Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: Ben on January 19, 2013, 09:51:53 PM

Title: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Ben on January 19, 2013, 09:51:53 PM
This is a good one. "Led projectile gun".

http://www.kcoy.com/Global/story.asp?S=20627618

Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 19, 2013, 09:57:33 PM
Quote
The reason being is when an animal is shot and its not retrieved a condor could get to it, eat it, and get lead poisoning.

No, that's not from the comments. A real-deal professional news site actually put that sentence in an article.  [barf]
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Regolith on January 19, 2013, 10:01:17 PM
That article reads like it was written by a 12 year old.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Ben on January 19, 2013, 10:04:19 PM
No, that's not from the comments. A real-deal professional news site actually put that sentence in an article.  [barf]

There is actually a lead ban for that entire region of CA (one of the reasons I put this in politics) because of the California Condor. However it also irked me that they created a new dangerous weapon type called the "Led (sic) projectile gun", which they refer to as an "illegal gun", once again creating more false information on firearms.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: lee n. field on January 19, 2013, 10:13:42 PM
yes, it does read like someone in grade school or junior high wrote it.

Quote
The gun used was a led projectile gun which is illegal as there is a lead ban in the area. The reason being is when an animal is shot and its not retrieved a condor could get to it, eat it, and get lead poisoning.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: BlueStarLizzard on January 19, 2013, 10:24:17 PM
L e d... Does it make pretty lights?

Seriously, forget message boards, with my bad spelling, grammer fails and failure to do research before I post, I should just become a journalist.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: RoadKingLarry on January 19, 2013, 10:56:41 PM
L e d... Does it make pretty lights?

Seriously, forget message boards, with my bad spelling, grammer fails and failure to do research before I post, I should just become a journalist.

You do know you will have to be lobotomized before you can assume that title don't you?
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: BlueStarLizzard on January 19, 2013, 10:59:44 PM
You do know you will have to be lobotomized before you can assume that title don't you?

I could still do a better job then half these hacks.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Monkeyleg on January 19, 2013, 11:02:02 PM
I've been seeing a lot of misspelling, poor grammar and other very basic mistakes in newspaper stories from all over. Makes me wonder if the newspapers can't afford spell check anymore.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Ben on January 19, 2013, 11:13:01 PM
Makes me wonder if the newspapers can't afford spell check anymore.

Well, "led" is spelled correctly. What they need are freakin' proofreaders with an IQ not in the double digits. Don't even get me started on fact checkers.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Hawkmoon on January 19, 2013, 11:48:00 PM
There is actually a lead ban for that entire region of CA (one of the reasons I put this in politics) because of the California Condor. However it also irked me that they created a new dangerous weapon type called the "Led (sic) projectile gun", which they refer to as an "illegal gun", once again creating more false information on firearms.

Does this Led projectile gun bring down zeppelins?
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Hawkmoon on January 19, 2013, 11:53:37 PM
I've been seeing a lot of misspelling, poor grammar and other very basic mistakes in newspaper stories from all over. Makes me wonder if the newspapers can't afford spell check anymore.

Stop wondering. Now, they can't. Stories are now uploaded essentially the way they are received, and "edited" only for length where necessary to make space for the one paid ad they were able to sell this week.

What I love are the "articles" that appear on the web sites of local television stations -- the "articles" that are nothing more than (poor) transcriptions of the illiterate ramblings of the roving, on-the-scene reporters and their red-hot interviewees. The roving reporters can't speak proper English, and God forbid anyone should, like, correct it before putting it up on the web.

And we wonder why Johnny can't read.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 20, 2013, 12:07:39 AM
Aww, that's so cute. They're trying to understand.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2098375438001/what-makes-a-gun-an-assault-rifle/?intcmp=obnetwork
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Monkeyleg on January 20, 2013, 12:31:27 AM
I sometimes think that reporting has been outsourced to India, along with telemarketing.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 20, 2013, 01:07:36 AM
I sometimes think that reporting has been outsourced to India, along with telemarketing.


No, journalism has been outsourced to Europe. Along with the government. Why else would they be building "high-speed" rail from Lake Michigan to the Missouri?
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: AJ Dual on January 20, 2013, 01:17:53 AM
I've been seeing a lot of misspelling, poor grammar and other very basic mistakes in newspaper stories from all over. Makes me wonder if the newspapers can't afford spell check anymore.

All the hallmarks of a dying industry. As circulation drops, and Craigslist gutted their want-ad profits, the newspapers have had to offer buy-outs to the older staff that actually... you know, had journalistic skills.

And I think there's a downward selection pressure working on the newspapers too. The writing's been on the wall over their fate for the better part of a decade now. So that means there's now been 1 or even 2 cohorts of college graduates who, knowing what was happening, went for a career in print journalism anyway.  :facepalm:

So I think there's some truth to the idea that anyone smart enough to be a good journalist is by definition also smart enough to not be a (print) journalist these days.

Other symptoms of this are the incidents of printing CCW or gun-license maps or databases, behind the equally dubious and thin veil of "the public's right to know" is the desperation that "We need to sell papers!"

BTW Monkeyleg, were  you aware that the Eugene Kane of the Journal Sentinel got demoted to working the city beat, then later in October took a buyout? I guess times are tough and they can't afford a full time race baiter anymore.  :laugh:

Just yesterday I was accosted at Pick 'N Save by the sales-drones working the Journal Sentinel kiosk they set up in the supermarket every few weeks, trying to hand out free papers. (Which I'm sure counts towards their circulation numbers... I bet they try to count the bottom of every parakeet cage in the Milwaukee metro too.)  I declined the paper, and told them I thought institutions in decline should have the dignity to give up at some point. They went  ??? then  :O...
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Angel Eyes on January 20, 2013, 02:08:51 AM
Does this Led projectile gun bring down zeppelins?

The whole article left me dazed and confused ...
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Monkeyleg on January 20, 2013, 02:57:46 AM
Quote
BTW Monkeyleg, were  you aware that the Eugene Kane of the Journal Sentinel got demoted to working the city beat, then later in October took a buyout? I guess times are tough and they can't afford a full time race baiter anymore.

No. That's great. Too bad he got a buyout. I would rather he flipped burgers for the rest of his life.

I'm seeing the same thing with the liberal rag down here that I saw with the Journal Sentinel: cancel your subscription, and they keep giving you the paper for free to keep their circulation numbers up for advertising. I'm really tempted to call the newspaper audit company and have them do one on the rag down here.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 20, 2013, 01:44:03 PM
No. That's great. Too bad he got a buyout. I would rather he flipped burgers for the rest of his life.

Racist!
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Doggy Daddy on January 20, 2013, 02:10:05 PM
Aww, that's so cute. They're trying to understand.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2098375438001/what-makes-a-gun-an-assault-rifle/?intcmp=obnetwork (http://video.foxnews.com/v/2098375438001/what-makes-a-gun-an-assault-rifle/?intcmp=obnetwork)

I've got to stand up for FOX a little bit.  Over a week ago, I sent an email to newsmanager@foxnews.com complaining about some of their coverage being uninformed, biased, and just plain sloppy.  Since then, I've naturally paid even more attention to their reporting.  I do most of my FOX viewing from 2:30 am to 4:00 am, then a bit more in the 4:00 pm to 6:00 pm range.  Generally, I've been fairly pleased.  I really do think that (with a few exceptions {coughrileycough}) they've actually been trying to learn and to give a proper presentation of what the gun grab is all about.  I.E., it ain't about hunting.   Hence, their link above.  Again, they're not perfect.  But I really do believe most of them are trying.
Title: Re: Media Screwup on Guns #975,347,210
Post by: Lee on January 21, 2013, 08:45:37 PM
So...was it the 4 legged variety, or from south of the border?