Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Ben on April 25, 2015, 01:11:29 PM

Title: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Ben on April 25, 2015, 01:11:29 PM
New seismic surveys put it at around 14 times the size of the Grand Canyon.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/24/us/yellowstone-supervolcano-magma-reservoir-discovery/

Interesting perspective on size: If you piled all the humans that ever live in the history of the world into the Grand Canyon, they would not fill it.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Scout26 on April 25, 2015, 02:23:16 PM
I thought they figured out years ago that ALL of Yellowstone is the Caldera.  Which might help better explain the rich soils of the mid-west better then the "Glaciers pushed the dirt down from Canada."
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: vaskidmark on April 25, 2015, 02:27:42 PM
First it was the fast food joints.  Then the sit-down restaurants (except the haute cuisine kind).  Now University of Utah scientists are supersizing the Yellowstone caldera.

Will there be no end to this?

stay safe.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Ben on April 25, 2015, 02:32:14 PM
I thought they figured out years ago that ALL of Yellowstone is the Caldera.  Which might help better explain the rich soils of the mid-west better then the "Glaciers pushed the dirt down from Canada."

Yellowstone = 3500 sq miles, Grand Canyon = 1900 sq miles. 1900*14=26,600 sq miles. Plus then the whole three dimensions thing. :)
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Brad Johnson on April 25, 2015, 02:41:21 PM
First it was the fast food joints.  Then the sit-down restaurants (except the haute cuisine kind).  Now University of Utah scientists are supersizing the Yellowstone caldera.

Will there be no end to this?

stay safe.

Dogs and cats sleeping together! MASS HYSTERIA!!

Brad
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: charby on April 25, 2015, 02:41:33 PM
I thought they figured out years ago that ALL of Yellowstone is the Caldera.  Which might help better explain the rich soils of the mid-west better then the "Glaciers pushed the dirt down from Canada."

Rich soils of Iowa and eastern Illinois is from the Peoria Loess deposition. That happened about 23,000 BP.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033589413000707

The ash from the last "Yellowstone" eruption would have been buried by the till of the Pre-Illinois glacier.

640,000 BP on Lava Creek eruption vs 300,000 retreat of the Pre Illinois glaciers. Any ash that wasn't buried by till would have been part of the pre Illinois inter glacial soils of the Yarmouth-Sangamon paleosoils. Those soils have been buried by post Illinois glacier/Wisconsin glacier and Peoria Loess.

Glaciers don't normally bulldoze, they absorb material and redeposit at the head. Think of a icy conveyor belt. When they retreat is when deposition occurs.

Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: WLJ on June 12, 2023, 09:18:05 AM
Came across this this morning

viewing now. The guy needs to slow down a bit, I know enough about geology to be dangerous.

Yellowstone Won't Explode And End Civilisation (Sorry) | The Deep Dive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypn3Fe_PLts

Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: RoadKingLarry on June 12, 2023, 09:33:48 AM
Quote
Yellowstone Won't Explode And End Civilization

Well, that's *expletive deleted*ing depressing.

 =(
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 12, 2023, 09:41:38 AM
"Interesting perspective on size: If you piled all the humans that ever live in the history of the world into the Grand Canyon, they would not fill it."

But it would be a damned good start and getting rid of humans and turning the planet over to dogs.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 12, 2023, 09:43:51 AM
"Rich soils of Iowa and eastern Illinois is from the Peoria Loess deposition. That happened about 23,000 BP. "

23,000 British Petroleum?

Yeah, I know I'm commenting on something posted nearly a decade ago.

So wot? :rofl:
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: 230RN on June 12, 2023, 05:57:01 PM
"BP"
https://www.thoughtco.com/bp-how-do-archaeologists-count-backward-170250

I got trapped into going through this thread and wondered about that.  I guess "BP" avoids  "AD" and "BC" and "CE" (Christian Era) and Julian Dates, etc, but seems like it would avoid confusion if a writer just said "years ago." 

It's just another SAUONA (Smart Assed Use Of Needless Acronyms)  which demonstrates laziness and is evidence of a childish "I know something you don't know, nyah-nyah!" mentality, or a slavish copying of a military style.

Or all three.

Communication, after all, is the goal of writing.

Even "minus 23ka" would have been better, and better recognized.  Everybody knows what "ka" means, right?

Terry  said that and he ain't takin' it back.

PS.  I thought it was recommended somewhere, rather than bumping old threads to make additional comments, it was better to start a new thread quoting the relevant parts one is commenting upon.  Can't find it, and it may be a rule from another board, but it sure makes sense.

Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: WLJ on June 12, 2023, 06:02:49 PM

It's just another SAUONA (Smart Assed Use Of Needless Acronyms)  which demonstrates laziness and is evidence of a childish "I know something you don't know, nyah-nyah!" mentality, or a slavish copying of a military style.


Saying 23,000 BP makes you sound more "educated" than saying 23,000 years ago.  ;/
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: 230RN on June 12, 2023, 06:15:13 PM
Saying 23,000 BP makes you sound more "educated" than saying 23,000 years ago.  ;/

Exactly.  My point.  "Showing off."  At root: "I know something you don't know, nyah-nyah!"

Terry said that and he ain't takin' that back, either.

I have seen "ka," for "thousand annums" which at least makes sense from a scientific nomenclature standpoint. But to me it's as awkward as saying kiloseconds.

"BCE" for "Before Christian Era"  just seems like a tawdry excuse for avoiding acknowledgement of Christ's real existence.  Kinda like Xmas.  But I was never sure whether Xmas honored Christ or not.  Sorta like JFK or HST or AOC (yuch), which are honorific forms of identification.

Terry, 230RN
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: WLJ on June 12, 2023, 06:33:14 PM

"BCE" for "Before Christian Era"  just seems like a tawdry excuse for avoiding acknowledgement of Christ's real existence.  Kinda like Xmas.  I was never sure whether Xmas honored Christ or not.  Sorta like JFK or HST or AOC (yuch), which are honorific forms of identification.

Terry, 230RN

BCE - Before Common Era

See! I'm more edjucated than you  :P
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: lee n. field on June 12, 2023, 07:42:06 PM
"BP"
https://www.thoughtco.com/bp-how-do-archaeologists-count-backward-170250

I got trapped into going through this thread and wondered about that.  I guess "BP" avoids  "AD" and "BC" and "CE" (Christian Era) and Julian Dates, etc, but seems like it would avoid confusion if a writer just said "years ago." 

It's just another SAUONA (Smart Assed Use Of Needless Acronyms)  which demonstrates laziness and is evidence of a childish "I know something you don't know, nyah-nyah!" mentality, or a slavish copying of a military style.

Or all three.

Communication, after all, is the goal of writing.

Even "minus 23ka" would have been better, and better recognized.  Everybody knows what "ka" means, right?

Terry  said that and he ain't takin' it back.

PS.  I thought it was recommended somewhere, rather than bumping old threads to make additional comments, it was better to start a new thread quoting the relevant parts one is commenting upon.  Can't find it, and it may be a rule from another board, but it sure makes sense.

Count time from the zero point of the Unix epoch, and give it to them in gigaseconds.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: 230RN on June 12, 2023, 08:08:10 PM
^ LOL  You'd need giganumbers for the exponent. Just happened to note, after another cuppa, that a kilosecond is about a quarter hour.  Damned calculators.  D'ja ever notice whenever one's in sight, you have to pick it up and play with it?
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 12, 2023, 09:08:52 PM
BCE - Before Common Era

See! I'm more edjucated than you  :P

"Before Common Era" is just a work-around for "Before Christian Era."
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 12, 2023, 09:10:42 PM
Damned calculators.  D'ja ever notice whenever one's in sight, you have to pick it up and play with it?

Well, since you asked ... why, no, I have never noticed that nor have I ever encountered anyone who seemed to be so afflicted.  >:D
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Northwoods on June 13, 2023, 01:14:14 AM
Even attention whores like NdGT still use AD and BC because he wants to honor the priests that devised the Gregorian calendar, despite the militant atheists (of which he otherwise is one) trying to berate him into using CE and BCE.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 06:36:58 AM
"BP"
https://www.thoughtco.com/bp-how-do-archaeologists-count-backward-170250





 ;/

Jokes...

You get them, right?
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 06:44:27 AM
There's only one way around this Christy McFreaking Christ is the center of everything! calendar problem...

Use it or lose your head.

(https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.be816cca50ca58d6182a427df22023bd?rik=qRR0j94a1Rt4fg&riu=http%3a%2f%2fwww.essaydocs.org%2freligion-and-the-french-revolution-thesis-statements%2f28248_html_25d94266.png&ehk=55qLwy3SzxrGfTkDQWgMrNP82wIrnBa34%2fN5doCzCrk%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0)
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 13, 2023, 07:54:24 AM
Even attention whores like NdGT still use AD and BC because he wants to honor the priests that devised the Gregorian calendar, despite the militant atheists (of which he otherwise is one) trying to berate him into using CE and BCE.

Who or what is NdGT?

[insert customary rant about unexplained acronyms]
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 08:00:05 AM
Neil de Grasse Tyson
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Ben on June 13, 2023, 08:17:01 AM
Who or what is NdGT?

[insert customary rant about unexplained acronyms]

WDYMUA?
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 08:24:45 AM
"WDYMUA"

Uhm...

What Do You Mean You ahole?

 :rofl:
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Ben on June 13, 2023, 08:27:38 AM
"WDYMUA"

Uhm...

What Do You Mean You ahole?

 :rofl:

I was going for, "What do you mean unexplained acronyms?", but whatever works.  =D
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: WLJ on June 13, 2023, 08:29:54 AM
Even attention whores like NdGT still use AD and BC because he wants to honor the priests that devised the Gregorian calendar, despite the militant atheists (of which he otherwise is one) trying to berate him into using CE and BCE.

Someone just hasn't handed him the right amount of money for him to do differently yet. I don't think he does anything unless there's money to be had and/or pump up his Hollywood/political star stats. I can't stand the pompous ass.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Ben on June 13, 2023, 08:39:20 AM
I can't stand the pompous ass.

I will never forgive him.

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic1.squarespace.com%2Fstatic%2F5aeb2d61ec4eb71db6368339%2F5c35b5e02483d60902134b5f%2F5c35b7d82483d6090213a378%2F1547024344920%2Fplutoweak.jpg%3Fformat%3Doriginal&hash=737beb1eec6fe11eef2ee4a20b45f816d2ad7734)
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: WLJ on June 13, 2023, 08:49:52 AM
(https://uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/pluto-memes-03-grandpa-simpson.jpeg?w=625)
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 09:21:20 AM
Uhm....

Neil deGrasse Tyson did NOT demote Pluto.

The International Astronomical Union did demote Pluto.

Yes, Tyson was an advocate for it. But it wasn't his decision.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: WLJ on June 13, 2023, 09:27:51 AM
Uhm....

Neil deGrasse Tyson did NOT demote Pluto.

The International Astronomical Union did demote Pluto.

Yes, Tyson was an advocate for it. But it wasn't his decision.

Yes I know that.
But he's made himself the defacto poster boy for it and loves jumping into the limelight every time someone brings up reversing that decision. Someone wants to make Pluto a planet again? Look at me!! I'm the unquestionable expert on everything!
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Ben on June 13, 2023, 09:29:12 AM
Uhm....

Neil deGrasse Tyson did NOT demote Pluto.

The International Astronomical Union did demote Pluto.

Yes, Tyson was an advocate for it. But it wasn't his decision.

That's exactly how Neil DeGrasse Tyson would respond.

 :rofl:
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 09:39:42 AM
That's exactly how Neil DeGrasse Tyson would respond.

 :rofl:

OK, you caught me.

I AM Neil deGrasse Tyson.

Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Ben on June 13, 2023, 09:40:49 AM
OK, you caught me.

I AM Neil deGrasse Tyson.

That explains so much...   :laugh:
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 09:54:13 AM
That explains so much...   :laugh:

Don't go away in a scientific snit just because Uranus Hertz...
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: cordex on June 13, 2023, 09:56:47 AM
(https://diggitymarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/neil-degrass-tyson-badass-meme.jpeg)
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Hawkmoon on June 13, 2023, 09:56:57 AM
WDYMUA?

 [ar15]  :rofl:  :old:
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: 230RN on June 13, 2023, 10:07:22 AM
I took it as "Unknown Acronym."  (Had to look up NdeGT.)

Uhm....

Neil deGrasse Tyson did NOT demote Pluto.

The International Astronomical Union did demote Pluto.

Yes, Tyson was an advocate for it. But it wasn't his decision.

Make yourself a target and people shoot at you.

Pluto has enough mass / gravity to have five recognized, named, moons: Charon, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra.

My vote is it's a planet, but my vote doesn't count worth a fart in a hurricane.

Terry, 230RN
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: K Frame on June 13, 2023, 10:11:39 AM
"Make yourself a target and people shoot at you."

Yep...

(https://th.bing.com/th/id/OIP.P3NpZkCDXOVzh4Dnq5iDHQHaEK?pid=ImgDet&rs=1)
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: 230RN on June 13, 2023, 07:28:25 PM
...

        (https://www.ambushfishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/iStock-1055631944-1030x686.jpg)
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: JTHunter on June 13, 2023, 11:24:35 PM
IIRC, the Yellowstone caldera is about 30 miles wide by 40 long and, as such, is the largest super-volcano caldera in the world.
Title: Re: Yellowstone Supervolcano Larger Than Previously Thought
Post by: Northwoods on June 14, 2023, 01:28:26 AM
If Jellystone blows, it’ll *expletive deleted*ck us all up.  But so will the Cascadia Subduction Zone slipping, or Biden winning reelection.