Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Gewehr98 on January 25, 2007, 04:01:30 PM

Title: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Gewehr98 on January 25, 2007, 04:01:30 PM
I saw an episode of "Connections" where James Burke displayed a working version of a late 1800s facimile (fax) machine.   Not to be outdone, here's an original cell phone, GPS, ammo clip, and M4 carbine:  grin

Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: charby on January 25, 2007, 04:03:27 PM
I like it..  Smiley

Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 25, 2007, 04:05:39 PM
Our reliance is as old as we are, just about.

The more interesting question is how long we have depended on tech that relies on someone to sell us batteries, pump electrical juice into our house, fix our new-fangled fax machines, and so forth. 


Your telegraph machine is more like a land-line phone or fax, not at all like a cell phone.  The compass isn't a GPS unless you've got a map and protractor to go with it. 
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Gewehr98 on January 25, 2007, 04:36:07 PM
I figured Fistful would throw that my direction.  It's ok - I still see the "connection" (Thank you, James Burke!) to our current versions of those devices. 

I feel the collection there is pretty close to the oldest variant of a current technology, obviously with limitations. 

The telegraph repeater there is about close as one can get to our current dependancy on telephones/cellphones/blackberries, without jumping back to Pony Express riders or smoke signals from relay towers and hilltops. That particular telegraph sounder dates back to the 1870s, and I usually have it wired into a lighting detector circuit.  When the summertime thunderstorms approach here in Wisconsin, it starts clicking out a tempo well in advance of the lightning show. 

The compass took us that extra step when it came time to navigate across the oceans, we weren't totally dependant on watching the interaction of the waves or waiting for a cloudless night to find the North Star.

Black powder took hunting/killing/warfare etc. to the next level.  The Sharps (and the Trapdoor Springfield), likewise, heralded metallic centerfire cartridge use, along with the benefit of loading a firearm rapidly from the breech - which added momentum to the concept and gave us other folks like John Moses Browning, Hiram Maxim, Mikhail Kalashnikov, and Eugene Stoner.  The Sharps also survived the transition from black powder to smokeless, which in itself was an important innovation. 

Ok, now it's somebody else's turn to upload a photo of something vintage and make the "connection" to our current lives.   grin
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: MechAg94 on January 25, 2007, 07:04:23 PM
Considering tool making is one of the things that has allowed us to spread across the globe, I'd say quite a long time.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Headless Thompson Gunner on January 25, 2007, 07:22:44 PM
Two new developments came about at roughly the same time which allowed us to live the lives we do today.  The first of those was "natural philosophy", which was the beginning of the science and research that taught us how to design our modern technological wonders.  The second was the invention of modern commerce, things such as corporations and financial markets.  This provided us the access to wealth we needed in order to build and buy all these new technological widgets.  Both of these revolutions sprung out of Europe in the 16th and 17th centuries.  This time marked the beginning of the transition away from entire populations of self-sufficient and non-technology dependent people.  The American Civil War was probably the end of that transition, the time when it became painfully obvious to all that the old self-sufficient agrarian lifestyle was obsolete.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 26, 2007, 03:52:50 AM
Regarding the compass, I see what you're trying to say and I'll cede the point due to my ignorance of the history of navigation.  You may be wrong, for all I know, but you may be right.  Sorry, the wife makes me listen to Billy Joel.

Anyway, the telegraph is to the cell phone what the trebuchet is to the assault rifle.  The cell phone and rifle you can take anywhere, ready to use.  The telegraph and trebuchet require extensive construction in place before you have anything useful.  For a real analog to the cell-phone, try semafore, a bull-horn, walkie-talkies; all things you can take with you and are ready to go when you need to use them. 

Now that I think about it, cell phones and telegraphs both require some heavy hardware (cell towers and telegraph lines) to be installed ahead of time. Maybe they're closer than I at first thought. 
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: 280plus on January 26, 2007, 04:04:50 AM
You're forgetting smoke signals...

drums...
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Art Eatman on January 26, 2007, 04:48:30 AM
Wasn't it Marco Polo who brought back the "secret" of black powder, from China?  They had it, but aside from fireworks and rockets for amusement, they didn't really use it otherwise.

The compass is fairly old.  Even with the compass, however, the inability to tell time in any accurate fashion inhibited navigation.  At least for the Europeans; the Pacific islanders were masters at using the stars in cross-ocean travel.

Another connection is the sequence from Napoleon's need to feed his troops (via canned goods after the invention of canning) on to air conditioning (invented at Appalachicola, Florida) to imported meat (refirgerated ships).

The reason for clocks and all that gearworks was so they'd know the proper time for prayers at the monastery.  (Also from "Connections")

Art
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Sindawe on January 26, 2007, 06:43:59 AM
Quote
Our reliance is as old as we are, just about.

Exactly, and it dates from the days when this was the cutting edge of high technology.



Source: http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=1585222
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: 280plus on January 26, 2007, 07:04:07 AM
Those are some beautiful points...
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: roo_ster on January 26, 2007, 07:53:21 AM
Connections & James Burke is entertaining, as is the schlep Jared Diamond of "Guns Germs & Steel" fame.

Burke & Diamond tease a narrative out of history and present just-so stories to buttress their POV.  Like I said, entertaining.  Also heavily manipulative.

GGS: "Hey, there's a new* paradigm that geography determines a civilizations' success!  Who'd a thunk it?*"
Diamond argues that Eurasian civilization is not so much a product of ingenuity, but of opportunity and necessity. That is, civilization is not created out of sheer will or intelligence, but is the result of a chain of developments, each made possible by certain preconditions.
...
Hence Eurasia was able to support larger, denser populations, which made trade easier and technological progress faster than in other regions. These economic and technological advantages eventually enabled Europeans to conquer the peoples of the other continents in recent centuries.


*  The "geography shapes it all" POV has been around so long it has acquired its own jargon: environmental determinism.
Quote
Environmental determinism's origins go back to antiquity, when the Greek geographer Strabo wrote that climate influences the psychological disposition of different races. Similar ideas continued to be propounded up into the modern era.

Environmental determinism rose to prominence in the late 1800s and early 1900s when it was taken up as a central theory by the discipline of geography (and to a lesser extent, anthropology). Clark University professor Ellen Churchill Semple is credited with introducing the theory to the United States after studying with human geographer Friedrich Ratzel in Germany. The prominence of determinism was influenced by the high profile of evolutionary biology, although it tended more to resemble the now-discredited Lamarckism rather than Darwinism.

The fundamental argument of the environmental determinists was that aspects of physical geography, particularly that of climate, influenced the psychological mind-set of individuals, which in turn defined the behaviour and culture of the society that those individuals formed.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 26, 2007, 10:07:38 AM
Connections is possibly the greatest single survey show on world history that has ever been made. Not because it's so in-depth, but because it shows clearly that virtually no single event occurrs in a vacuum.

And it's quite the stretch to say that a compass is equivilent to GPS.

A sextant and a chronograph?

Yeah, I'd be up for that.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 26, 2007, 10:11:54 AM
The compass is fairly old.  Even with the compass, however, the inability to tell time in any accurate fashion inhibited navigation.  At least for the Europeans; the Pacific islanders were masters at using the stars in cross-ocean travel.

Not even close, Art. Europeans, in the form of Vikings and other water races, were masters of star navigation.

The Greeks were quite efficient at star navigation, as well.

Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Matthew Carberry on January 26, 2007, 10:12:05 AM
I also really enjoyed Burke's "The Day the Universe Changed" series.

It steps beyond the technology itself to the shifts in perception and thought that made some of the new tech possible.

As I was double checking the name I saw that the episodes are now available as podcasts for download.  
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Art Eatman on January 26, 2007, 10:23:22 AM
At the risk of talking past one another, Mike:  Without the chronometer, it was difficult to accurately predict a landfall when sailing north-south.  Via the Pole Star, one could have a pretty good idea of latitude, but absent telling time it was difficult fo discern longitude.  Prior to the sextant, anyway.

Art
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 26, 2007, 11:03:55 AM
It always comes back to sex for you two, doesn't it?  Sigh. 
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Gewehr98 on January 26, 2007, 12:00:00 PM
Quote
Burke & Diamond tease a narrative out of history and present just-so stories to buttress their POV.  Like I said, entertaining.  Also heavily manipulative.

I don't know who Diamond is, but I give the Oxford-educated James Burke a bit more credit than labeling his work as a "just-so" story.  His efforts are just a smidgen more than the average Kevin Bacon "6 Degrees of Separation" connections, if you know what I mean.   

For example, I'd wager Professor Burke would do a better job of connecting this early cordless analog number cruncher in my collection (Since I'll probably never get my own Babbage Difference Engine or Analytical Engine, let alone a replica Antikythera Mechanism, and my vintage abacus is buried in a box in the garage somewhere):



With this more recent cordless digital number cruncher:



Or even connect it as an ancestor to this boat anchor of a dual Pentium 4 Xeon IBM and the supporting devices:



Likewise, that precision time machine seen above the IBM on the kid's school desk is just one later iteration of John Harrison's H1 through H5 chronometers, including the H4 chronometer, which finally exhibited enough timekeeping accuracy to make possible usable latitude measurements by way of the aforementioned sextant.  (Another thing I'd like to have a replica of - the chronometers, that is.  I have a couple sextants, including an Air Force aircraft periscope version, and wish never to use the latter again...)

(Are we having fun yet?)

Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: wingnutx on January 26, 2007, 12:31:02 PM
"Connections" is a fantastic show, as is Burke's "The Day the Universe Changed".
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: InfidelSerf on January 26, 2007, 03:23:01 PM
Ptsssst..  for those that love Connections and various other educational materials...
good source of knowledge
Just avoid the forum discussions, as most of the people there are canucks and eurotrash that hate the US but love conspiracy theories :p
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Strings on January 26, 2007, 04:00:08 PM
I actually used a form of environmental determinism in an arguement with a racist once. His contention was that blacks were inferior, and the "proof" was the lack of civilization in sub-Saharan Africa at the time of colonial expansion. My counter was that civilization wasn't needed (at the time) to promote/perpetuate the species...
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: natedog on January 26, 2007, 05:41:28 PM
As old as people are. Humans have poor senses, little natural defenses or weapons, and are slow and weak (compared to other animals). Stripped completely naked, one could succumb to hypothermia in only 60* weather with a little bit of a wind chill (IIRC). Without something as basic as a house or clothes, most outside of the tropics would die of exposure pretty quickly.

 The only thing we have going for us are our brains, free forelimbs, and dextrious hands.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Matthew Carberry on January 26, 2007, 06:13:18 PM
As old as people are. Humans have poor senses, little natural defenses or weapons, and are slow and weak (compared to other animals). Stripped completely naked, one could succumb to hypothermia in only 60* weather with a little bit of a wind chill (IIRC). Without something as basic as a house or clothes, most outside of the tropics would die of exposure pretty quickly.

 The only thing we have going for us are our brains, free forelimbs, and dextrious hands.

Au contraire, you neglect my sparkling wit and impeccible fashion sense.  grin
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 26, 2007, 06:45:40 PM
Maybe none of us has noticed those, thus far.   angel
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Matthew Carberry on January 26, 2007, 08:50:20 PM
Maybe none of us has noticed those, thus far.   angel

Ow

Hopefully you won't notice my tears...  undecided
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Strings on January 26, 2007, 09:22:20 PM
fistful... did you hear anythng? I could sworn I heard somebody crying. What... just the wind? Oh... ok... :neener:
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Matthew Carberry on January 26, 2007, 09:25:26 PM
[milton voice]... I could burn down the forum...[/milton voice]
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 27, 2007, 03:34:24 AM
Yeaaaah, I'm just gonna go ahead take that stapler.  You won't need that down in the basement.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 27, 2007, 05:16:39 AM
Jesus, from Connections to Office Space in about 3 messages.

Lovely.

HERE'S YOUR FLAIR, STAN!
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Matthew Carberry on January 27, 2007, 09:13:55 AM
Considering that's how "Connections" worked, I think it highly appropriate.  grin

My favorite "Connections" episode (if I remember it right) was the one that started with an irrigation pump, that allowed deeper mining, that allowed cannon barrels to be end bored which made them much stronger than the welded types prior.

Because I like cannons.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 27, 2007, 09:20:25 AM
I remember that one, that was really good.

But, I think my favorite was the one about coal tar.

Does anyone know if Connections is available on DVD? If not, it damned well should be.

I've got some web searching to do.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 27, 2007, 09:24:05 AM
Reporting back results of search...

Amazon has a five-DVD set for.... $134.95.  shocked

That's the best price I could find in a short search.

I think I'll just wait for it to come on the History Channel again.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Brad Johnson on January 27, 2007, 09:28:25 AM
Quote
Connections to Office Space...

Stop whining or I'll set you an appointment with the two Bobs.

Speaking of History Channel, they have some darn interesting stuff in their online store and the prices usually aren't too outrageous.

Brad
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 27, 2007, 11:47:49 AM
"Stop whining or I'll set you an appointment with the two Bobs."

That's fine...

I HAVE PEOPLE SKILLS!
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Gewehr98 on January 27, 2007, 07:26:01 PM
Mike, if the Connections series is difficult for you to get on DVD, guess what...

They're downloadable for free.  Seriously.  See here:

http://clickcaster.com/connections

Be advised, they're in MP4 format, though. 
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 28, 2007, 06:28:49 AM
MP4.

Squap. I don't have any means of playing them.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Matthew Carberry on January 28, 2007, 10:03:05 AM
Duh, just turn your Mp3 player up one "p".   

Why do some people think this technology stuff is so hard?  rolleyes

Seriously, what the heck is Mp4?
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 28, 2007, 12:05:21 PM
Duh, just turn your Mp3 player up one "p".   

Why do some people think this technology stuff is so hard?  rolleyes

Seriously, what the heck is Mp4?

I don't like this technology. Last time I asked an MP if he could play my 3s, he gave me a wood shampoo.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 28, 2007, 07:43:52 PM
Wood shampoo?  That means a drubbing with a wooden club?  Huh?
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Matthew Carberry on January 28, 2007, 09:23:02 PM
Unless it was from a sailor MP...

get it?  wood?  shampoo?  sailor?

comedy gold  grin
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: 280plus on January 29, 2007, 01:31:13 AM
But a sailor would be an SP not an MP. 

Now THAT'S semantics!

 grin
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 29, 2007, 04:19:19 AM
Wood shampoo?  That means a drubbing with a wooden club?  Huh?

Yes.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Gewehr98 on January 29, 2007, 06:44:15 AM
I just watched the first of the series, using the latest version of the free QuickTime, which has no problems playing MPEG-4 (MP4) files.  Wink
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 29, 2007, 06:58:37 AM
How many Meg is the download?
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: mtnbkr on January 29, 2007, 07:00:34 AM
"Stop whining or I'll set you an appointment with the two Bobs."

That's fine...

I HAVE PEOPLE SKILLS!

Bwahahahahaaahhaaa <snort>

Cheesy

Chris
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: roo_ster on January 29, 2007, 07:04:53 AM
Office Space is an underappreciated classic of American cinema.

It is so gut-wrenchingly hilarious because us cube-farm-dwellers have worked with all the archetypes portrayed in the movie.

BTW, nobody touches my Swingline.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Gewehr98 on January 29, 2007, 07:15:04 AM
The first episode, "Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow" was 324 megs, no biggy for my cable modem, but for somebody on dial-up, I could see them having problems.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 29, 2007, 07:15:46 AM
"Bwahahahahaaahhaaa <snort>"

Chris snorted!


"Office Space is an underappreciated classic of American cinema."

The scene that REALLY cemented it for me was the one where the three of them are walking in the field, carrying baseball bats, and they proceed to beat the printer to death. The angles, the song, even thing about the scene was both hysterically funny AND made me want to take revenge on the printers that have given me grief over the years.

Crap. I'm going to have to buy Office Space now.

I still say Grandma's Boy is funnier, though.

"My Grandma drank my pot!"
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: K Frame on January 29, 2007, 07:18:30 AM
The first episode, "Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow" was 324 megs, no biggy for my cable modem, but for somebody on dial-up, I could see them having problems.

I got rid of the cable last year when it started failing miserably, and no one from the local butt munch festival known as Cox (yeah, that's appropriate) wanted to figure out why my connection speed would go from (literally over a period of 10 seconds) 2.5M to 110K to 1.1M to 305K to 7.5M to 55K... and it just kept doing that all the time. It was a freak show.

What I'll do is start the download and then go to dinner or something. Should take about an hour on my DSL.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 29, 2007, 07:19:48 AM
Man it feels good to be a gangsta. 

I say the best scene is Michael Bolton turning down his rap music and locking the doors when the flower salesman approaches. 
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: BakerMikeRomeo on January 29, 2007, 08:54:02 AM
Good choice on UPS selection, Gewehr. Powerware, ftw!

~GnSx

...
My dad works for Powerware Cheesy
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Gewehr98 on January 29, 2007, 10:45:53 AM
Thanks.  Now if I could just find the right data cable and software to go between that stack of Powerware Prestige UPS units and my computer, so it could do a graceful UPS-initiated shutdown...
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: roo_ster on February 08, 2007, 04:46:29 PM
Howdy:

I was a little bored and decided I wanted to download some of these programs (Connections, DUC).

Being the lazy b@st@rd I am, I automated the task after some judicious grep/sed/awk.  Those of you fortunate enough to be running linux or cygwin (under Windows) can download the attached tar file, untar it, chmod a+x the *tcsh files, and execute the tcsh scripts in the background(0).  If you get to the net via a proxy server, man wget to see how to modify the scripts.

To see how things are going, tail -f the *log file(s).

Those of you sadly without useful command-line tools can download the Conections & Day the Universe Changed with the urls below:

http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/yesterday-tomorrow-and-you.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/countdown.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/eat-drink-and-be-merry.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/the-long-chain.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/thunder-in-the-skies.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/the-wheel-of-fortune.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/faith-in-numbers.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/distant-voices.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/death-in-the-morning.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/the-trigger-effect.mp4


http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/worlds-without-end-changing-knowledge-changing-reality.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/making-waves-the-new-physics-newton-revised-.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/fit-to-rule-darwins-revolution.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/what-the-doctor-ordered-social-impacts-of-new-medical-knowledge.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/credit-where-its-due-the-factory-and-marketplace-revolution.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/infinitely-reasonable-science-revises-the-heavens-.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/a-matter-of-fact-printing-transforms-knowledge.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/point-of-view-scientific-imagination-in-the-renaissance.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/in-the-light-of-the-above-medieval-conflict-faith-and-reason-.mp4
http://clickcaster.com/resource/video/the-way-we-are-it-started-with-the-greeks.mp4


(0) As always, before running a script on your box, at least give it a quick look-see in a text editor to make sure it isn't something harmful.  These are one-liners, fortunately.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: slzy on February 08, 2007, 05:22:54 PM
i read once the YMCA[pre-village people] was founded in 1841,because with the advent of the Steam Engine,that people were atrophying and getting out of shape. the thought just occured to me as i write this,sports for the common man as opposed to nobility may have became possible. if they had became couch potatos by 1841, their grandfathers who were in wellingtons army must have been formidable. i have also read doc hollidays decline came with the railroads,one author said commuted like a modern urban dweller,where formally he had to take care of the horse and endure hard living on the trail.
Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: Perd Hapley on February 08, 2007, 05:32:47 PM
Wiki's entry gives the impression it had more to do with providing working-class young men with an alternative to dens of iniquity.  That would seem more in line with the name "Young Men's Christian Association."  Especially since the first one was founded in London.  It seems to me the steam engine would have had little effect on the musculature of urban folks.  Huh?

Title: Re: How old is our reliance on technology?
Post by: slzy on February 08, 2007, 06:20:59 PM
the steam engine took the work out of the fields and began the urbanization that continues.the idea of sports as healty work was formalized in 1865,so it must have been part of the program for some time. i looked up football in britain,and it starts picking up momentum in the early 1840s' even to the point of having home and away matches made possible to steam. i don't know much about the textile industry,but i imagine improvements in machinery caused some layoffs. it may also be no coincidence marx wrote the manifesto railing about the capitalists changing the means of production.i guess the talking heads were right about it being all stuck together.