Post by: Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas on February 19, 2008, 07:55:19 PM
*No, I won't ask her if her mom's a lesbian.
Post by: AZRedhawk44 on February 19, 2008, 08:02:37 PM
Post by: Bogie on February 19, 2008, 08:21:10 PM
Post by: Gewehr98 on February 19, 2008, 08:24:46 PM
Post by: Manedwolf on February 19, 2008, 10:39:53 PM
Post by: Jamisjockey on February 20, 2008, 02:41:54 AM
Exactly where in the Constitution is the government empowered to provide Health Care, or where is Health Care enumerated as a civil right regardless of financial capabilities or medical needs?
That right there is a winner. Watch her tapdance and bullshit her way through a well phrased question with substance and meaning.
Post by: S. Williamson on February 20, 2008, 02:47:46 AM
Post by: bdutton on February 20, 2008, 05:00:02 AM
Post by: mtnbkr on February 20, 2008, 05:24:16 AM
Chris
Post by: charby on February 20, 2008, 05:43:09 AM
Post by: Sergeant Bob on February 20, 2008, 07:07:31 AM
Is she also fond of cigars?
One more non political comment for Chelsea and this thread gets closed.
Chris
Chris
Another comment about the ability of Chelsea to deliver oral gratification will result in the thread being locked AND the offending poster's account being terminated.
And the user's account terminated?
Post by: mtnbkr on February 20, 2008, 07:14:32 AM
Chris
Post by: Bogie on February 20, 2008, 07:15:24 AM
Ask her about concealed carry on campus...
Post by: Sergeant Bob on February 20, 2008, 07:27:31 AM
No, I'll just change your avatar to Hillary.
Chris
Chris
Hey! Knock it off!
Post by: seeker_two on February 20, 2008, 07:35:55 AM
1. What positive characteristics of Hillary the Mother will Hillary the President bring to the job?
....and....
2. Did you get that package of stick-ons that Bogie sent you?
......Can I have a Janet Reno avatar instead?......
Post by: Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas on February 20, 2008, 08:17:45 AM
I do know the Clinton platform now: raise taxes. Free health care, more goodies in the Student Loans department. I think I heard her mention that Hillary's intending on a Department of Civil Rights/Liberties. Basically, all the students were bribed. Only the rich people will have to pay taxes. Hillary supports comprehensive immigration reform... no definite word on a border fence, just saying that employers that exploited illegals would be dealt with. Practically promised good, solid, liberal judges for the Supreme Court - and abortion's a likely 'litmus test' for 'em. Stem cells rock, ditto the UN and Koffi. Kyoto is good.
When Bill gets back to the White House, he'll be playing the role Laura Bush is, from what I could tell. I'm expecting a UN spot.
I'll have to try and make it to future Chelsea/Hillary rallies. Or maybe I'll go swoon at the next Obama rally.
Oh. Somebody read a poem before Chelsea came up. Impromptu thing, I believe. *Shudders*
I've got to try that with Barack.
Post by: ilbob on February 20, 2008, 08:35:10 AM
Is she also fond of cigars?
One more non political comment for Chelsea and this thread gets closed.
Chris
Chris
Another comment about the ability of Chelsea to deliver oral gratification will result in the thread being locked AND the offending poster's account being terminated.
And the user's account terminated?
Too bad you did not get a chance to ask her a real question. Did anyone get to ask a serious question? Get a serious answer?
Post by: ilbob on February 20, 2008, 08:36:23 AM
Only the rich people will have to pay taxes.
Thats pretty much the way it already is.
Post by: Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas on February 20, 2008, 08:59:46 AM
Quote
Did anyone get to ask a serious question? Get a serious answer?
Pretty much just a memorization game - you ask her a question, Chelsea replies with previously-memorized talking points. No direct answers, no hard questions. Well, one guy asked whether Hillary supported gay marriage. Chelsea responded that Civil Unions were in place, guy said "so it's off the table." No further response on that subject. No in-depth responses to certain areas - border control, etc.
Post by: CAnnoneer on February 20, 2008, 09:08:22 AM
Better yet, "Chelsea, would you rather have a gun and a cell phone, or just a cell phone next time somebody shoots at you?"
Post by: mtnbkr on February 20, 2008, 09:12:29 AM
......Can I have a Janet Reno avatar instead?......
No, you get Ron Paul in his underwear.
Better yet, "Chelsea, would you rather have a gun and a cell phone, or just a cell phone next time somebody shoots at you?"
She would want just a cellphone just like every other anti I've known.
Chris
Post by: Werewolf on February 20, 2008, 09:34:31 AM
One more non political comment for Chelsea and this thread gets closed.
Chris
Back in the day when Chelsea was the 1st Kid I was usually the 1st one to smack down anyone that got NASTY about her. She was just a kid. She wasn't a political figure and had nothing to do with her parents. Poking fun at her, making fun of her - very bad taste.Chris
Not so today.
She's a public figure. She's injected herself on to the political scene. She has made herself available to be ridiculed, made fun of etc. AND - she's no longer a kid. She's all growed up - a bona fide woman and all that.
I have to wonder - what if she were the Clinton's son or better yet what if Monica L was shilling for Hillary. Would the same smack down be applied to us if we made fun then?
Post by: mtnbkr on February 20, 2008, 09:43:53 AM
I have to wonder - what if she were the Clinton's son or better yet what if Monica L was shilling for Hillary. Would the same smack down be applied to us if we made fun then?
Yes. If all you have is personal attacks, then you really don't have much at all.
We conservatives are supposed to be the party of logic and self control...or does that not apply when we can belittle someone for their appearance?
Chris
Post by: charby on February 20, 2008, 09:44:39 AM
I have to wonder - what if she were the Clinton's son or better yet what if Monica L was shilling for Hillary. Would the same smack down be applied to us if we made fun then?
There is one thing to make fun of someone. Sexual type of fun making isn't tolerated.
Post by: Jamisjockey on February 20, 2008, 09:51:00 AM
One more non political comment for Chelsea and this thread gets closed.
Chris
Back in the day when Chelsea was the 1st Kid I was usually the 1st one to smack down anyone that got NASTY about her. She was just a kid. She wasn't a political figure and had nothing to do with her parents. Poking fun at her, making fun of her - very bad taste.Chris
Not so today.
She's a public figure. She's injected herself on to the political scene. She has made herself available to be ridiculed, made fun of etc. AND - she's no longer a kid. She's all growed up - a bona fide woman and all that.
I have to wonder - what if she were the Clinton's son or better yet what if Monica L was shilling for Hillary. Would the same smack down be applied to us if we made fun then?
Maybe you should start a thread just for making fun of the looks of those in politics you don't like.
Of course with the Klintons, there is so damn much bad about them that you can go on and on without even bothering to insult thier apperance or sexual behaviour.
Post by: BrokenPaw on February 20, 2008, 09:52:27 AM
-BP
Post by: mtnbkr on February 20, 2008, 09:55:40 AM
Can we at least make fun of fistful for his looks? Can we at least have that much?
-BP
-BP
I dunno, he seems like such an easy target.
Chris
Post by: K Frame on February 20, 2008, 10:18:31 AM
This is the POLITICS PLACE.
It is NOT the Middle School Locker Room.
It is NOT the Masturbatory Fantasies Club for Repressed Men Who Spend too much Time on the Internet.
Bill Clinton's sexual proclivities WERE political in nature for obvious reasons.
Hillary's are NOT.
Obama's are NOT.
Chelsea Clinton's are NOT.
If you feel the need to drop back to the level of a pimply faced teenager, do so somewhere else -- NOT in this forum.
Understood?
Post by: K Frame on February 20, 2008, 10:22:51 AM
I have to wonder - what if she were the Clinton's son or better yet what if Monica L was shilling for Hillary. Would the same smack down be applied to us if we made fun then?"
And, I have to wonder....
What part of Armed POLITE Society covers making fun of an individual's physical attributes in a POLITICAL forum?
What part of such comments would be ON TOPIC for a POLITICAL forum?
Post by: Sergeant Bob on February 20, 2008, 10:38:11 AM
Post by: Bogie on February 20, 2008, 11:33:29 AM
I'd like to ask Chelsea if she ever gets tired of her armed guards.
Post by: K Frame on February 20, 2008, 11:41:47 AM
It is NOT here.
Is that so terribly difficult to understand?
Post by: Jamisjockey on February 20, 2008, 12:56:20 PM
Quote
"She's a public figure. She's injected herself on to the political scene. She has made herself available to be ridiculed, made fun of etc. AND - she's no longer a kid. She's all growed up - a bona fide woman and all that.
I have to wonder - what if she were the Clinton's son or better yet what if Monica L was shilling for Hillary. Would the same smack down be applied to us if we made fun then?"
And, I have to wonder....
I have to wonder - what if she were the Clinton's son or better yet what if Monica L was shilling for Hillary. Would the same smack down be applied to us if we made fun then?"
And, I have to wonder....
Weak. Especially when we're talking the Klintons. While there is a sopmoric joy in making fun of someone's looks, I think Hillary's political positions make it that anybody with 2 brain cells that might rub against each other in the dark can think of much better things to bag on them for. Like, for instance, how in the Hell does Chelsea know what its like to be just a common college student, or a middle class American? She spent 8 years of her life in the White House. Before that in the Guberners mansion.
That, and what makes her and her disgusting, royalty-wanna-be family think that there is something in the constitution that its "Free Health Care for all", and that the "rich" have to pay for it all?
That, and if I was going to lob insults at her, I'd call her a Commie, a Pinko, a Socialist, a Liberal. I'd remind her that Robin Hood was a common disgusting criminal who should have been lynched.
I'd remind her that the poor, working class slobs can't rely on the police every waking second of every day, and that to remove their means of self defense is unconstitutional and immoral.
Oh, yeah, but instead, maybe I should just stoop to insulting her looks, her dad's sexual activity, or Fistful.
Post by: Bogie on February 20, 2008, 01:30:58 PM
I still would like to know what she thinks about having armed guards around all the time...
Post by: Bogie on February 20, 2008, 01:49:54 PM
Post by: seeker_two on February 20, 2008, 01:51:32 PM
......Can I have a Janet Reno avatar instead?......
No, you get Ron Paul in his underwear.
....it's all going according to my plan.....
Just so everyone is very very clear on the concept...
This is the POLITICS PLACE.
It is NOT the Middle School Locker Room.
It is NOT the Masturbatory Fantasies Club for Repressed Men Who Spend too much Time on the Internet.
Bill Clinton's sexual proclivities WERE political in nature for obvious reasons.
Hillary's are NOT.
Obama's are NOT.
Chelsea Clinton's are NOT.
If you feel the need to drop back to the level of a pimply faced teenager, do so somewhere else -- NOT in this forum.
Understood?
This is the POLITICS PLACE.
It is NOT the Middle School Locker Room.
It is NOT the Masturbatory Fantasies Club for Repressed Men Who Spend too much Time on the Internet.
Bill Clinton's sexual proclivities WERE political in nature for obvious reasons.
Hillary's are NOT.
Obama's are NOT.
Chelsea Clinton's are NOT.
If you feel the need to drop back to the level of a pimply faced teenager, do so somewhere else -- NOT in this forum.
Understood?
Well....there goes 90% of the anti-Ron Paul conversation......
Okay, okay...
I still would like to know what she thinks about having armed guards around all the time...
I still would like to know what she thinks about having armed guards around all the time...
Good question......
Post by: mtnbkr on February 20, 2008, 02:29:54 PM
Well....there goes 90% of the anti-Ron Paul conversation......
Good point. The policy stands regardless of the person in question.
Chris
Post by: seeker_two on February 23, 2008, 06:55:29 PM
Well....there goes 90% of the anti-Ron Paul conversation......
Good point. The policy stands regardless of the person in question.
Chris
Sure got quiet around here, Chris......
Post by: mtnbkr on February 23, 2008, 07:31:29 PM
A thread killa
Chris
Post by: zahc on February 28, 2008, 07:06:47 PM
Post by: Zardozimo Oprah Bannedalas on February 29, 2008, 10:33:24 AM
Post by: zahc on March 04, 2008, 04:15:01 AM
Post by: LAK on March 18, 2008, 03:35:10 AM
The one that appears to be a phoenix rising up with spread wings clutching a globe (Or is that the globe). The same one I have seen some mid east or indo-pakistani woman wearing standing next to Laura Bush in a TIME magazine article photo, the same one I have seen Madelaine Albright in a photo some years ago.
-----------------------
http://searchronpaul.com
http://ussliberty.org/oldindex.html
http://www.gtr5.com
http://ssunitedstates.org
Post by: mtnbkr on March 18, 2008, 03:50:29 AM
Chris
Post by: Fly320s on March 18, 2008, 04:14:39 AM
edit: removed photo since LAK has answered below. No need to post photo of Hillary around here; might offend some sensabilities.
Post by: LAK on March 18, 2008, 04:23:06 AM
Ah; googled some key words and up they come. Betty Currie wore it when testifying concerning the Lewinsky affair. And McCain's wife, Cindy has worn one among others.
Odd it has been around for so long, yet only now - that attention is focussed on it - it has been handily dubbed "the Hillary pin", and is "officially" known as "the Liberty eagle". In closer photos it did not look like an eagle to me. In the googled articles no close up photos appear. The INSIGHT link "can not be found".
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17395
http://www.insightmag.com/archive/200002049.shtml
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a389b7512448f.htm
Aha; this (link below) is probably what is being referred to as the "Liberty Eagle" - the "I support the president" pin. And it does pretty much look like the one you see throughout U.S. emblem, seal items etc. And it is clearly NOT the same thing that I am speaking of, or appears in other photos. Wonder why the articles/writers all seem to be fogging the two pins as being the same thing.
http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2007/09/14/news/local/doc46ea16cdc36aa940727780.img
Sorry I couldn't post the photo, but for some reason I have never been able to get photos to upload onto the APS site.
Now, this is the one I speak of; worn by Albright, Clinton, and the eastern lady with Laura Bush. Compare this with the "Liberty Eagle"; there is no mistaking that they are two completely different items.
http://www.antiquingonline.com/cgi.bin/Web_store/Html/AHEP.htm
---------------------------
http://searchronpaul.com
http://ussliberty.org/oldindex.html
http://www.gtr5.com
http://ssunitedstates.org