Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Ben on February 17, 2015, 10:15:09 AM

Title: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Ben on February 17, 2015, 10:15:09 AM
I feel bad that this woman died, and won't go into detail listing mistakes, but will just say she might have wanted to make better choices from the git-go (like not going, given the weather).

What was interesting, was that even with her beacon active, they appeared to be getting +-1 mile coordinates. With good weather and open terrain, that might not be too problematic for searchers, especially with airborne resources, but in bad weather and closed terrain, that's bad. I'm very curious to know what model PEPIRB she had and what the terrain and vegetation were like where she activated it.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/02/17/hiker-who-got-lost-in-deteriorating-weather-conditions-found-dead-in-nh/
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: RevDisk on February 17, 2015, 10:37:35 AM
(https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash2/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/540192_10151020533774387_389553607_n.jpg?oh=bb7a75a59bada5a48634854310c5d4f8&oe=558B00DF)

This was in August. It was still cold, wet and foggy. It reminded me of LV-426.

It's relatively easy to die in the White Mountains. People have frozen to death every month of the year except July or August. Visibility can drop from miles to single feet in a short period of time. I don't have an EIRB but I do plan on buying one. In the mean time, I do have an ACR MS-2000 and I highly recommend it. Even if you DO get an EIRB, owning a strobe is very handy. A lot of helicopter mounted FLIR units can specifically detect said strobes.

Earlier weather:

(https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xaf1/t31.0-8/209579_10151018138884387_1426708564_o.jpg)


Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: 230RN on February 17, 2015, 11:39:23 AM
I have a vague notion as to how blowing snow and other crap can foul up GPS stuff, but I wonder if anyone had better notions.

For example, even snow or rain on the line of pine trees outside can screw up my over-the-air digital TV reception.

Help, please, on the GPS "problem?"
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: KD5NRH on February 17, 2015, 12:12:47 PM
Even if you DO get an EIRB, owning a strobe is very handy. A lot of helicopter mounted FLIR units can specifically detect said strobes.

EPIRB, strobe, at least 3 red aerial flares and a couple of handheld ones.  I'd also want a good signal mirror and at least a basic shelter kit.  Signalling in an area like that would be too important to short yourself of tried-and-true methods, and frankly, it sounds like she was just flat out unprepared for the possibility of having to hunker down and wait a bit.  30 below is pretty extreme, but a sheltered spot and a small fire will get you through a couple days.  Good emergency gear for that would still fit in a regular day pack, though I'd probably add a dry-bagged sleeping bag to my regular hiking emergency gear if that sort of weather was a possibility.  The extra bulk would be well worth it in case of a leg injury or anything else that precludes getting back to the car right away.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: RevDisk on February 17, 2015, 12:59:15 PM
EPIRB, strobe, at least 3 red aerial flares and a couple of handheld ones.  I'd also want a good signal mirror and at least a basic shelter kit.  Signalling in an area like that would be too important to short yourself of tried-and-true methods, and frankly, it sounds like she was just flat out unprepared for the possibility of having to hunker down and wait a bit.  30 below is pretty extreme, but a sheltered spot and a small fire will get you through a couple days.  Good emergency gear for that would still fit in a regular day pack, though I'd probably add a dry-bagged sleeping bag to my regular hiking emergency gear if that sort of weather was a possibility.  The extra bulk would be well worth it in case of a leg injury or anything else that precludes getting back to the car right away.

On the White Mountains, aerial flares would be either a cruel joke or counterproductive. 100 mph winds would very quickly take it somewhere else in a hurry. Handheld flares would probably be more handy for quick firestarter, but it's not impossible for them to be handy. Under the specific circumstances of article, most useful aspect of a military strobe light would be to allow search team to more easily find one's corpse. Mt Washington and the surrounding mountains can have hurricane force winds roughly one day in three. Sending a helicopter into that is a quick way to turn one casualty into several. Helping rescue services more easily find your corpse might actually save lives. Orange streamer would be a good idea as well.

The lady apparently was well equipped. Just not enough for the area and weather she ended up going through. Snow hurricanes are nasty gorram things. It'll shred most consumer tents, and not a lot of hiker sleeping bags can deal with -30 temps. Large parts of the mountains are alpine, and don't have trees. Mostly moss, which doesn't burn well.

Best not to think of the White Mountains as yanno, nature. During the Winter months, think of it as an angrier version of the North Pole. With more interesting terrain. Oh, and lovely enough fact, during the winter, it is not terribly uncommon for the White Mountains to be colder than the North Pole.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Jamisjockey on February 17, 2015, 01:53:55 PM
The EPIRB I have for my boat weighs like 4 pounds and is large and bulky.  There are plenty of PLB's that are much smaller and just as accurate. 
I've fired aerial flares before, and I don't expect that in 100mph winds you're going to see much effectiveness from them.  During daytime, the smoke trail is the best visual indicator from the flare.  I can't imagine in whiteout snowstorm conditions them being worth a *expletive deleted*it. 
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 17, 2015, 01:58:50 PM
EPIRB, strobe, at least 3 red aerial flares and a couple of handheld ones.  I'd also want a good signal mirror and at least a basic shelter kit.  Signalling in an area like that would be too important to short yourself of tried-and-true methods, and frankly, it sounds like she was just flat out unprepared for the possibility of having to hunker down and wait a bit.  30 below is pretty extreme, but a sheltered spot and a small fire will get you through a couple days.  Good emergency gear for that would still fit in a regular day pack, though I'd probably add a dry-bagged sleeping bag to my regular hiking emergency gear if that sort of weather was a possibility.  The extra bulk would be well worth it in case of a leg injury or anything else that precludes getting back to the car right away.

You've actually never been in a real blizzard have you?
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: griz on February 17, 2015, 02:37:51 PM
GPS systems are designed to work even in heavy cloud cover.  I've used them in downpours and they are still good to within 50 feet easily.  But I've never used one in a real blizzard, so don't know if that would have an effect.  It's also possible she sought shelter in an area protected by rock walls, and the signal bounce can be bad.  Either way it sounds like rescue would have been impossible in that weather even if they knew within one foot where she was.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: vaskidmark on February 17, 2015, 02:49:15 PM
Green laser flare http://www.equipped.com/rescuelaser.htm

Put that sucker up into the clouds and it can look like the Martians are going to land.

Yes, they are expensive and can be finicky about batteries.  But if you are going off the highway into where Mother Nature makes the rules you do want to have as much going for you as possible.

According to the survival stuff I have read/watched a mylar sheet and a whole lot of forest floor litter can make you a shelter that works like a snow cave.  And I have experienced snow caves - they get quite warm when done right and not built on/out of wet snow/slush.

But caveat emptor - even with all the right stuff used the right way there is no guarantee you will survive.

stay safe.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 17, 2015, 02:52:57 PM
GPS systems are designed to work even in heavy cloud cover.  I've used them in downpours and they are still good to within 50 feet easily.  But I've never used one in a real blizzard, so don't know if that would have an effect.  It's also possible she sought shelter in an area protected by rock walls, and the signal bounce can be bad.  Either way it sounds like rescue would have been impossible in that weather even if they knew within one foot where she was.

Poor satellite geometry can give you some very skewed results.

I use a mapping grade Trimble GIS unit and I can get some screwy results with poor satellite and doing point collection on the fly.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: KD5NRH on February 17, 2015, 02:53:39 PM
You've actually never been in a real blizzard have you?

Not outdoors, but then I've never been naked except for a Dolly Parton wig and a thin coat of honey and tied up in fistful's bedroom either, largely because I'm not stupid enough to put myself in either situation.  

If, for some reason, I did decide to go for a hike in blizzard country in blizzard season, I'd opt for a route with a lot more natural shelter spots instead of finding the most barren, exposed chunk of rock available.

But caveat emptor - even with all the right stuff used the right way there is no guarantee you will survive.

That applies to walking down the street or taking a nap in your own bed, too.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on February 17, 2015, 03:17:39 PM
Been outside in a blizzard. Just to move from building to car. It was impressive. I was holding a 6 week old infant. The ZOMG factor for me was high


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Ben on February 17, 2015, 03:22:31 PM
One of the reasons I'm curious as to what exactly her "locator beacon" was is that if the official wasn't either misquoted or mispoke, +-1 mile is pretty wonky. That's ~3400 yards. Over the last 20 years, I've used Pluggers, Trimble XRs, and a slew of consumer units and have never seen more than a couple of hundred yard errors, and that was consumer units in the pre-WAAS, Selective Availability days.

Normally, before a correctly configured unit shows something ridiculous like being a mile off, it wouldn't have even locked on to any sats in the first place. I don't believe any current consumer units will even give you a position with less than three sats. Being a mile off outside of the polar regions is a curiosity. Though I'm not an expert on the workings of EPIRBS - there might have been something causing an error in the coms with the SARSAT satellites.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: MechAg94 on February 17, 2015, 03:34:18 PM
Is there some sort of Winter Mountain Hiking group I don't know about?  Hiking in the mountains in New Hampshire in Winter doesn't seem like a great idea even with all the right gear. 
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: RevDisk on February 17, 2015, 04:06:01 PM
One of the reasons I'm curious as to what exactly her "locator beacon" was is that if the official wasn't either misquoted or mispoke, +-1 mile is pretty wonky. That's ~3400 yards. Over the last 20 years, I've used Pluggers, Trimble XRs, and a slew of consumer units and have never seen more than a couple of hundred yard errors, and that was consumer units in the pre-WAAS, Selective Availability days.

Normally, before a correctly configured unit shows something ridiculous like being a mile off, it wouldn't have even locked on to any sats in the first place. I don't believe any current consumer units will even give you a position with less than three sats. Being a mile off outside of the polar regions is a curiosity. Though I'm not an expert on the workings of EPIRBS - there might have been something causing an error in the coms with the SARSAT satellites.

Some error receiving from GPS satellites, or transmitting to SARSAT.  I concur that 1 mile is weird, but not entirely out of the realm of possibility. Other possibility is that the beacon lost its fix and couldn't get a new one.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Ben on February 17, 2015, 04:19:22 PM
Some error receiving from GPS satellites, or transmitting to SARSAT.  I concur that 1 mile is weird, but not entirely out of the realm of possibility. Other possibility is that the beacon lost its fix and couldn't get a new one.

I guess another obvious possibility might be that she ignored what you should normally do in this situation, and instead of staying put, started walking and assumed her beacon would update her position. Don't know why she might decide to walk in those conditions, unless she was already well into hypothermia and not thinking clearly.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: KD5NRH on February 17, 2015, 04:32:44 PM
One of the reasons I'm curious as to what exactly her "locator beacon" was is that if the official wasn't either misquoted or mispoke, +-1 mile is pretty wonky.

Well, he did say a mile circumference, which is an odd way of defining a search area, but would mean a ~280 yard radius.

Do most EPIRBs have some sort of indicator that would let the user know the fix sucks?  Seems like it would be a good feature, since one could then put the beacon somewhere with a good signal within line of sight or other means of letting searchers know where to go from there, while retreating to a nearby shelter.  One would hope that searchers wouldn't just say "Oh, it's an abandoned EPIRB that somebody left laying out on this rock.  Let's go home." but it would still speed things along to have some sort of arrow, cord or note attached to lead them right into the snow cave, small crevice or whatever else you're hiding from the weather in.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: bedlamite on February 17, 2015, 05:04:54 PM
Well, he did say a mile circumference, which is an odd way of defining a search area, but would mean a ~280 yard radius.


Unfortunately, you can't assume that anyone knows the difference between circumference and radius anymore.  =(

Hiking in the mountains in New Hampshire in Winter doesn't seem like a great idea even with all the right gear. 

^Yeah, pretty much this.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Boomhauer on February 17, 2015, 05:24:20 PM
Holy hell talk about a nightmarish survival and SAR scenario.


Quote
Well, he did say a mile circumference, which is an odd way of defining a search area, but would mean a ~280 yard radius.

He probably said radius. I chalk up errors like that to the idiot reporters who pull *expletive deleted*it out of their asses when writing stories.


Those kinds of conditions, you are pretty much *expletive deleted*ed if you wind up in them, because help ain't gonna find you in time to make a difference.

Quote
Good emergency gear for that would still fit in a regular day pack

Not for this it wouldn't.




Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Fitz on February 17, 2015, 05:45:23 PM
Having a bit of extreme cold weather survival training, I can say pretty confidently that one does not pack what one needs to survive such a scenario in a simple day pack. Especially if you have any ambitions of getting out of it.

The best bit of kit for a situation like this is your head. Knowing how to navigate with the old fasioned methods routinely saves lives. It is possible to terrain associate in gnarly weather (especially if you keep good track of your position before the weather gets gnarly) , and dead reckoning works even in no visibility, if you're careful.

Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Scout26 on February 17, 2015, 07:18:18 PM
Walking around in a blizzard in the mountains is a sure way to die quick.

Shelter is the most important asset.  Find a place to hunker down and ride out the storm.  Fire if you can build one, but in 40+ mph winds that going to be real tricky.

Hypothermia makes people do crazy and stupid things.  It's almost as it the brain sees that the body is dying and attempts to speed up the process in it's bad decision making.

And yeah, a simple daypack full of "stuff" ain't enough to try to survive that especially when temps and windchills drop well into the negatives.  And the only way a flare would work in white-out conditions was it you launched it at your rescuers and hit them with it.

http://news.yahoo.com/video/jim-cantore-still-freaking-thundersnow-215635138-cbs.html

Check out the background.  Now picture being out in the woods/mountains where there are no street lights, and you pretty much can't see your hand in front of your face.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 17, 2015, 07:24:57 PM
To add to what Scout said: This is what a blizzard looks like from a person's perspective.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmentalfloss.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Farticle_640x430%2Fpublic%2Fblizzard_5.jpg&hash=485141859c00868bd4163ef2f8f966276093540c)
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on February 17, 2015, 07:26:50 PM
Pictures don't do it justice . It was a real interesting thing for me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 17, 2015, 07:43:33 PM
Pictures don't do it justice . It was a real interesting thing for me.

You ain't kidding there.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Hawkmoon on February 17, 2015, 07:47:20 PM
Is there some sort of Winter Mountain Hiking group I don't know about?  Hiking in the mountains in New Hampshire in Winter doesn't seem like a great idea even with all the right gear. 

Especially solo.

And, if I read the article correctly, she intended to top THREE mountains in one trek. That's not a one-day stroll in the park. She should have had a good tent and a good alpine sleeping bag, not just a day pack with a few energy bars in it.

I have satellite TV (DirecTV), and I've lost signal during heavy snow storms. If she was in real blizzards conditions, it's probably a miracle that she got any signal out at all. The problem is (I think), the unit needs three satellites to triangulate location, but that information tells her EPIRB where she is, and then transmits that location to the hoped-for rescuers. If her unit isn't receiving a clean signal, it can't calculate where it is, so the coordinates of the "Please save my ass" upload message are worthless.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Hawkmoon on February 17, 2015, 07:50:49 PM
... and dead reckoning works even in no visibility, if you're careful.

And if you have a map, and a compass.

"I don't need a silly old compass -- I have a GPS!"
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on February 17, 2015, 08:26:45 PM
You ain't kidding there.
I kept saying holy "stuff" like a mantra. And I had about a mile no more than 2 to get to where we were staying. In an explorer and the blizzard had just started. It was as scary as anything i have done. Just the walk  from the airport terminal to the car was a challenge. As Fitz observed I think your brain is your most important survival asset. I knew I had zero margin for screwing up.
Glad I got to experience it. Once. Had it to do over I would not have had a baby with me.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: KD5NRH on February 17, 2015, 08:55:53 PM
To add to what Scout said: This is what a blizzard looks like from a person's perspective.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmentalfloss.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Farticle_640x430%2Fpublic%2Fblizzard_5.jpg&hash=485141859c00868bd4163ef2f8f966276093540c)

Here's what it looks like from a smart person's perspective:
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fphotorator.com%2Fphotos%2Fimages%2Fsnow-drift-covers-entire-back-door-in-connecticut-lots-more-beautiful-photos-and-videos-from-the-northeast-blizzard-of-inside--14403.jpg&hash=ad413092720d246f0509d862f611b0e6b3092677)
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 17, 2015, 09:20:26 PM
You do know most blizzards are not from falling snow, but wind blowing snow around that has already landed.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3jzoeRCMAAxRxc.jpg)

this is our weather indicator
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Scout26 on February 17, 2015, 09:24:34 PM
Needs eggs.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: lupinus on February 17, 2015, 09:47:24 PM
Needs eggs.
And bacon
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: RoadKingLarry on February 17, 2015, 09:58:12 PM
To add to what Scout said: This is what a blizzard looks like from a person's perspective.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmentalfloss.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Farticle_640x430%2Fpublic%2Fblizzard_5.jpg&hash=485141859c00868bd4163ef2f8f966276093540c)

Those are particularly fun when you're driving. It gets real fun driving my company van when the snow is blowing across in front of you, all you can see is the snow and no point of reference to tell you where you are. Vertigo for the win.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: vaskidmark on February 17, 2015, 09:59:57 PM
And bacon

One should have enough SHTF Emergency Survival Bacon stashed to ride out even the worst that Mother Nature throws at Antarctica.

For someone who stocks ammo in anticipation of TEOTWAWKI Zombie Apocalypse Invasion of the Killer Tomatos that comes out to about three strips per round.

stay safe.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: bedlamite on February 17, 2015, 10:00:37 PM
Here's what it looks like from a smart person's perspective:
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwallpoper.com%2Fimages%2F00%2F32%2F44%2F09%2Fbeach-tropical_00324409.jpg&hash=e6a0db7fdffd2e0842f79cc2086a27d9096749d3)

FTFY.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Hawkmoon on February 17, 2015, 11:30:50 PM
You do know most blizzards are not from falling snow, but wind blowing snow around that has already landed.

I don't think that quite fits any recognized definition of "blizzard," although it is certainly a side effect during a blizzard.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 17, 2015, 11:55:05 PM
I don't think that quite fits any recognized definition of "blizzard," although it is certainly a side effect during a blizzard.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard

See ground blizzards, way more common than a snow storm blizzard in the frozen north.

Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: KD5NRH on February 18, 2015, 12:06:36 AM
Shelter is the most important asset.  Find a place to hunker down and ride out the storm.  Fire if you can build one, but in 40+ mph winds that going to be real tricky.

If your "shelter" has 40mph winds blowing through it, fire isn't going to help anyway.  OTOH, short of finding yourself on flat rock or solid ice, it's pretty hard for someone experienced in finding and/or making a shelter to not come up with something better than that using only normal survival gear.  Dig a hole, burrow into the snow, crawl under a boulder, whatever it takes to get out of that weather until it clears up enough to look for or make a better shelter.  At a rough guess, I'd say 80% of the volume of my winter 72 hour kit is shelter-related.  A lot of that is multi-purpose, but I'm comfortable with relegating other tasks to only a fifth of the space when the weather warrants.

For summer, (here) I sometimes drop some of the shelter in favor of more water and/or water procurement, because the main shelter concerns become simply shade during the day and mosquito protection at night, with some provision for a rain cover for the occasional cold rain.  (Otherwise, 80F overnight lows don't really make hypothermia an issue, and I've been in a few small summer storms here that were warm enough to make a very comfortable shower.)  When I travel, I also alter the kit for the areas I'll be travelling through.  (Usually by adding another bag, since I still want my "local" gear in case something happens in the first 150-200 miles.)  If I were planning to be in an area where being stuck out in the middle of a huge expanse of solid rock or ice sheet would be a definite possibility, that would also warrant some significant gear changes, like a cold weather bivy sack, properly rated mummy bag and some rock/ice climbing gear.

What it boils down to is knowing some basic information about the area you're going into, the expected weather, and your personal limits.  
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Firethorn on February 18, 2015, 12:48:48 AM
Even something as 'simple' as an arctic sleeping bag, a tarp/survival blanket, and a camp shovel should not only keep you alive, but fairly comfortable in a massive blizzard. 

The trick, I think, is to realize that it's getting bad, pop your beacon, then as said, find a sheltered spot and start digging. 

My training is that, if you can, you dig down a little, then back up a smidge.  Almost like a p-trap.  That way you don't have the direct wind into your shelter.

You might need to stay awake for most of it to clear your entrance occasionally.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Hawkmoon on February 18, 2015, 05:59:48 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blizzard

See ground blizzards, way more common than a snow storm blizzard in the frozen north.

I am 70 years old, I live in the frozen north, and I never heard the term "ground blizzard" before this thread. And in 70 years living in the frozen north, I have never encountered one.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on February 18, 2015, 07:30:01 AM
It's more a prairie thing. It's impressive . I reaches out in a very visceral way and says "hi I am here to kill you" if you are outdoors


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 18, 2015, 08:40:20 AM
I am 70 years old, I live in the frozen north, and I never heard the term "ground blizzard" before this thread. And in 70 years living in the frozen north, I have never encountered one.

I encountered one on Jan 4, 2015 near Spicer, MN coming home from a ice fishing trip. Cold front came in about midnight, temps dropped from high 20's F to -15F in less than 4 hours, winds picked up and the snow blew and blew and blew. It was a good thing it was a near cloud less day and plenty bright or I would have had to stay in Spicer and wait the blizzard out. I only had to drive 20 or so miles at 15-20 mph before the winds laid down enough to resume back to highway speeds.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: charby on February 18, 2015, 08:43:43 AM
It's more a prairie thing. It's impressive . I reaches out in a very visceral way and says "hi I am here to kill you" if you are outdoors


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

not always

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.thedenverchannel.com%2Fphoto%2F2012%2F10%2F06%2FSnow-Blowing-Off-The-Peaks-In-Rocky-Mountain-National-Park-28987652_223579_ver1.0_640_480.jpg&hash=8c53be0bfd4b7c4fab8c75667c842ba7f4a7e234)
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on February 18, 2015, 08:44:22 AM
Oh heck no.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Jamisjockey on February 18, 2015, 09:32:05 AM

What it boils down to is knowing some basic information about the area you're going into, the expected weather, and your personal limits.  

Yeah because the forecast is never wrong.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: KD5NRH on February 18, 2015, 09:43:08 AM
(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.thedenverchannel.com%2Fphoto%2F2012%2F10%2F06%2FSnow-Blowing-Off-The-Peaks-In-Rocky-Mountain-National-Park-28987652_223579_ver1.0_640_480.jpg&hash=8c53be0bfd4b7c4fab8c75667c842ba7f4a7e234)

That's God's way of saying "look at My pretty mountain...from a distance."

Yeah because the forecast is never wrong.

They're wrong plenty, but not often to the degree of "pleasant, sunny spring day" turning out to be "raging wrath of God storm" on a 24 hour outlook.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: bedlamite on February 18, 2015, 09:53:50 AM
Yeah because the forecast is never wrong.

The forecast doesn't need to be perfect to know it's going to be cold, windy, and snowing up on those mountains in February.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Jamisjockey on February 18, 2015, 10:02:20 AM
That's God's way of saying "look at My pretty mountain...from a distance."

They're wrong plenty, but not often to the degree of "pleasant, sunny spring day" turning out to be "raging wrath of God storm" on a 24 hour outlook.

I'm sure we've all seen fronts arrive 12+ hours ahead of forecast. 

Not everything in life is foreseeable.  That's all I'm sayin.
Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: Boomhauer on February 18, 2015, 10:40:08 AM
I'm sure we've all seen fronts arrive 12+ hours ahead of forecast. 

Not everything in life is foreseeable.  That's all I'm sayin.

This.

Title: Re: Don't Count on Your Locator Beacon
Post by: KD5NRH on February 18, 2015, 12:26:28 PM
I'm sure we've all seen fronts arrive 12+ hours ahead of forecast.

"She was alone and planned to hike the top of Mount Madison, WMUR-TV said, before heading through Mount Adams, Mount Jefferson and Mount Washington, which at about 6,300 feet is the highest peak in the Northeast."

Now, without mapping it out, I'm betting the through hike of those four is at least a hard full day trip in ideal weather.  A quick look at Mount Washington climate data shows that might happen for a few days in July, but anybody with any sense at all would know that they're going to be camping out in sub-zero temps and probably at least some sort of storm this time of year.

ETA: looks like the shortest route up Madison is 8.2 miles with a 4100' elevation gain.  Book time a little over six hours.  She was found between Madison and Adams, and activated the beacon somewhere around 10 hours after she was dropped off.  Doesn't sound like she would have made it to Washington and down by sunset, even if the weather had been quite a bit better.