Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: AZRedhawk44 on March 05, 2013, 03:48:34 PM

Title: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on March 05, 2013, 03:48:34 PM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/03/05/fbi-investigating-report-of-possible-drone-spotted-near-jfk/

Here we go.

Banning or licensing of radio/model/drone aircraft pilots.

It's for the children, on the planes!
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: Ben on March 05, 2013, 03:53:04 PM
While I like a conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, you understand that according to the story this was spotted in Class B airspace? If I were flying there I would be concerned too.
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: Fitz on March 05, 2013, 03:54:40 PM
Never mind...
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: Boomhauer on March 05, 2013, 04:21:07 PM
You need to learn how the airspace system works. You know especially what with you wanting to be a pilot.
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on March 05, 2013, 04:46:49 PM
on a related note these guys say "BUY"

http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/aa
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: dm1333 on March 05, 2013, 06:28:23 PM
Quote
“The FBI is asking anyone with information about the unmanned aircraft or the operator to contact us,” Special Agent in Charge John Giacalone said in a statement. “Our paramount concern is the safety of aircraft passengers and crew.”

The Federal Aviation Administration is also investigating

It would really suck to have a mid air collision with a drone or RC plane that didn't belong in that airspace.

Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: Fitz on March 05, 2013, 06:30:49 PM
It would really suck to have a mid air collision with a drone or RC plane that didn't belong in that airspace.

Statist!
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: kgbsquirrel on March 05, 2013, 06:40:07 PM
This seems less "nobody but us should have UAV's!" than it is "don't go pushing shopping carts loaded with bricks out into the interstate during rush-hour."

RC aircraft is fine. Flying one into the engine intake of an airliner trying to land with 300 people on board, not so much. Personal liberty, harm to others, blah blah blah.
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: seeker_two on March 05, 2013, 11:17:14 PM
This seems less "nobody but us should have UAV's!" than it is "don't go pushing shopping carts loaded with bricks out into the interstate during rush-hour."

I suppose you have to get a special gov't license to do that too, right?....
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: BobR on March 07, 2013, 08:17:47 PM
I *know* I saw a RC plane pass right off of our starboard wing once as we were about 4 miles from the end of the runway at Moffett Field going in to land. Just a quick flash out of the corner of my eye. The pilots were busy with the approach and I was sitting in the center seat doing my usual scanning of the airspace, between power changes and checklists, looking for bug smashers (little airplanes) and balloons when it zipped by. To say the least, it would have sucked to have it hit us, especially if we took it in a prop or down an intake.

bob
Title: Re: Drones for me, not for thee
Post by: Jamisjockey on March 09, 2013, 02:01:39 PM
It would really suck to have a mid air collision with a drone or RC plane that didn't belong in that airspace.



This
Right
here