Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: Ben on January 10, 2017, 10:01:06 AM

Title: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 10, 2017, 10:01:06 AM
Thought I'd start a general topic on the confirmation hearings starting today. Keeping in mind that Obama's appointments pretty much breezed through, it'll be interesting to see how this dog and pony show goes.

Sessions is up first. So far I've seen that Cory Booker, for the first time in history, will be one Senator testifying against another senator. Nevermind that Sessions worked with Booker on race issues. Also there are punks dressed in KKK sheets, Code Pink, etc. in the audience. Plus right now I'm listening to Diane Feinstein listing a bunch of things an AG should not be, which coincidentally, seem to be describing the current and prior AGs.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 10, 2017, 10:28:02 AM
I've been trying to watch/listen, but I think I have to give up. Every five freakin' minutes, some punk(s) in the audience stand up and start yelling until they're escorted out. When you see how they act, it seems difficult for a normal person not to want to end up supporting sessions more. I'm only going from memory, but  I don't recall this childish activity during any dem confirmations. People may have something to say, but the generally use a different venue versus disrupting the floor to the annoyance of all.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: HankB on January 10, 2017, 10:42:46 AM
. . .  Every five freakin' minutes, some punk(s) in the audience stand up and start yelling until they're escorted out. When you see how they act, it seems difficult for a normal person not to want to end up supporting sessions more . . .
This.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 10, 2017, 11:41:17 AM
I'm only going from memory, but  I don't recall this childish activity during any dem confirmations. People may have something to say, but the generally use a different venue versus disrupting the floor to the annoyance of all.


That's been a long-standing difference between the two sides. Even when we get out and protest, we do it in a much more orderly fashion.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: zxcvbob on January 10, 2017, 11:49:54 AM
Wife was watching it this morning, and was literally yelling at the TV at Sessions when he said he'd recuse himself from any Clinton cases.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: grampster on January 10, 2017, 11:50:04 AM
One hopes the nitwits will continue with the aberrant behavior.  More Democrats will fall by the wayside because of it. [popcorn]
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 10, 2017, 11:57:47 AM
Wife was watching it this morning, and was literally yelling at the TV at Sessions when he said he'd recuse himself from any Clinton cases.

I actually understand why he would have to do that, whether I like it or not. Certainly things at that point would hinge on his deputy(s).


I understand that there will be some fairly contentious 2nd amendment questioning. There's no way I'm listening through this whole thing to hear that.  I wonder if there's any site that has some kind of indexed videos or audios of various subjects he responds to?
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: KD5NRH on January 10, 2017, 01:28:50 PM
Even when we get out and protest, we do it in a much more orderly fashion.

Tar and feathers make a huge mess if you're not careful when handling them.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 10, 2017, 02:30:21 PM

That's been a long-standing difference between the two sides. Even when we get out and protest, we do it in a much more orderly fashion.

And I suspect it is mentioned somewhere in "Rules for Radicals". That way when we say, "look, nobody went off the deep end with Obama's appointees", they can say "because they were such great picks, who would interrupt the hearings to protest them!?!".
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 10, 2017, 03:37:35 PM
True. There does seem to be an element of theater to it. The Left enjoys a friendly, collaborationist media that will put their antics in a sympathetic light, or at least report that those controversial Republicans are being protested again. Let us try that, and we're extremist, racist deplorables, trying to keep the Little Rock Nine out of the school-house, etc.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Jamisjockey on January 10, 2017, 04:10:17 PM
I only caught a minute of it, but Sessions said that crime is up in America.
Great.  Another fear monger.
Violent crime is 16.5% lower than 10 years ago.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/latest-crime-statistics-released

Out with the old bosses, in with new bosses.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 10, 2017, 05:13:06 PM
I only caught a minute of it, but Sessions said that crime is up in America.
Great.  Another fear monger.
Violent crime is 16.5% lower than 10 years ago.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/latest-crime-statistics-released

Out with the old bosses, in with new bosses.


The headline on that story you link to says violent crime is up. I'm not sure what Sessions was referring to (did he mean long-term, or short-term?), but there has been an increase in violent crime, recently. The Ferguson Effect...
Title: Re:
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on January 10, 2017, 05:20:53 PM
So much posturing
Short of him committing a felony and breaking 2 commandments during the questions he's a lock.all this is role playing for the constituents

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
Title: Re:
Post by: Ben on January 10, 2017, 05:55:20 PM
So much posturing
Short of him committing a felony and breaking 2 commandments during the questions he's a lock.all this is role playing for the constituents

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Though I understand Tillerson will not be a lock. I heard mention, though I didn't hear names, that several Rs are looking at voting against. I haven't heard of any dems breaking with their party to cancel that out.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on January 10, 2017, 06:21:38 PM
After the shellacking I got thinking trump was gonna lose I am afraid to be too sure. But this is an insider deal. They are like key lawyers and doctors. They look out for their own.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Jamisjockey on January 10, 2017, 08:40:00 PM

The headline on that story you link to says violent crime is up. I'm not sure what Sessions was referring to (did he mean long-term, or short-term?), but there has been an increase in violent crime, recently. The Ferguson Effect...

Over a one year span.  The overall trend of violent crime is down 16% in the last 10 years.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on January 10, 2017, 09:14:18 PM
Changes in how agencies record and report crime can affect numbers.  Much shenanigans there


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on January 10, 2017, 09:15:23 PM
http://www.latimes.com/local/cityhall/la-me-crime-stats-20151015-story.html


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Jamisjockey on January 11, 2017, 08:43:47 AM
http://www.latimes.com/local/cityhall/la-me-crime-stats-20151015-story.html


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

And right there it says with the irregularities factored in there was still a drop in violent crime.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: RoadKingLarry on January 11, 2017, 09:12:43 AM
And right there it says with the irregularities factored in there was still a drop in violent crime.

Not really trying to contradict but we need to remember, the same folks telling us crime is down are the same ones taking credit for making it happen.
I just have major trust issues with pretty much anything the government tells me. Particularly  if it makes their ham handed, border line (at best) unconstitutional tactics look better.
I'm cautiously optimistic about Sessions as AG. Only time will tell but he has to be, just HAS TO BE better than Holder and Lynch.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 11, 2017, 09:18:58 AM
Only time will tell but he has to be, just HAS TO BE better than Holder and Lynch.

Certainly better than Holder - that's an extremely low bar. While I obviously don't approve of Lynch, I'm not sure she has ever done anything "worse" than some AGs under Republican administrations - she's just done stuff I don't like. Holder clearly broke the law and crapped on the constitution.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: K Frame on January 11, 2017, 09:19:41 AM
Over a one year span.  The overall trend of violent crime is down 16% in the last 10 years.

Oddly enough, the recent spike in crime has pretty directly matched the BLM movement and the response by police in pulling back from, and in some cases out of, communities...

Funny how that working...
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 11, 2017, 09:21:28 AM
I didn't watch the hearing, so I had to look it up. I don't know which part of Sessions' remarks you're referring to, Jamis, but this is what I'm seeing in the transcript.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/10/us/politics/sessions-remarks-transcript.html

Quote
Drug use and murders are half what they were in 1980.

Right there, I think he's addressed your point. He acknowledges that crime rates have come down. He goes on to say:

Quote
I am very concerned, however, that the recent jump in the violent crime and murder rates are not anomalies, but the beginning of a dangerous trend that could reverse the hard won gains that have made America a safer and more prosperous place. The latest official F.B.I. statistics show that all crime increased nearly 4 percent from 2014 to 2015 with murders increasing nearly 11 percent — the largest single-year increase since 1971.

Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 11, 2017, 10:28:33 AM
Just watching a bit of the Tillerson hearings. If this is political theater, the dude is the star of the show. Right now he's making Rubio look like a desperate 12 year old in his first debate.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: roo_ster on January 11, 2017, 10:33:27 AM
Just watching a bit of the Tillerson hearings. If this is political theater, the dude is the star of the show. Right now he's making Rubio look like a desperate 12 year old in his first debate.

Kind of to be expected.  I am not a big Tillerson fan, but you don't get to be CEO of such a megacorp by being a shallow twit with a pretty face.  Like Rubio.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: RevDisk on January 11, 2017, 11:17:03 AM
Just watching a bit of the Tillerson hearings. If this is political theater, the dude is the star of the show. Right now he's making Rubio look like a desperate 12 year old in his first debate.

ExxonMobile is a $268.88 billion company. $349.49 billion in assets. While they don't own as much oil as some state-owned companies, they are the largest refiner in the world.

This is the dollar equivalent of the GDPs of South Africa, Pakistan or Columbia. Not government revenue, THE ENTIRE GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT. If you took the GDPs of the bottom ninety or so countries, you'd be looking as a similar amount of money.

You don't get to be CEO of that sort of company by being a moron or being unable to handle stressful circumstances. That doesn't necessarily mean you want the guy in that position, but it doesn't automatically rule them out. I'd want to be dead certain that the man was being loyal to the country, not putting other things ahead of that.

Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: roo_ster on January 11, 2017, 11:33:12 AM
Ted Cruz, in his element:
http://ijr.com/wildfire/2017/01/775136-ted-cruz-steals-the-show-at-jeff-sessions-hearing-with-a-pummeling-for-democrats-that-has-to-be-seen/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=owned&utm_campaign=ods&utm_term=ijamerica&utm_content=politics

In the Senate chewing the butts off Democrats or on SCOTUS is where Ted belongs.  Ted shouldn't get the Scalia slot, as that would be too easy.  No, he needs to replace Ginsburg to maximize the number of exploded heads on the Left. Ted is only 46 years old.  We could see him do his thing for DECADES on SCOTUS.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 11, 2017, 11:39:16 AM
Ted Cruz, in his element:
http://ijr.com/wildfire/2017/01/775136-ted-cruz-steals-the-show-at-jeff-sessions-hearing-with-a-pummeling-for-democrats-that-has-to-be-seen/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=owned&utm_campaign=ods&utm_term=ijamerica&utm_content=politics

In the Senate chewing the butts off Democrats or on SCOTUS is where Ted belongs.  Ted shouldn't get the Scalia slot, as that would be too easy.  No, he needs to replace Ginsburg to maximize the number of exploded heads on the Left. Ted is only 46 years old.  We could see him do his thing for DECADES on SCOTUS.

Yes, I was pretty impressed with him yesterday. I can't see any downsides to him in SCOTUS.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 11, 2017, 11:43:11 AM
That doesn't necessarily mean you want the guy in that position, but it doesn't automatically rule them out. I'd want to be dead certain that the man was being loyal to the country, not putting other things ahead of that.


Certainly. I had immediate reservations when I first heard of the appointment. As I've read and seen more, I have to say he impresses me. In his postion, he will have to make clear his separation from his previous life. I think he'll be able to do it, though I believe there will always be gadflys that cast doubt into that.

That goes across the political spectrum I guess. For my own part, I'm certainly guilty of always looking at Obama as being a community organizer versus leaving that behind when he became president.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: cassandra and sara's daddy on January 11, 2017, 11:52:43 AM
Bit more comprehensive with links that cover different depts as well as how the FBI fudges numbers

https://www.policeone.com/patrol-issues/articles/5736845-Fudge-factor-Cooking-the-books-on-crime-stats/


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: RoadKingLarry on January 11, 2017, 10:35:00 PM
As to under reported crime stats.

https://aminewswire.com/stories/511071497-chicago-homicides-even-higher-than-reported (https://aminewswire.com/stories/511071497-chicago-homicides-even-higher-than-reported)

An increase in justifiable homicides is still an increase in violent crime, wouldn't have ben a justifiable homicide with out some violent crime to justify.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 11, 2017, 10:36:32 PM
Ted is only 46 years old.  We could see him do his thing for DECADES on SCOTUS.


I'll be in my bunk.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 11, 2017, 10:38:37 PM
I'd want to be dead certain that the man was being loyal to the country, not putting other things ahead of that.


I heard from my neighbor's brother-in-law's uncle's friend that the Russians have all kinds of dirt on him.

They heard that on CNN.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Hawkmoon on January 11, 2017, 11:57:01 PM

I heard from my neighbor's brother-in-law's uncle's friend that the Russians have all kinds of dirt on him.

They heard that on CNN.

Can't be true unless confirmed by Buzzfeed.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: K Frame on January 12, 2017, 06:18:47 AM
"Can't be true unless confirmed by Buzzfeed."

Silly man. Everyone knows that Buzzfeed takes its fake news direction from Huffington Post and Politico.


And holy *expletive deleted*it, I've never paid any attention to Politico before, but I just visited their webpage...

There are multiple headlines for Trump stories, and with the exception of two that are fairly neutral, every one of them reads like the headline for a hatchet piece. They're all spun incredibly negatively.

I wish I had been paying attention to it over the last couple of years, especially during the election cycle.

I can only imagine the differential in the headlines...

"Hillary walks on water, cures the sick, and feeds a multitude with a pack of crackers"


"Trump kidnaps busload of small children, consumes their souls, and puts them to work as slaves in Trump Plaza kitchen."



And holy *expletive deleted*it, they have a story from May 2016 about how the GOP believes Hillary could cost Democrats in the Senate in the section titled Trump Transition.

How is old news that's going on a year old about the transition?


I think the GOP may be right. Politico isn't a newspaper -- it's a broadsheet for the DNC.

Just read some of the comments on various articles, too...

It's as if they simply linked in Democratic Underground.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Jocassee on January 12, 2017, 10:36:08 AM
"Can't be true unless confirmed by Buzzfeed."

Silly man. Everyone knows that Buzzfeed takes its fake news direction from Huffington Post and Politico.


And holy *expletive deleted*it, I've never paid any attention to Politico before, but I just visited their webpage...

There are multiple headlines for Trump stories, and with the exception of two that are fairly neutral, every one of them reads like the headline for a hatchet piece. They're all spun incredibly negatively.

I wish I had been paying attention to it over the last couple of years, especially during the election cycle.

I can only imagine the differential in the headlines...

"Hillary walks on water, cures the sick, and feeds a multitude with a pack of crackers"


"Trump kidnaps busload of small children, consumes their souls, and puts them to work as slaves in Trump Plaza kitchen."



And holy *expletive deleted*it, they have a story from May 2016 about how the GOP believes Hillary could cost Democrats in the Senate in the section titled Trump Transition.

How is old news that's going on a year old about the transition?


I think the GOP may be right. Politico isn't a newspaper -- it's a broadsheet for the DNC.

Just read some of the comments on various articles, too...

It's as if they simply linked in Democratic Underground.

The best part is that when Politico started, it was billed as a conservative outfit.

Then proceeded to go full establishment.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: KD5NRH on January 12, 2017, 10:56:27 AM
I'll be in my bunk, photoshopping Ron Paul's face into Kennedy's spot in the SC official group portrait.

FIFY
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 12, 2017, 01:52:14 PM
Mattis answers snowflake's question:

Quote
US needs to focus on a military so lethal it will be "our enemy's longest day and worst day when they run into that force."
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 18, 2017, 01:18:20 PM
http://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2017/01/18/bernie-sanders-tries-to-school-tom-price-with-access-comparison-steps-on-rake-instead/
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 18, 2017, 03:12:12 PM
I was on a hike when I heard that from Sanders or I would have beat you to posting on it. What a freakin' hypocrite. I may have yelled out loud when I heard that line.

Also, Patty Murray was "special" in her grilling of Price. Is she thinking of running for prez in 2020 too?

I again have to applaud Trump's picks. Every one that I have heard was cool as a cucumber under the grilling, and making the dems (and a few Rs) look like spoiled children.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: DittoHead on January 19, 2017, 12:20:39 PM
Rick Perry apparently had some groveling to do today in order to get his job:
Quote from: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/rick-perry-confirmation-hearing-233835
"In fact, after being briefed on so many of the vital functions of the Department of Energy, I regret recommending its elimination."
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 19, 2017, 05:07:57 PM
Steve Mnuchin impressed the hell out of me this morning. He outsmarted every Dem attack on him, to include stuff like actually calling bad loans bad loans. The Dems seemed to think that was gonna be a gotchya, but he turned it around on them beautifully. To include, when he was interrogated about stuff like the "missed $1 on the payment so were foreclosed on" line, pointing out that those foreclosures were incredibly painful for him, because as a private lender, he could have kept them from happening, but because they were Freddie and Fannie, the fed.gov forced him to do so or face legal penalties. :)

Also Claire McCaskill was a pill. I only heard her while driving, but she sounded like she was calling 911 and reporting a murder. Every question was breathless and tense. It sounded like she was working up the vapors and in need of a fainting couch. She especially sounded out of sorts because Mnuchin was so calmly answering questions and deflecting her political statements.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Perd Hapley on January 19, 2017, 05:26:28 PM
Also Claire McCaskill was a pill. I only heard her while driving, but she sounded like she was calling 911 and reporting a murder. Every question was breathless and tense. It sounded like she was working up the vapors and in need of a fainting couch. She especially sounded out of sorts because Mnuchin was so calmly answering questions and deflecting her political statements.


Uh, yup.
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: freakazoid on January 19, 2017, 07:21:01 PM
Bit more comprehensive with links that cover different depts as well as how the FBI fudges numbers

https://www.policeone.com/patrol-issues/articles/5736845-Fudge-factor-Cooking-the-books-on-crime-stats/


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Quote
Sgt. Borrelli has company. NYPD Officer Adrian Schoolcraft claims he was forcibly taken from his home and involuntarily put in a mental hospital where he spent six days — in retaliation for complaining his supervisors were cooking the books to make the crime rate seem lower.

 :O
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on January 25, 2017, 10:45:45 AM
I love this not because Musk is supporting Tillerson, but because it is making that jackwagon Michael Mann's head explode.  :laugh:

http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2017/01/25/michael-mann-isnt-happy-with-elon-musks-support-of-rex-tillerson/
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: MechAg94 on January 25, 2017, 11:34:59 AM
Bit more comprehensive with links that cover different depts as well as how the FBI fudges numbers

https://www.policeone.com/patrol-issues/articles/5736845-Fudge-factor-Cooking-the-books-on-crime-stats/


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Just read the first part, but it occurs to me this is just a natural reaction of a bureaucracy to negative statistics.  If the numbers don't look good, the easiest solution is to find a way to make the numbers look better rather than fix the problem.  The management drive from higher gets geared around the numbers rather than the work it is based on and the grunts at the bottom find it is easier to fudge a little rather than constantly catch grief from higher.  With so much politics involved, add in that they probably know half the stuff they do will make the numbers look worse. 

I have seen this with the statistics from maintenance management systems and the managers over those departments. 
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: K Frame on January 25, 2017, 12:36:14 PM
"but she sounded like she was calling 911 and reporting a murder."

She was...

The murder of the rights of millions of American women, minorities, blah blah blah blah blah...
Title: Re: Confirmation Hearings
Post by: Ben on February 08, 2017, 06:38:53 PM
Chuck Schumer has something to say regarding holding up cabinet confirmations:

http://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2017/02/08/when-flashbacks-attack-chuck-schumer-explains-why-the-president-deserves-his-choices-for-cabinet/