Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Perd Hapley on August 24, 2011, 10:44:55 AM

Title: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 24, 2011, 10:44:55 AM
So I'm trying to send an email to a couple of people with my work email account. Naturally, I type the first address into the box, comma, the second address. Since the beginning of time, this has worked with any email system I have used. But it doesn't work here. It, apparently, thinks that I have entered one long, misformatted address. This offends me into a state of low dudgeon, but I remain calm and attempt to cut and paste the second address into the CC box. Oh, no. Outlook Web Access will have none of this. Cut? No. Copy? Not allowed. Backspacing, deleting or otherwise editing the addresses I've entered? It shall not be. All I can do is erase them and type them over again.

This raises me to a state of medium dudgeon, which is a terrible thing to behold.

The computer survived.

Thank you for reading this rant, which has been brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: wmenorr67 on August 24, 2011, 11:03:23 AM
Well at least it was your fault.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: RevDisk on August 24, 2011, 11:07:37 AM
Control + C to copy.  Control + V to paste.

Click on the To button, and search for each person, is easiest unless you do your addresses in notepad.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Nick1911 on August 24, 2011, 11:28:23 AM
Click on the To button, and search for each person, is easiest unless you do your addresses in notepad.

Indeed.  Also, outlook regards commas as simple characters - not delimiters.  Use the semicolon to delimit addresses.

Where I work, we can actually use proper names in outlook and it'll resolve the email from them.  So something like "Smith,Jeff; Smith,Jane" will work
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: roo_ster on August 24, 2011, 11:29:19 AM
Friends don't let friends use MS Outlook.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 24, 2011, 11:37:01 AM
Control + C to copy.  Control + V to paste.

Click on the To button, and search for each person, is easiest unless you do your addresses in notepad.

I don't know why, but most of my various email servers don't store my contacts. So I'm in the habit of typing them out or just replying to something unrelated they sent me in the past.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 24, 2011, 11:38:03 AM
Indeed.  Also, outlook regards commas as simple characters - not delimiters.  Use the semicolon to delimit addresses.

Well that was a brilliant move.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on August 24, 2011, 11:39:12 AM
Nick beat me to it.  Semicolon.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: HeroHog on August 24, 2011, 01:54:17 PM
Outlook is all I use. I am using MS Office Pro 2007 and am very happy with it. I needed something powerful because of the high number of email accounts I have on my several web domains and Outlook allows me to handle them all through a single interface with a well managed system of folders and rules automation that make my life MUCH easier given the volume of messages I deal with on a daily basis.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: 41magsnub on August 24, 2011, 02:03:14 PM
Friends don't let friends use MS Outlook.

How very helpful!
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Scout26 on August 24, 2011, 04:30:17 PM
And I think there's a way to get it to recognize the comma as a separator.  I had to use MS Outhouse Outlook at one place I worked at and remember fiddling with it, until it was okay to use comma's.  I also managed to change the standard disclaimer tagline on every outgoing e-mail in the company.  I only changed two words, but it made it extremely snarky, and no one noticed for 6+ months. 
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: MrsSmith on August 24, 2011, 08:15:54 PM
Thank you for reading this rant, which has been brought to you by Carl's Jr.

There's no Carl's Jr. in MO.

And I've always used a semi-colon between email addresses, thought that was standard.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on August 24, 2011, 08:18:21 PM
There's no Carl's Jr. in MO.

And I've always used a semi-colon between email addresses, thought that was standard.


Isn't Hardee's big out in the Midwest?  Same chain.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Hawkmoon on August 24, 2011, 08:18:43 PM
Indeed.  Also, outlook regards commas as simple characters - not delimiters.  Use the semicolon to delimit addresses.

Where I work, we can actually use proper names in outlook and it'll resolve the email from them.  So something like "Smith,Jeff; Smith,Jane" will work

But only if "Smith, Jeff," and "Smith, Jane" are entered into your system as users or addressees, right? If you're on the phone with an "outsider" named Georgiadis Xylophonis, who has never ever had any previous dealing with your organization, is your Otlook going to reach out and scour the Internet until it finds an e-mail address for "Xylophonis, Georgiadis"? And if it does, how will it know if you should use Georgie from Atlanta or Georgie from Seattle?
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 24, 2011, 10:37:19 PM
Mrs Smith, the Carl's Jr. reference is from Idiocracy. Which is also required viewing for APS.  :police:


Isn't Hardee's big out in the Midwest?  Same chain.

Or at least they are related. I don't think I've ever been to a Carl's Jr.

Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: MrsSmith on August 25, 2011, 12:58:36 AM
Mrs Smith, the Carl's Jr. reference is from Idiocracy. Which is also required viewing for APS.  :police:


Or at least they are related. I don't think I've ever been to a Carl's Jr.

OMG! Could I just get a *expletive deleted*ing list of the required viewing materials already?

Never been to Carl's Jr? Meh, other than it being kind of a late-night drunken greasy cheeseburger kind of SoCal icon hangout there really isn't much that sets it apart from others.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas on August 25, 2011, 01:12:40 AM
OMG! Could I just get a *expletive deleted*ing list of the required viewing materials already?
Zardoz (on Netflix instant)
Firefly/Serenity
The Hebrew Hammer (on hulu)
Idiocracy
Demolition Man. "Murder death kill!" And this scene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pSEMNEqQJI&feature=related) among others.
And many more.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: BridgeRunner on August 25, 2011, 01:17:35 AM
Zardoz (on Netflix instant)

For the love of god, man, give the woman a little warning or something.  She needs to have a good supply of brain-bleach on hand before embarking on that mission.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Doggy Daddy on August 25, 2011, 01:32:21 AM
Never been to Carl's Jr? Meh, other than it being kind of a late-night drunken greasy cheeseburger kind of SoCal icon hangout there really isn't much that sets it apart from others.

Except that they seem to put barbeque sauce on EVERYthing!

DD
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Scout26 on August 25, 2011, 01:46:15 AM
Pulp Fiction
Boondock Saints
John Wayne Movies
Idiocracy
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on August 25, 2011, 01:54:52 AM
Pulp Fiction
Boondock Saints
John Wayne Movies
Idiocracy


Fixed to eliminate stoopidness.  John Wayne sucks as an actor.  He's a role-player.  Original old school D&D, just a cowboy instead of a lawful-good paladin with +2 dexterity. ;/
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 25, 2011, 02:17:26 AM
Zardoz (on Netflix instant)
Firefly/Serenity
The Hebrew Hammer (on hulu)
Idiocracy
Demolition Man. "Murder death kill!" And this scene (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pSEMNEqQJI&feature=related) among others.
And many more.

 :laugh:  So the answer is "No."

Oh, MrsSmith, you must also be conversant in man-purses, have a preference for one operating system or text editor, over another, and many more...
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: BryanP on August 25, 2011, 06:55:53 AM
As someone who is being forced to leave Groupwise and move to Outlook Web Access / Exchange I feel your pain. I've been on it a couple of weeks now and it's usable, but definitely missing features I was used to having.

The #1 feature I miss: the ability to look at the properties of an email and see the status of each recipient, "read", "replied", "forwarded", "deleted" etc.. *sigh*
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: mtnbkr on August 25, 2011, 07:04:57 AM
After 10 years with Lotus Notes, I'm very happy to be using Outlook.  I practically live in Outlook these days. 

Chris
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Jamie B on August 25, 2011, 08:40:11 AM
After entering a name or partial name in Outhouse, hit <Control + K> , which will bring up a list of possible names.

I hit <Enter> after each name in order to enter the next one.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: GigaBuist on August 25, 2011, 10:53:34 AM
He's using Outlook WEB Access, so most of these tips and tricks won't fly.  It's close to Outlook but not the same.

Fistful, my advice is to only use IE with OWA.  It doesn't play nice with other browsers.  Gives me merry hob with Chrome.

After 10 years with Lotus Notes, I'm very happy to be using Outlook.

10 years of Lotus Notes would make me yearn for anything.  Hell, I'd take Herpes over Notes.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Tallpine on August 25, 2011, 10:57:28 AM
Quote
Never been to Carl's Jr? Meh, other than it being kind of a late-night drunken greasy cheeseburger kind of SoCal icon hangout there really isn't much that sets it apart from others.

I had never heard of them either before serving a three month sentence of software labor in Santa Clarita earlier this year.  =(
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: 41magsnub on August 25, 2011, 11:06:14 AM


10 years of Lotus Notes would make me yearn for anything.  Hell, I'd take Herpes over Notes.

I thought they were a package deal?

I've been supporting north of 40 exchange servers for over 10 years now and liked the OWA progression.  For OWA (Outlook Web App) now instead of Outlook Web Access, the latest versions are much better.  OWA 2003 was the first one that was actually usable, 2007 was better, now 2010 is pretty danged good.  Not the full outlook 2010 client, but not bad at all.  I do ok with firefox in OWA as long as I don't need to go into public folders which require IE.

We've started reselling the MS hosted Office365 product and have about 35 users on it amongst a few companies.  Depending on the package the folks can use outlook 2007 or 2010 they already own, office 2010 professional plus as a subscription, or web app only which has the web versions of the basic office apps in addition to OWA.  Folks have been pretty happy with it so far in the 2 months it has been live despite the outage for several hours (one of the dangers of "cloud" computing).  We will be moving to it internally as soon as we figure out a couple of things with our CRM package.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 25, 2011, 02:14:33 PM
He's using Outlook WEB Access, so most of these tips and tricks won't fly.  It's close to Outlook but not the same.

Fistful, my advice is to only use IE with OWA.  It doesn't play nice with other browsers.  Gives me merry hob with Chrome.

That's a good point. I was using an IE tab in Firefox.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: grislyatoms on August 25, 2011, 02:17:08 PM
So I'm trying to send an email to a couple of people with my work email account. Naturally, I type the first address into the box, comma, the second address. Since the beginning of time, this has worked with any email system I have used. But it doesn't work here. It, apparently, thinks that I have entered one long, misformatted address. This offends me into a state of low dudgeon, but I remain calm and attempt to cut and paste the second address into the CC box. Oh, no. Outlook Web Access will have none of this. Cut? No. Copy? Not allowed. Backspacing, deleting or otherwise editing the addresses I've entered? It shall not be. All I can do is erase them and type them over again.

This raises me to a state of medium dudgeon, which is a terrible thing to behold.

The computer survived.

Thank you for reading this rant, which has been brought to you by Carl's Jr.
Web client versions of most local apps tend to be crap. It's an industry standard.  =D
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: roo_ster on August 25, 2011, 03:59:40 PM
OMG! Could I just get a *expletive deleted*ing list of the required viewing materials already?

Hey, who let this joker in?!?!

After 10 years with Lotus Notes, I'm very happy to be using Outlook.  I practically live in Outlook these days. 

Chris

Notus Bloats is a tool of the Devil.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: MrsSmith on August 25, 2011, 05:10:43 PM
Thanks for the list. Have seen Pulp Fiction, Boondock Saints, Demolition Man and many John Wayne movies. Firefly marathon begins tonight.

Does that count for anything?
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: grislyatoms on August 25, 2011, 05:15:02 PM
Edgar Friendly's monologue in "Demolition Man" definitely counts. And "Firefly" of course. :lol:
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: grislyatoms on August 25, 2011, 05:21:15 PM
Edgar Friendly: "You see, according to Cocteau's plan, I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think; I like to read.
I'm into freedom of speech and freedom of choice. I'm the kind of guy who likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecued ribs with the side order of gravy fries?"
I WANT high cholesterol. I wanna eat bacon and butter and BUCKETS of cheese, okay?
I want to smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section.
I want to run through the streets naked with green Jell-o all over my body reading Playboy magazine.
Why?
Because I suddenly might feel the need to, okay, pal?
 I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is?
It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiener".
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: grislyatoms on August 25, 2011, 05:24:04 PM
One of the best rants of all time, right there. Back to your normally scheduled fistfulness.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: wmenorr67 on August 25, 2011, 05:38:47 PM
Thanks for the list. Have seen Pulp Fiction, Boondock Saints, Demolition Man and many John Wayne movies. Firefly marathon begins tonight.

Does that count for anything?

I would add Fight Club to the list also.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on August 25, 2011, 05:39:43 PM
And Army of Darkness.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: MrsSmith on August 25, 2011, 07:43:29 PM
Added it.

I would add Fight Club to the list also.

But I thought--
Oh. Never mind.


Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Perd Hapley on August 25, 2011, 08:18:33 PM
To my knowledge, Master Leary has not yet appeared in public wearing only green Jell-o. Until he rescinds his threat to do so, it may be safest to remain indoors, or perhaps to track him by some method, to avoid proximity. Let us look into this matter.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas on August 26, 2011, 04:31:50 PM
Thanks for the list. Have seen Pulp Fiction, Boondock Saints, Demolition Man and many John Wayne movies. Firefly marathon begins tonight.

Does that count for anything?
A good beginning. See also Falling Down (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eREiQhBDIk), another great film.
Title: Re: Outlook Web Access - Worthless
Post by: Angel Eyes on August 26, 2011, 05:16:29 PM
Sergio Leone's "Dollars" trilogy, of course.