of speech!
In February, the FCC floated several proposals to require stations to better serve local communities, including establishing community advisory boards to consult stations on programming.
"We are materially increasing our commitment to community programming, increasing our accountability and broadening our public-service contributions in every local market we serve," said John Hogan, president and chief executive officer of Clear Channel. "We believe when radio focuses on servicing local communities, it is radio at its finest."
Going forward, Clear Channel stations will be required to air a total of 12 minutes of public service announcements daily and 84 minutes per week. Community leaders will be invited to submit information for future PSAs. In addition, the company will choose one national cause to be highlighted company-wide each quarter for coordinated campaigns.
The FCC is currently composed of two Democrat and two Republican commissioners. Obama has nominated a new chairman, Julius Genachowski, which would give Democrats a 3-2 majority once he is confirmed.
As WND previously reported, Genachowski advocates creating new media ownership rules that promote a diversity of voices on the airwaves. In fact, Genachowski is credited with helping craft the Obama technology agenda, which states: "Encourage diversity in the ownership of broadcast media, promote the development of new media outlets for expression of diverse viewpoints, and clarify the public interest obligations of broadcasters who occupy the nation's spectrum."
"Such language is bureaucratese for government control," says O'Leary. "So-called 'public interest' requirements would put broadcasters at the mercy of local review boards. Such boards would, of course, be politically charged entities with the power to bar any broadcast content that is not deemed to be in the 'public interest' of the local community."
O'Leary says the plan amounts to the development of party-approved "commissar committees" to censor the kind of lively and free-wheeling debate America has known since the scrapping of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" by President Reagan's Federal Communications Commission in 1987.
By demanding radio stations answer to local community watchdog boards to ensure programming is "balanced," "fair," "diverse," "tolerant" and "serving the public interest locally," O'Leary says the rules and legislation being planned will once again make talk radio accountable to politicians, political activists and bureaucrats at the FCC.
Hedgecock, also a WND columnist, called for the creation of a national "tea party-style" grass-roots movement to subvert plans he and the other participants agreed were direct, frontal assaults on First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
A website was created to serve as a clearinghouse of information on the threat to talk radio under the name American Radio Free Speech.
In addition, Farah launched a petition campaign months ago to block federal government attacks on freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
Representatives of the FCC and the Obama administration were unavailable for comment over the weekend.
-
Web site referred to in the article.
http://www.americanradiofreespeech.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.resources
-
In addition, the company will choose one national cause to be highlighted company-wide each quarter for coordinated campaigns.
Causes:
-Nationwide CCW reciprocity.
-Closing the border.
-Tea Party tax-stopping.
-Fighting Real ID.
(I can go on...)
"So-called 'public interest' requirements would put broadcasters at the mercy of local review boards. Such boards would, of course, be politically charged entities with the power to bar any broadcast content that is not deemed to be in the 'public interest' of the local community."
Heck, such a community board overseeing KFYI (the local Rush/Hannity affiliate) would have ample community support to push the above agendas.
But... I guess ACORN would probably need to "organize" our "community" in some sort of politically acceptable way. =D
Sigh. I'll have to get into HAM radio. Do you think Rush would ditch AM and go HAM? He couldn't sell air time, but his web site real estate could become more valuable as a result. Probably not... where do you go if they attack AM and "broadcasting?" Webcasting? Back to print in the form of magazine subscription?
-
Anyone have a good take on how the "fairness doctrine" in whatever name it comes up in would affect Sirius/XM?
-
Sigh. I'll have to get into HAM radio. Do you think Rush would ditch AM and go HAM? He couldn't sell air time, but his web site real estate could become more valuable as a result. Probably not... where do you go if they attack AM and "broadcasting?" Webcasting? Back to print in the form of magazine subscription?
The Web is under attack, too: http://www.armedpolitesociety.com/index.php?topic=19265.0
-
Wow. No host-bashing yet?
-
The first step toward being a slave is to wonder how you can make the chains feel more comfortable.
Just say F--- No.