Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Perd Hapley on May 31, 2010, 07:59:11 PM

Title: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: Perd Hapley on May 31, 2010, 07:59:11 PM: The media is all agog that "Sequel in the City" only came in 3rd this weekend, beaten by the fourth installment of a worn-out troll franchise. Now maybe I'm just a genius, but it seems obvious that if your movie has "sex" in the title, Official Family Holiday weekend is not going to work out for you. :facepalm:
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: MechAg94 on May 31, 2010, 09:05:55 PM: I've actually heard people say it was pretty bad, but I haven't seen it. Not planning to.
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: 280plus on May 31, 2010, 10:23:24 PM: What the movie industry fails to understand is that lots of pepole have sex and couldn't care less about what those three braods are doing with their bits and pieces. Thye're all kind of ugly too if you ask me. >:D

:lol:
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: MicroBalrog on May 31, 2010, 10:40:09 PM: Was the original successful commercially?
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: Perd Hapley on May 31, 2010, 10:51:53 PM: According to:

http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2008/SEXCT.php

the first film was number one for most of the first week of its release. Interestingly, the same website lists the sequel as being number one for Thurs. and Fri., but then dropping into third after that.
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: Harold Tuttle on May 31, 2010, 11:02:24 PM: (https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpremium1.uploadit.org%2FdocZox%2F%2FSaraJFootface.jpg&hash=a2bb8a97f8007673d572f51d3c02393c195fa9dc)
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: roo_ster on May 31, 2010, 11:05:52 PM: Quote from: Harold Tuttle on May 31, 2010, 11:02:24 PM
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpremium1.uploadit.org%2FdocZox%2F%2FSaraJFootface.jpg&hash=a2bb8a97f8007673d572f51d3c02393c195fa9dc)

Missus Matthew Broaderfoot.
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: 280plus on June 01, 2010, 12:21:05 AM: Yea especially THAT one. :O
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: Jim147 on June 01, 2010, 01:01:17 AM: She looks better in a moose costume.

jim
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 01, 2010, 01:21:32 AM: Furry alert!
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: tyme on June 01, 2010, 07:08:46 AM: Quote from: Fistful on May 31, 2010, 07:59:11 PM
The media is all agog that "Sequel in the City" only came in 3rd this weekend, beaten by the fourth installment of a worn-out troll franchise. Now maybe I'm just a genius, but it seems obvious that if your movie has "sex" in the title, Official Family Holiday weekend is not going to work out for you. :facepalm:

I don't think "sex" in the title has much to do with it.

The movie is absolutely horrible. Haven't seen it, but a movie doesn't get 3.5 on IMDB (after a few thousand votes) and 15% on rottentomatoes without something going horribly, horribly wrong.
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: sanglant on June 02, 2010, 01:23:26 AM: Quote from: roo_ster on May 31, 2010, 11:05:52 PM
Missus Matthew Broaderfoot.
i thought it was proudfeets? [popcorn] proudfoots?
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: Doggy Daddy on June 02, 2010, 06:52:23 AM: Quote
i thought it was proudfeets? proudfoots?

We talkin' about "The Hobbit" now?

DD
Title: Re: I'm no movie producer, but...
Post by: sanglant on June 02, 2010, 07:25:20 AM: yeah, sorry about that. forgot ~~where~~ when i was. =)