Armed Polite Society
Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: brimic on June 22, 2016, 09:18:44 PM
-
Moar cry bullying from the thought police:
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_575eb41de4b053e2197933bf?fb_action_ids=10209552129870780&fb_action_types=og.comments&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B1255076151178689%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.comments%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D
-
"You must think like I think or you are wrong and need to be punished" seems to be the gist of the article.
-
The article is wrong. Acceptance is not enough. You may think that your political activism for gay rights, or transgender rights is enough. You may think it's enough, to merely write absurd, fire-and-brimstone articles about how not loving the gay puts one in danger of hell-fire. You may think you're doing enough by simply owning a gay nightclub, where you officiate gay weddings; or by performing surgeries to help people transition to their true gender.
But that's not enough. You're still part of the problem. You still walked into Pulse with that Islamic terrorist Christian right extremist Wayne LaPierre person who failed to embrace everything you've been browbeat into believing about the LGBTQ+Whatever Else They Add To This Ridiculous Acronym, and killed all of those people, and then stole their lunch money, raped their corpses, and misgendered them.
It's not enough to lazily add a Q and a plus sign to the LGBT acronym that was oh so progressive five years ago. No. You are a hateful person for thinking that you could simply use a letter and a mathematical symbol to represent everyone in the LGBTQ+BrFEPZDAX* community.
God hates people like you.
*Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Quacks, People Sexually Attracted to Arithmetic, Bronies, Furries, Ephebophiles, Pedophiles, Zoophiles, Dino-philes, Angel-philes, and X-files.
-
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
If they insist on more than tolerance, they might not be happy with what is provided.
-
LGBTQ+BrFEPZDAX*+/-ERPaDerp.
Fixed it for you.
-
So they are declaring (metaphorical) war on everyone who holds traditional values.
Regardless of whether the traditionalists tolerate them or not.
Traditional morality must be stomped out and replaced by the new "morality".
-
So they are declaring (metaphorical) war on everyone who holds traditional values.
Regardless of whether the traditionalists tolerate them or not.
Traditional morality must be stomped out and replaced by the new "morality".
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
-
From that great prophet Bob Hope, in the mid-70's: "I’ve just flown in from California, where they’ve made homosexuality legal. I thought I’d get out before they make it compulsory."
-
It has come to my attention that, in an earlier post, someone identifying as me used an offensive acronym that excluded members of the incest community, and those who identify as non-related to those family members with whom they are intimate. Also excluded were the nymphomaniac community, those sexually attracted to inanimate objects, and animals identifying as people, but sexually attracted to animals of the opposite sex.
I no longer identify as that bigoted person.
-
It has come to my attention that, in an earlier post, someone identifying as me used an offensive acronym that excluded members of the incest community, and those who identify as non-related to those family members with whom they are intimate. Also excluded were the nymphomaniac community, those sexually attracted to inanimate objects, and animals identifying as people, but sexually attracted to animals of the opposite sex.
I no longer identify as that bigoted person.
That was past Fistful who was a dick, present Fistful would never do such a thing, present Fistful is all-inclusive. Present Fistful disavows anything past Fistful might have done.
-
Micro-aggression! You know I always spell my name in lowercase, so as not to be intialist. How dare you?!
-
Micro-aggression! You know I always spell my name in lowercase, so as not to be intialist. How dare you?!
Present brimic is a dick and doesn't disavow it. >:D
-
I'm going to my safe space.
-
It has come to my attention that, in an earlier post, someone identifying as me used an offensive acronym that excluded members of the incest community, and those who identify as non-related to those family members with whom they are intimate. Also excluded were the nymphomaniac community, those sexually attracted to inanimate objects, and animals identifying as people, but sexually attracted to animals of the opposite sex.
I no longer identify as that bigoted person.
You forgot the necrophiliacs. What do you have against lovers of the dead? You bigoted ass.
Sent from my iPhone. Freaking autocorrect.
-
Point of order:
Can a person be called out on their bigotry within a safe space, or is that a micro-, macro-, or standard aggression?
-
Point of order:
Can a person be called out on their bigotry within a safe space, or is that a micro-, macro-, or standard aggression?
That would be a "divide by zero" error. Luckily, all the SJWs are innumerate and don;t mind they risk the entire space-time continuum with their antics.
-
I'm going to my safe space.
With or without your sock monkey? How does your sock monkey self identify.
Also masterbaition is a sin.
-
With or without your sock monkey? How does your sock monkey self identify.
Also masterbaition is a sin.
I would correct your misspelling, but that would be smartist.
My sock monkies identify as yo mama.
-
Oh, the horrible micro, nano, pico, femto, atto, zepto, and yocto aggressions contained in this thread . . .
-
Oh, the horrible micro, nano, pico, femto, atto, zepto, and yocto aggressions contained in this thread . . .
You forgot groucho, harpo, and zeppo.
-
My sock monkies identify as yo mama.
If sock monkey is my mama, she would have made you her little bitch years ago.
-
If sock monkey is my mama, she would have made you her little bitch years ago.
How do you know she doesn't?
-
How do you know she doesn't?
He posts on the Internet.
-
We've long been aware of charb's preoccupation with the sex lives of sock monkeys. We now learn it is Oedipal in nature. Yesterday, I might have tolerated, but condemned, such a seeming perversion. Having read the article in the OP, though, I may now say that I celebrate charby's diversity.
-
We've long been aware of charb's preoccupation with the sex lives of sock monkeys. We now learn it is Oedipal in nature. Yesterday, I might have tolerated, but condemned, such a seeming perversion. Having read the article in the OP, though, I may now say that I celebrate charby's diversity.
So you going to let me buy you a beer?
-
So you going to let me buy you a beer?
I will have to check Huffington Post, and see what the politics of that would be.
-
I will have to check Huffington Post, and see what the politics of that would be.
Called it a beer summit, it's good enough for the president.
-
Since the '60's, the Culture War has been a cold war......now, it appears to be heating up rapidly.
-
I didn't read the whole article. Did the author of the tolerance-is-hatred article use the words "passive terrorism"?
http://www.inquisitr.com/2826731/wearing-a-hijab-is-passive-terrorism-says-u-s-military-publication/
-
And we have to mourn this and we have to be sad that we live in a town, a state, a country where *expletive deleted*it like this happens. I mean, these are people trying to distance themselves from this crime. And we need to own this crime.
What people are trying to distance themselves from this crime? Not me -- I don't need to make myself any more distant from being a self-radicalized Islamic terrorist than I already am.
Why should I need to "own" this crime? I'm not a radical Islamic terrorist. I don't engage in mass murders, and I don't even fantasize over them in my dreams. No, I'm sorry -- I do NOT need to "own" this crime. If you want to own it -- be my guest.
Does this sniveling, self-serving little whiner even comprehend that Islamic (and other, to be fair) terrorists have killed hundreds of people around the world in the past ten years? "*expletive deleted*it like this" happens everywhere and anywhere, not just in the U.S. What this child-in-an-adult-body doesn't understand is that the United States has been largely spared having to deal with the "*expletive deleted*it" that other countries have been dealing with for years. Now, thanks to the current administration, the lid to Pandora's Box has been opened, and I don't think the evil will be easily stuffed back into the box.
-
I might fantasize a little about mass killing a bunch of scumbag terrorists. How else can I be an armchair tactical operator? =D
..........but that isn't really the same thing.
-
I'm sure nobody could possibly have seen this coming:
http://www.postregister.com/articles/news-daily-email-todays-headlines/2016/07/12/transgender-woman-arrested-voyeurism-target
I guess I can't boycott Target, since I never shop there anyway.
-
Happily, I can say that I'm boycotting Transget, as I had been known to patronize them on a fairly regular basis. I've not been there since they went full SJW, and don't plan to.
You know, it was right after they repented of their horrible hatecrime of segregating the boys and girls toys (I mean in the toy aisle, not in the bathroom), that Target helped me to understand a fundamental flaw in the left's anti-gender narrative.
They claim that gender is fluid, and exists on a spectrum. Or in other words, that it exists not at all. They further deny its existence by claiming that Target's toys, for instance, can't be assigned to any particular gender. It's unfair to label the laser-phaser space gun as a boy's toy, and the Susie CrysAtRomComs doll as a girl's toy, since that suggests the laser-phaser space gun is masculine, and the doll is feminine. Nothing can be assigned to the masculine or feminine character, since there is no difference. Even physical differences are merely accidents we may change or remove.
This brings us to those that change their physical bodies, in order to be the man or woman they claim to be. These people clearly think that gender is something that exists, and it must exist, for them, somewhere besides their bodies. So the transgender contradicts all the gender-denial of the left.
When will the left denounce these sexists in their own ranks?
Or perhaps there's something else going on here. Maybe gender is something the left will only recognize when it can be used as a grievance.
-
Boycotts don't do much anyway.
I'm sure nobody could possibly have seen this coming:
http://www.postregister.com/articles/news-daily-email-todays-headlines/2016/07/12/transgender-woman-arrested-voyeurism-target
I guess I can't boycott Target, since I never shop there anyway.
This is my shocked face. =|
-
This is my shocked face. =|
It looks just like your regular face...