Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: brimic on June 03, 2012, 02:32:34 PM

Title: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: brimic on June 03, 2012, 02:32:34 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2153229/Celia-Alchemy-Savage-Meet-college-student-loves-blowing-things-up.html

Hawt, likes guns, motorcycles, and detcord.
Unfortunately may like drugs and might be doing time in the federal pen soon...
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: BlueStarLizzard on June 03, 2012, 02:37:59 PM
Meth? I doubt she'll be hawt for long.

Too bad on the exsessive level of crazy. We could have used some more estrogen around here.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Nick1911 on June 03, 2012, 02:39:38 PM
Looks like she only broke victimless laws, really.  In general, aside from being crazy, I don't have any particular ethical problem with her listed activities.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 03, 2012, 02:41:37 PM
As my grandmother used to say, "There's no accounting for taste."

I don't find her at all "hawt," or even especially attractive.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: BlueStarLizzard on June 03, 2012, 03:06:38 PM
Looks like she only broke victimless laws, really.  In general, aside from being crazy, I don't have any particular ethical problem with her listed activities.

Quote
  'Vandalism is as beautiful as a rock in a cop's face.'
Quote
I despise all law enforcement and any governing authority,' she writes. 'I am not one for selective targeting but mass destruction.' 

Between statements like these and putting bomb video's on youtube, i'd say it's not an ethical problem but a brain being missing problem.

On the other hand, gunkid would LOVE her...


Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Nick1911 on June 03, 2012, 03:20:13 PM
Yea, true.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: vaskidmark on June 03, 2012, 05:08:24 PM
Let's take a vote here: which is more reprehensible and ought to result in criminal prosecution -

This girl and her activities, regardless of how stupid she is
or
Some Brit newspaper that uses prhases such as "the pot" and "the meth"?

stay safe.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 03, 2012, 07:17:47 PM
Let's take a vote here: which is more reprehensible and ought to result in criminal prosecution -

This girl and her activities, regardless of how stupid she is
or
Some Brit newspaper that uses prhases such as "the pot" and "the meth"?

stay safe.

Meh. American newspapers are now using words like "gays" and "hoodies." RIP, Journalism.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: seeker_two on June 03, 2012, 09:47:59 PM
Liked her page.... https://m.facebook.com/?refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F&_rdr#!/profile.php?id=301798573244015&slog=1003185111&seq=884712368&rk=3&fbtype=65&__user=100000565520174

....may even friend her.... https://m.facebook.com/?refsrc=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2F&_rdr#!/celia.savage?slog=215327314&seq=431433108&rk=1&st=user&fbtype=2048&__user=100000565520174

....heck, I'd invite here here, too....she's my kind of crazy.... =D
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: RevDisk on June 04, 2012, 09:09:04 AM

Meh, I'll wait for the conviction. Taking the word of a British paper, and police statements, is a bit ... rash. Obviously from her publicized behavior, she enjoyed quite a number of hobbies. Doesn't mean she broke the law, unless someone has photos of her smoking pot or meth.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: roo_ster on June 04, 2012, 10:50:56 AM
Looks like she only broke victimless laws, really.  In general, aside from being crazy, I don't have any particular ethical problem with her listed activities.

I don;t see anythign there that would warrant an arrest.  She has harmed no one.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: dogmush on June 04, 2012, 11:31:13 AM
I have the same model .50BMG as one of the one's she's holding.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Scout26 on June 04, 2012, 04:15:33 PM
I'm with Rev and will wait for a conviction.  This seems to strike me as a "We need to keep our heel on the mouthy ones."
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 04, 2012, 04:24:18 PM
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: vaskidmark on June 04, 2012, 04:30:38 PM
I have the same model .50BMG as one of the one's she's holding.

So, does that mean that you, too, allegedly use illegal drugs and allegedly construct illegal pipe bombs?

I'm pretty sure that would be the inference the government would want me to draw.

stay safe.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: SteveS on June 04, 2012, 08:51:27 PM
As my grandmother used to say, "There's no accounting for taste."

I don't find her at all "hawt," or even especially attractive.

Some posted the 'racy' pictures of her on another site and I had to say that I didn't find her all that attractive.

That being said, I also found her a little odd, but didn't see anything that warranted such a strong police response.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: freakazoid on June 04, 2012, 10:21:15 PM
Quote
but didn't see anything that warranted such a strong police response.

I think this is the reason for the strong police response:
Quote
Stash: Officers allegedly found weapons, including a revolver,
;/
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Jocassee on June 04, 2012, 10:57:59 PM
She would definitely fit in here. Too bad we live in a state that "necessitates" her arrest.

Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: brimic on June 05, 2012, 08:22:21 AM
Quote
I think this is the reason for the strong police response:

Quote
Stash: Officers allegedly found weapons, including a revolver,

A .454 no less :O :O :O :O :O

It feels like a case of the nail sticking up getting pounded down.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: RoadKingLarry on June 05, 2012, 08:34:48 AM
Look at our own collection of guns, accessories and reloading supplies and try to imagine how bad a hostile, anti-gun media could portray you in a hit piece.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: mtnbkr on June 05, 2012, 08:56:44 AM
What about the pipe bombs.  Maybe victimless, but we've targeted people as "terrorists" for similar.

Chris
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: mtnbkr on June 05, 2012, 08:59:55 AM
From the article:
Quote from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2153229/Celia-Alchemy-Savage-Meet-college-student-loves-blowing-things-up.html
Authorities discovered two pipe bombs, a selection of firearms - including a Taurus .454 calibre revolver - suspected illegal drugs - including meth and pot - and drug paraphernalia.

Savage allegedly told an FBI agent she has made up to seven pipe bombs as 'manufacturing explosive devices and detonating them for recreation was her hobby', an ATF report noted.

She added that she likes to blow up toilets in the woods,

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2153229/Celia-Alchemy-Savage-Meet-college-student-loves-blowing-things-up.html#ixzz1wvIjvRmg

If she were a muslim and modified her message to "down with America", I think the response here would be different.  It seems her breasts and guns afford her a different perception.  ;/

Chris
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 05, 2012, 09:19:41 AM
Uh, "down with America" Muslims have murdered thousands of Americans in a series of attacks in just the past fifteen years. So, yeah, I would have a different perception of her.

As it is, she seems to be goofball with anarchist Walter Mitty syndrome. Maybe getting hit with the federal clue-bat will teach her a thing or two - maybe not.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: seeker_two on June 05, 2012, 09:20:20 AM
Look at our own collection of guns, accessories and reloading supplies and try to imagine how bad a hostile, anti-gun media could portray you in a hit piece.

+1.....just from photo evidence alone, Oleg could be charged with organizing an underdressed terrorist movement....  [tinfoil]

Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: RevDisk on June 05, 2012, 09:27:19 AM
Look at our own collection of guns, accessories and reloading supplies and try to imagine how bad a hostile, anti-gun media could portray you in a hit piece.
What about the pipe bombs.  Maybe victimless, but we've targeted people as "terrorists" for similar.

We're targeted people as terrorists for nodding when a planted officer spouted off on blowing up stuff, protesting NATO and quoting Family Guy on Twitter. Not exactly a good rule of thumb anymore. Could be Tannerite, black powder or cannon fuse. Virtually every person has the necessary supplies in their house to make pipe bombs, especially if you have a number of cleaners. Gimme five minutes looking through your house, and I could prove you're a bomb making subversive terrorist.

"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him."

*shrug*

Waiting for the conviction. Though, that's not very telling these days either. She may be guilty, she may be not guilty, she might be guilty of minor stuff with overblown charges to force a plea deal. That last one is near SOP in many locations, from what I understand. Throw the book, and the defendants nearly always plea out to a lesser crime to avoid the possibility of going away for a very long time.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Jamisjockey on June 05, 2012, 10:15:58 AM
Not hot.  A tall glass of meh.
And I see mouth herpes in one of the last pics.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Jamie B on June 05, 2012, 06:59:02 PM
You post *expletive deleted*it on the interwebz, and everybody can see it.

Silence is golden, and requires no federal prison time......
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: RoadKingLarry on June 05, 2012, 09:55:32 PM
Quote
Silence is golden, and requires no federal prison time......

Obviously, since you are invoking your rights guaranteed  under the 5th amendment you have something to hide and must be guilty.

Off to Gitmo with you.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 05, 2012, 10:16:27 PM
You post *expletive deleted* on the interwebz, and everybody can see it.

Silence is golden, and requires no federal prison time......


I don't know. Maybe some of that stuff was posted where only her "friends" could see it, and the feds "befriended" her. She may not be quite as dumb as she looks.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Balog on June 05, 2012, 10:34:14 PM
Admitting crimes to your friends irl is still damned stupid. Doing it online anywhere under any circumstances is borderline retarded.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 05, 2012, 10:42:20 PM

I don't know. Maybe some of that stuff was posted where only her "friends" could see it, and the feds "befriended" her. She may not be quite as dumb as she looks.

There's an old saying that two can keep a secret ... if one of them is dead.

She might not be as dumb as she looks ... or she could be a whole lot dumber.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Perd Hapley on June 05, 2012, 10:44:02 PM
Admitting crimes to your friends irl is still damned stupid. Doing it online anywhere under any circumstances is borderline retarded.

Oh, you mean the explosives? I was thinking of the cop-bashing stuff.

I see your point.
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Scout26 on June 06, 2012, 11:19:07 AM
Getting back to what she was charged with:

Drug (meth) supplies and paraphernalia:  If you have charcoal, drain cleaner and sinus meds, you have meth supplies.  I've also got got surgical clamps that I use for medical purposes (Dialysis patient) along with others for hobbies and household repairs.   The only drugs I have are the ones prescribed.  Never have used an illegal one.

Bomb making materials:  I reload.  Do I need to draw a picture? 

I foresee a plea bargain unless she gets a sharp lawyer who goes on the offensive....


 
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: RoadKingLarry on June 06, 2012, 11:20:28 AM
Quote
There's an old saying that two can keep a secret ... if one of them is dead.

Actually, it's: "Three can keep a secret if two are dead"
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: RevDisk on June 18, 2012, 02:52:58 PM
Admitting crimes to your friends irl is still damned stupid. Doing it online anywhere under any circumstances is borderline retarded.

Or make your crimes so weird, no one will believe them.

Or confess to crimes you could not have committed. 
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Balog on June 18, 2012, 04:16:11 PM
Or confess to crimes in foreign coun tries that don't exist anymore, or that have no extradition treaties with America.  =)
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: RevDisk on June 18, 2012, 04:17:00 PM
Or confess to crimes in foreign coun tries that don't exist anymore, or that have no extradition treaties with America.  =)

BWAHAHHA
Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: French G. on June 19, 2012, 12:23:24 AM
+1.....just from photo evidence alone, Oleg could be charged with organizing an underdressed terrorist movement....  [tinfoil]



I for one welcome our exhibitio... extremist overlords.

Girl is dumber than a box of dull rocks by my estimation. Sure we may like a lot of the same things, but do we plaster our facebook pages with all of this? I'm quite in favor of nice looking ladies, but the ones that put half dressed pics for all the world to see get what they want. Look at me! Look at me! Look at me! Oh crap, who knew the cops were looking at me! And furthermore, she's got bad eyes. Not ugly, the crazy and not all there kind.

Title: Re: Which one of our members is this?
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 19, 2012, 11:22:27 PM
Has anybody seen any updates to this story? All I could find was umpteen gazillion articles all dated 2 June and all echoing/parroting the same story from the time of the arrest.