Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Lee on December 25, 2012, 03:23:00 PM

Title: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Lee on December 25, 2012, 03:23:00 PM
Is being investigated for possessing a 30 round mag on his show Sunday, thus violating DC gun laws.
Irony at its best.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: birdman on December 25, 2012, 03:26:33 PM
Awesome.  I wonder how he got it?  $20 says he drove two miles and bought it in NoVa.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Tallpine on December 25, 2012, 03:30:57 PM
It's a wonder anyone survived  ;/
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: zahc on December 25, 2012, 03:32:50 PM
It's perhaps mean-spirited of me, but part of me does hope that he is convicted, simply because laws should be applied fairly and equally, plus, it may demonstrate some of the absurdity of gun laws to the audience.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: zxcvbob on December 25, 2012, 03:49:03 PM
Investigated by whom?  (just us?) 
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Lee on December 25, 2012, 03:54:21 PM
Sorry I'm not savvy about cutting and pasting link on my phone. It's on the CNN news site.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: AJ Dual on December 25, 2012, 04:06:04 PM
Investigated by whom?  (just us?)  

D.C. PD and DA's office apparently.

I'd be shocked if anything came of it, but it's nice to at least see them acknowledge it happened.

It's the safe bet it'll be swept under the rug due to a lack of intent, but some legit gun owner ignorant of D.C. law, would likely be in a world of legal hurt.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Lee on December 25, 2012, 04:16:32 PM
I actually like Gregory, he's not a too over the top liberal. Maybe he loaned it to some other media folks, and the investigation can be broadened to multiple trafficking and possession violations.  :lol
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: zxcvbob on December 25, 2012, 04:26:50 PM
It might be more fun if they prosecuted the network itself rather than DG.  Not sure how you hold a corporation criminally liable.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Lee on December 25, 2012, 04:31:52 PM
Why does GE hate children?
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Scout26 on December 25, 2012, 05:12:21 PM
I'd like to see him charged and brought to trial.


Then the jury nullify the law.


I know.  Wishful thinking on my part.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: HankB on December 25, 2012, 05:51:32 PM
IANAL, but if they don't file charges against him for what's a pretty blatant violation of local law, wouldn't that put future prosecutions in doubt on the basis of "selective enforcement" or something of the sort?
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: zxcvbob on December 25, 2012, 06:07:41 PM
IANAL, but if they don't file charges against him for what's a pretty blatant violation of local law, wouldn't that put future prosecutions in doubt on the basis of "selective enforcement" or something of the sort?

I was thinking that too.  OTOH, not everybody who gets pulled over for speeding or a burned-out taillight gets a ticket (or so I've been told.  I always get the ticket)
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Bob F. on December 25, 2012, 07:40:51 PM
Yrs ago WV Senator Jay "Carpetbagger" Rockafeller was presented w/ a "full-auto" M-16 in DC. SHTF. At first he "didn't know" it was illegal; then, his chief of security had it at Jay's mountain hideout in Pocahontas Co. WV. ;/
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: SteveS on December 25, 2012, 07:50:53 PM
IANAL, but if they don't file charges against him for what's a pretty blatant violation of local law, wouldn't that put future prosecutions in doubt on the basis of "selective enforcement" or something of the sort?

Happens all the time in my neck of the woods, though prosecutors here are elected and this would come up in an election. That being said, I think they would look at the circumstances surrounding the whole thing.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Harold Tuttle on December 25, 2012, 09:07:26 PM
Originally Posted By OODA_Loop:
update:

E-mail response:

"From: "DC Police (imailagent)" <customerservice.mpd2@dc.gov>
Subject: Email from DC Police (Intranet Quorum IMA00519327)
Date: December 24, 2012 4:13:12 PM EST
To: (OODA_Loop)


The Metropolitan Police Department is in receipt of your e-mail regarding David Gregory segment on "Meet the Press." MPD has received numerous e-mails informing us of the segment. NBC contacted MPD inquiring if they could utilize a high capacity magazine for their segment. NBC was informed that possession of a high capacity magazines is not permissible and their request was denied. This matter is currently being investigated. Thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to our attention.

Customer Service - Metropolitan Police Department"
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Pharmacology on December 25, 2012, 09:33:18 PM
Originally Posted By OODA_Loop:
update:
E-mail response:
"From: "DC Police (imailagent)" <customerservice.mpd2@dc.gov>
Subject: Email from DC Police (Intranet Quorum IMA00519327)
Date: December 24, 2012 4:13:12 PM EST
To: (OODA_Loop)
The Metropolitan Police Department is in receipt of your e-mail regarding David Gregory segment on "Meet the Press." MPD has received numerous e-mails informing us of the segment. NBC contacted MPD inquiring if they could utilize a high capacity magazine for their segment. NBC was informed that possession of a high capacity magazines is not permissible and their request was denied. This matter is currently being investigated. Thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to our attention.

Customer Service - Metropolitan Police Department"


lol... this was the work of /k/.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: seeker_two on December 25, 2012, 09:34:17 PM
So....are there any eyewitnesses?....
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Regolith on December 25, 2012, 10:08:08 PM
So....are there any eyewitnesses?....


Oh, probably a couple million or so...
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Pharmacology on December 25, 2012, 10:16:03 PM
So....are there any eyewitnesses?....


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsrjBSGelGM
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Jamisjockey on December 25, 2012, 11:59:53 PM
Originally Posted By OODA_Loop:
update:

E-mail response:

"From: "DC Police (imailagent)" <customerservice.mpd2@dc.gov>
Subject: Email from DC Police (Intranet Quorum IMA00519327)
Date: December 24, 2012 4:13:12 PM EST
To: (OODA_Loop)


The Metropolitan Police Department is in receipt of your e-mail regarding David Gregory segment on "Meet the Press." MPD has received numerous e-mails informing us of the segment. NBC contacted MPD inquiring if they could utilize a high capacity magazine for their segment. NBC was informed that possession of a high capacity magazines is not permissible and their request was denied. This matter is currently being investigated. Thank you for taking the time to bring this matter to our attention.

Customer Service - Metropolitan Police Department"

Wait, wat? They were told no but did it anyway?
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: AJ Dual on December 26, 2012, 12:21:00 AM
Wait, wat? They were told no but did it anyway?

That... ups the ante a bit.  :angel:

The silver lining is various forms of Leftism eating their own here. Big city government and authoritarian police dept. vs. some MSM do-gooders.  =)
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Monkeyleg on December 26, 2012, 12:37:43 AM
Gee, if NBC ever slammed the DC police department, this will really be fun to watch.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Viking on December 26, 2012, 06:39:58 AM
[popcorn]
Need to follow this. =D
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: kgbsquirrel on December 26, 2012, 06:47:52 AM
The Schadenfreude is strong...  [popcorn]
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Lee on December 26, 2012, 09:16:40 AM
Maybe we could all be secret Santa's and donate a 30 rounder to every newz station that is in a "restricted zone".
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Jamisjockey on December 26, 2012, 09:27:30 AM
That... ups the ante a bit.  :angel:

The silver lining is various forms of Leftism eating their own here. Big city government and authoritarian police dept. vs. some MSM do-gooders.  =)

And if any of us were the chief of that department......bad gun laws aside.....would you accept being poked in the eye like that by the nooz? 

Sweet baby xenu on a flaming pogo stick I hope they no-knock his house.  The irony would be delicious.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on December 26, 2012, 09:49:45 AM
the chief is a she.  a very pc she. affirmative action chief
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Fly320s on December 26, 2012, 11:42:42 AM
What is the penalty if convicted? I suppose a felony rap is too much to hope for.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on December 26, 2012, 11:46:23 AM
You know he won't be convicted.

The excuse will be provided by DC police, something like "well, we couldn't tell from the video if it is a 30rd mag or a 10rd mag.  He may have just put a 10rd mag on screen and said it was a 30rd one.  So we won't prosecute it."

Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Monkeyleg on December 26, 2012, 11:59:11 AM
If the cops can't tell the difference between a 10 and 30 round magazine by looking at it, they shouldn't be enforcing any laws that require vision to determine infractions.
Title: Re: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: G_P on December 26, 2012, 12:29:00 PM
They will most likely sweep it under the rug by claiming it was a prop and not real.

Sent from my C5120 using Tapatalk 2
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: slingshot on December 26, 2012, 01:18:43 PM
I hope they prosecute him so that just maybe he might make a comment about the absurdity of this law in DC as well as many other laws.  If the DC police informed him it was illegal to poessess the magazine, then his choice was a blantant infraction of the law.  He was warned and he had motive.  I have heard that people are prosecuted for just a cop finding a loaded round lying inside there car.  Stupid stuff.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: T.O.M. on December 26, 2012, 01:37:56 PM
You know he won't be convicted.

The excuse will be provided by DC police, something like "well, we couldn't tell from the video if it is a 30rd mag or a 10rd mag.  He may have just put a 10rd mag on screen and said it was a 30rd one.  So we won't prosecute it."





I bet this is the answer, after some phone calls  we'll never know about.  Remember that DC prosecutors are all feds, so the final decision falls to AG Holder...
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Jocassee on December 26, 2012, 03:23:51 PM
My vote is we go Alinsky on his ass.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: kgbsquirrel on December 26, 2012, 03:45:44 PM
What is the penalty if convicted? I suppose a felony rap is too much to hope for.

Up to one year and up to $1000.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: wmenorr67 on December 26, 2012, 04:27:26 PM
Does anyone have the actual code and/or law in question and how it is exactly worded?

The articles I have read state the rule is high capacity is forbidden, define high capacity.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on December 26, 2012, 04:35:14 PM
http://weblinks.westlaw.com/result/default.aspx?cite=UUID%28N57E577C030-1B11DEA7CD8-1F2617D4421%29&db=1000869&findtype=VQ&fn=_top&pbc=DA010192&rlt=CLID_FQRLT524872534152612&rp=%2FSearch%2Fdefault.wl&rs=WEBL12.10&service=Find&spa=DCC-1000&sr=TC&vr=2.0

DC Code 7-2506.01(b).

Quote
(b) No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. For the purposes of this subsection, the term “large capacity ammunition feeding device” means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The term “large capacity ammunition feeding device” shall not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Doggy Daddy on December 26, 2012, 08:50:35 PM
Up to one year and up to $1000.

He should be okay with doing a year...

                                               ...after all, it'll be in a gun-free zone.   :lol:
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: kgbsquirrel on December 26, 2012, 09:09:57 PM
He should be okay with doing a year...

                                               ...after all, it'll be in a gun-free zone.   :lol:

Not necessarily.

http://www.correctionsone.com/contraband/articles/1961780-15-deadly-improvised-prison-weapons-and-tools/

Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on December 26, 2012, 09:10:56 PM
he wouldn't last the weekend in northwest 1
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: slingshot on December 26, 2012, 10:53:11 PM
Here is a revised article.  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/26/david-gregory-police-investigation_n_2364637.html

It appears to me that the responsibilty weaseling is already at work.  Claims they had permission from the ATF (Federal), but not District of Columbia/DC.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Monkeyleg on December 26, 2012, 10:57:47 PM
ATF permission trumps state or district law? So, if a state bans possession of full-auto's, but the ATF says it's okay, then ATF overrides the state? C',mon, chief. Arrest the guy.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Frank Castle on December 27, 2012, 11:52:30 AM
hypocrites

 Swanky Private School Obama’s Daughters & David Gregory’s Children Attend Has 11 Armed Guards

http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/2012/12/26/figures-swanky-private-school-obamas-daughters-david-gregorys-children-attend-has-11-armed-guards/ (http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_html/frugal-blog/frugal-cafe-blogzone/2012/12/26/figures-swanky-private-school-obamas-daughters-david-gregorys-children-attend-has-11-armed-guards/)
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on December 27, 2012, 12:00:09 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2253571/President-Obama-reveals-keeps-going-First-Lady--20-years-marriage.html

Quote
President Barack Obama revealed the 'real reason' he wanted a second term as president is because his daughter Malia, age 14, is about to start dating boys.

'One of the main incentives of running was continued Secret Service protection so we can have men with guns around at all times,' the father of two joked.


While we may joke about cleaning shotguns when a daughter's boyfriend comes to pick her up, we do it from an understanding that we aren't actually going to shoot the guy (unless he crosses a particular line). 

I'm touchier about this with this POTUS because he's a gun-grabber.  I don't like him borrowing any element of "gun culture," even this one.  He's a jerk and I don't like him, and he can't have our jokes.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Doggy Daddy on December 27, 2012, 12:31:37 PM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2253571/President-Obama-reveals-keeps-going-First-Lady--20-years-marriage.html

While we may joke about cleaning shotguns when a daughter's boyfriend comes to pick her up, we do it from an understanding that we aren't actually going to shoot the guy (unless he crosses a particular line). 

I'm touchier about this with this POTUS because he's a gun-grabber.  I don't like him borrowing any element of "gun culture," even this one.  He's a jerk and I don't like him, and he can't have our jokes.

Oh yeah, that's FB'ed.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Viking on December 27, 2012, 12:41:01 PM
I'm wondering if he's actually joking.
Title: Re: Wow...NBC's David Gregory
Post by: Doggy Daddy on December 27, 2012, 12:43:08 PM
I'm wondering if he's actually joking.

Don't care one way or the other.  If he's joking, it's about a factual situation.  A situation that is NOT a joke to many, many others.

It helps shine the light on his callous nature.