Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: AZRedhawk44 on July 12, 2011, 03:37:18 PM

Title: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on July 12, 2011, 03:37:18 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20078789-503544.html

Quote
"After years of discussions and months of negotiations, I have little question that as long as this president is in the Oval Office, a real solution is probably unattainable," Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said in remarks on the Senate floor.

Still, McConnell said Republicans would "do the responsible thing" to avoid default, suggesting that a deal on the debt ceiling could be reached without a "real" deficit reduction package.

"The president has presented us with three choices: smoke and mirrors, tax hikes, or default. Republicans choose none of the above. I had hoped to do good, but I refuse to do harm. So Republicans will choose a path that actually reflects the will of the people, which is to do the responsible thing and ensure that the government doesn't default on its obligations," he said.

No.  No.  No.

Dear sweet fluffybunnykittehs, no.

McConnell wants to let the children get their way, because it's just too hard to do the right thing.

Eff ewe, McConnell. 


Obama stands there and says old people won't get their SS checks and will be eating cat food if there is no debt deal by August 2, and the Stoopid Party rolls over and exposes their soft spots to get stabbed by the Dems.

Argh.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on July 12, 2011, 03:40:22 PM
Also of interest in the article:

Quote
Mr. Obama has repeatedly said he wants a deal that would allow the U.S. to avoid confronting the issue again until after the 2012 elections and vowed on Monday that he would "not sign a 30-day or a 60-day or a 90-day extension."

Can you believe the gall of this guy?

God forbid he be accountable for his policies during election season. ;/
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: MicroBalrog on July 12, 2011, 03:51:36 PM
How did McConnel become Senate Majority Leader?

Are they chosen by seniority? Or was there a vote?
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on July 12, 2011, 03:55:11 PM
He's not Majority Leader.

He's the Republican Leader.  Also known as the Minority Leader right now, though that title really only has meaning in a 2-party system.

The more these wimpy blue-blood GOP folk talk, the more it appears we need a 3rd party... making the concept of Majority/Minority leadership moot.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: sanglant on July 12, 2011, 04:02:03 PM
we need a runoff leadership system*, the dems want a week minority leader then they can risk voting for them instead of the majority leader. >:D

*most votes, majority leader. second most votes, minority leader. one vote per congresscritter. :laugh:
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: HankB on July 12, 2011, 04:54:29 PM
. . . Obama stands there and says old people won't get their SS checks and will be eating cat food if there is no debt deal by August 2, and the Stoopid Party rolls over and exposes their soft spots to get stabbed by the Dems.
Obama's comments really are a golden opportunity - the GOP really could make a heck of a political point out of this . . . "Obama's VERY FIRST CHOICE is to starve our seniors while he continues to spend on foreign aid/Federal hiring/diversity programs/windmills/etc."

But they won't.  :facepalm:

They're The Stoopid PartyTM.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: MicroBalrog on July 12, 2011, 05:08:48 PM
He's not Majority Leader.

He's the Republican Leader.  Also known as the Minority Leader right now, though that title really only has meaning in a 2-party system.

The more these wimpy blue-blood GOP folk talk, the more it appears we need a 3rd party... making the concept of Majority/Minority leadership moot.

YEah, sorry. Got my terms confused. How does the minority leader get chosen?
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on July 12, 2011, 05:11:42 PM
YEah, sorry. Got my terms confused. How does the minority leader get chosen?

Voted upon by the minority party.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: longeyes on July 12, 2011, 05:51:19 PM
Someone needs to tell him he's signing the death warrant of the Republican Party if he does that.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on July 12, 2011, 06:26:19 PM
The other thing that irks me is ANYONE from the Senate having the bawlz to even open their damned mouths about this issue, without first having a bill originated in the House upon which the Senate shall base their work:

Quote from: that pesky Constitution thing, Article 1
Section. 7.

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Debt instruments are a means of raising Revenue.  This debt debate is about authorizing the Treasury to monetize additional debt instruments.

STFU, Senate.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft3.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcRx2ZFMwMz0w1cj6HH_ET0jFG09k4efpvAQDEi_8brqJlo7eVzA&hash=f321d99642fbcfb905012fd14a5c0270eb6cc382)
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: kgbsquirrel on July 12, 2011, 06:29:44 PM
I went searching for an appropriate facepalm for this level of Stupid and found this one. It seems strangely appropriate on several levels.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ZG3hQEiY8zc%2FTZG0mwD-l6I%2FAAAAAAAACm4%2F4bnHAvQIW9A%2Fs1600%2FThird-party-facepalm.jpg&hash=d9bcb767ba36686236371e645c801876643db6c5)
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: roo_ster on July 12, 2011, 06:34:40 PM
YEah, sorry. Got my terms confused. How does the minority leader get chosen?

Obviously, they put potential Senators through a battery of rigorous tests of intelligence, character, civics, and charisma and then choose the absolute lowest-score as the winner.

Or, maybe not.  The result sure looks the same, though.

<deam_time>Would that Kentucky's OTHER senator were minority leader</dream_time>
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: longeyes on July 12, 2011, 07:16:17 PM
"Stupidity" is much too kind for these traitorous whores.  Let's call it what it really is.   First McConnell says he can't deal with this President, then, unaccountably, he throws him a life preserver, hauls him aboard, and hands him the exclusive keys to the pilothouse.  He appears ready to cede vast Congressional power to the Executive.  Why?  Stupidity?  I really don't think so.  Maybe McConnell is afraid of facing the people if Obama goes ahead and tries to stop Social Security payments?  The man is too feckless to represent anyone, much less lead.  We need fighters, not "negotiators."

It is all unraveling, and, frankly, it needs to.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on July 12, 2011, 07:27:47 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/mcconnells-plan-confuses-the-chattering-class/2011/03/29/gIQAxEAGBI_blog.html?hpid=z3
If you go onto Twitter or check some Web sites (right and left) you will find loads of chatter about the McConnell debt disapproval plan. Most of it is wrong. Members of the chattering class are so anxious to chatter that they feel compelled to do so without understanding the subject matter at hand. Throw in some bad faith (certain right-wing bloggers would declare the GOP leadership traitors if they proposed only $4 trillion in cuts and got President Obama to decline to run for reelection), add in some liberal suspicion (warranted since this is not the first time that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has eaten their lunch), and presto: You get some of the worst “reporting” in recent memory.

                                                                 more


an alternative opinion
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: Waitone on July 12, 2011, 09:55:53 PM
After the election I proposed a scenario whereby we would know in 6 months whether or not there will be a viable republican party in the future depending on how it dealt with Obama and his party members.  The TEA party types breathed life into a dead republican establishment.  If establishment republicans reverted to type the TEA party types would simply decline to support it.  So far Boehner seems to have grown a spine; McConnell doesn't feel the same heat as does Boehner.  The one time in the last month I've listened to Limbaugh he was pontificating that one man stands between Obama and reelection and that is Boehner.  Give Obama the grand deal and Obama wins because it takes one of his two biggest failings off the table.  I find myself in agreement.  And if Boehner caves my original schedule looks prophetic.

Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: MechAg94 on July 12, 2011, 10:55:25 PM
After the election I proposed a scenario whereby we would know in 6 months whether or not there will be a viable republican party in the future depending on how it dealt with Obama and his party members.  The TEA party types breathed life into a dead republican establishment.  If establishment republicans reverted to type the TEA party types would simply decline to support it.  So far Boehner seems to have grown a spine; McConnell doesn't feel the same heat as does Boehner.  The one time in the last month I've listened to Limbaugh he was pontificating that one man stands between Obama and reelection and that is Boehner.  Give Obama the grand deal and Obama wins because it takes one of his two biggest failings off the table.  I find myself in agreement.  And if Boehner caves my original schedule looks prophetic.


If Boehner caves, he can forget gaining any more seats in Congress and might not get reelected himself.  Rush mentioned that public opinion is trending far in favor of NOT increasing the debt limit and FOR cutting spending.  If Boehner bucks that trend, he is a fool. 

Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: longeyes on July 13, 2011, 12:26:17 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/mcconnells-plan-confuses-the-chattering-class/2011/03/29/gIQAxEAGBI_blog.html?hpid=z3
If you go onto Twitter or check some Web sites (right and left) you will find loads of chatter about the McConnell debt disapproval plan. Most of it is wrong. Members of the chattering class are so anxious to chatter that they feel compelled to do so without understanding the subject matter at hand. Throw in some bad faith (certain right-wing bloggers would declare the GOP leadership traitors if they proposed only $4 trillion in cuts and got President Obama to decline to run for reelection), add in some liberal suspicion (warranted since this is not the first time that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has eaten their lunch), and presto: You get some of the worst “reporting” in recent memory.

                                                                 more


an alternative opinion

So you're of the mind that Mitch McConnell is just snookering those leftist rubes, huh?  I heard Jim DeMint saying McConnell's plan would go nowhere.  I hope he's right.  Obama has his back to the wall, and McConnell wants to throw down his arms and retreat.  That's how it looks from here.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: Waitone on July 13, 2011, 09:53:03 AM
Looks to me like McConnell just had his Gresham Barrett moment.  He is through.  His is just not reading the TEA leaves.  McConnell is just another establishment republican who is clueless as to what is happening out here in Hicksville USA.  I think he just ensured he will joint Orin Hatch and Dick Lugar in spending more time with their families.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: zxcvbob on July 13, 2011, 10:48:08 PM
Looks to me like McConnell just had his Gresham Barrett moment.  He is through.  His is just not reading the TEA leaves.  McConnell is just another establishment republican who is clueless as to what is happening out here in Hicksville USA.  I think he just ensured he will joint Orin Hatch and Dick Lugar in spending more time with their families.
I was thinking his Neville Chamberlain moment.  [barf]
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: longeyes on July 14, 2011, 11:36:25 AM
When is Pixar going to do an animated version of these characters? :facepalm:
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on July 14, 2011, 02:48:18 PM
Grahamnesty has weighed in on the debt issue:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/07/14/politics/main20079379.shtml

Quote from: Grahamnesty
"Our problem is, we made a big deal about this for three months," Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told The New York Times, illustrating the difficult position in which senior Republicans find themselves.

"How many Republicans have been on TV saying, 'I am not going to raise the debt limit,'" Graham told the newspaper, including himself among the GOP members dealing with the seemingly no-win situation. "We have no one to blame but ourselves."

How about you actually stick to your promises?

What a Grahamhole.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: seeker_two on July 14, 2011, 03:16:07 PM
http://www.ronpaul.com/2011-07-14/conviction-not-compromise-ron-pauls-first-2012-tv-ad/

...and, with Ron Paul's new ad, it'll really be an albatross around the neck of the GOP leaders....

Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: Waitone on July 14, 2011, 05:16:21 PM
Quote
Quote from: Grahamnesty
"Our problem is, we made a big deal about this for three months," Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina told The New York Times, illustrating the difficult position in which senior Republicans find themselves.

"How many Republicans have been on TV saying, 'I am not going to raise the debt limit,'" Graham told the newspaper, including himself among the GOP members dealing with the seemingly no-win situation. "We have no one to blame but ourselves."
See how much easier life you be if you just didn't stand for anything.  No principals, no belief, no guiding lights and you've got maximum flexibility.  I hope Graham finds a new gig cause he won't survive the next election.
Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: Boomhauer on July 14, 2011, 05:22:50 PM
Quote
I hope Graham finds a new gig cause he won't survive the next election.

Every election I hope for that and every election my fellow voters send him back to Washington...

Title: Re: Senate Republican Leader basically says GOP should fold over debt issue
Post by: sanglant on July 14, 2011, 11:05:10 PM
When is Pixar going to do an animated version of these characters? :facepalm:
not Pixar, but here you are (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXZY_XRjABs). i'll leave the casting to you. :angel: [popcorn]