Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => The Roundtable => Topic started by: Fly320s on February 06, 2017, 10:57:15 AM

Title: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 06, 2017, 10:57:15 AM
I started this thread last year talking about the pilot shortage:  http://www.armedpolitesociety.com/index.php?topic=50991.0

I'm in my recurrent training session again and according to our recruiting department we will not have any qualified applicants in 4 years.  We have seen a steady decline in applicants for the last four years.  Other airlines are having the same problem.  Pay is going up everywhere.  The regional airlines are handing out big starting and retention bonuses.

So, if you want to fly planes for a living, start training now.  If you're lucky, in 4 years you could be flying with me and mocking JamisJockey on the radio.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: MillCreek on February 06, 2017, 11:08:35 AM
I always thought there was a steady pipeline of pilots leaving the military to go fly commercially.  What has happened to that?
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: BobR on February 06, 2017, 11:18:24 AM
I always thought there was a steady pipeline of pilots leaving the military to go fly commercially.  What has happened to that?

Downsizing of the military. Lack of operational aircraft that are airworthy means less hours. Higher retention bonuses for the military pilots they do have = less leaving the service after their first or second tour. Those are my SWAGs.

bob
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Ben on February 06, 2017, 11:20:17 AM
Fly320s, wasn't there in the last few years a reduction for max age? Did that have a big effect on numbers?  I wonder if they'll consider increasing age again if they get a shortage?
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: RevDisk on February 06, 2017, 11:25:07 AM
Last time I looked into it, it looked like a bad wager unless you're a military pilot. Starting pay isn't great, building hours on your own dime is expensive and you're always once bounced physical away from the unemployment line. Virtually no airlines last I looked had training programs, relying on the mil pipeline. So, it's entirely possible to get an insanely huge amount of debt and then be downchecked at any second due to high blood pressure or whatnot. I doubt you'd get a refund on all that debt and flight hours.

Bob hit the nail on the head.

Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Boomhauer on February 06, 2017, 11:41:52 AM
The airlines created their bed let them lie in it
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: wmenorr67 on February 06, 2017, 12:46:59 PM
Besides the "regional" carriers, working in the private sector is more lucrative pay wise and even better hours.

Woman I used to work with, her son started out flying for a doctor and now is flying for some other type of businessman and his company.  Started out making more money than his friends who went to work for airlines and such and has better benefits and work schedule.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Firethorn on February 06, 2017, 01:43:12 PM
You mentioned pay going up "everywhere".  I figure that sooner or later, that will start drawing people in, or airlines will have to bite the bullet and realize that they'll need to train their own pilots.  Perhaps get with the other airlines and offer generous scholarships.  Etc...

It's the nature of an 'efficient' economy to always be running just short of a shortage.  If you have excess capacity, you're overpaying.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: KD5NRH on February 06, 2017, 02:56:01 PM
It's the nature of an 'efficient' economy to always be running just short of a shortage.  If you have excess capacity, you're overpaying.

Trouble comes in determining what is "excess" and what is "safety margin" when you're talking about a mission critical resource.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 06, 2017, 02:56:17 PM
I always thought there was a steady pipeline of pilots leaving the military to go fly commercially.  What has happened to that?

Downsizing and drones.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 06, 2017, 02:57:12 PM
Fly320s, wasn't there in the last few years a reduction for max age? Did that have a big effect on numbers?  I wonder if they'll consider increasing age again if they get a shortage?

No.  The mandatory retirement age went up from 60 to 65.  That helped delay the shortage for a few years.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 06, 2017, 03:00:11 PM
Last time I looked into it, it looked like a bad wager unless you're a military pilot. Starting pay isn't great, building hours on your own dime is expensive and you're always once bounced physical away from the unemployment line. Virtually no airlines last I looked had training programs, relying on the mil pipeline. So, it's entirely possible to get an insanely huge amount of debt and then be downchecked at any second due to high blood pressure or whatnot. I doubt you'd get a refund on all that debt and flight hours.

Bob hit the nail on the head.



Yes, training is expensive, but a person only needs to pay for the first 250-300 hours.  After that, companies will pay you if you can get hired.  That 250 hours can be done in a year if you put your mind to it.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: KD5NRH on February 06, 2017, 03:31:42 PM
Downsizing and drones.

There's an idea; we'll just have groups of remote pilots at each airport to handle takeoffs and landings, and the majority of the flight can be fully automated.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: BobR on February 06, 2017, 03:47:20 PM
^^^^

If it wasn't for the perceived reluctance of the flying public to fly without a pilot this could have already been put in place. ;)

bob
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Ben on February 06, 2017, 04:23:53 PM
No.  The mandatory retirement age went up from 60 to 65.  That helped delay the shortage for a few years.
Ah, okay. I got it bass akwards as usual. :)
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: zahc on February 06, 2017, 04:29:52 PM
The airlines created their bed let them lie in it

qft; applies to many industries and organizations that forget or take for granted the human capital that keeps them running.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Boomhauer on February 06, 2017, 04:50:19 PM
250 hours at $140 an hour = $35000. Quite a steep outlay.

And that's prolly low considering that's a single engine price.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: AmbulanceDriver on February 06, 2017, 06:11:06 PM
Kinda funny...  I was reading something online (can't remember what now) and there was a yuuuuuge ad for Horizon, offering a $10,000 recruitment bonus for pilot candidates.   And then come here and find this....
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: RoadKingLarry on February 06, 2017, 07:02:40 PM
I can see it now. H1B visas for pilots.

Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 06, 2017, 09:50:22 PM
250 hours at $140 an hour = $35000. Quite a steep outlay.

And that's prolly low considering that's a single engine price.

Probably more like $70,000.  Yeah it is expensive.  Is it more expensive than a college degree?  Depends on the degree, but most degrees don't give a person specialized training.

$70k is in the price area of a nice new car.  How long do people keep their cars these days?

Most regionals are paying close to $50k in salary and bonuses for new hire pilots.  That is a pretty quick ROI.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: MechAg94 on February 06, 2017, 10:22:29 PM
$70K is a luxury car, not just a nice car.  Most people don't spend near that much for nice cars.

Starting pay for process operators at chemical plants is near that same pay.  Certainly gets higher than that with experience.  What is the top end for airline pilots with say 10 years experience?  Just curious where you can go from there. 

I used to know an engineer who worked for my company.  He took a job with Boeing and moved to Seattle.  Last time I talked to him, he had quit that (not many nice things to say about Boeing).  He was in town to get simulator hours to train to be an airline pilot.  I lost track of him since then. 
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: sumpnz on February 07, 2017, 12:24:13 AM
At the end of the day I'm kind of glad I didn't go the commercial pilot route and did engineering instead.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Jamisjockey on February 07, 2017, 08:52:35 AM
I can see it now. H1B visas for pilots.



I talk to pilots all day long, and an increasing number of them have various accents. 
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: KD5NRH on February 07, 2017, 10:07:07 AM
$70K is a luxury car, not just a nice car.

Or 100-130 of my last few cars.  (Not necessarily a bad idea; I could then handle it like a New York reload whenever something breaks.  New York repair job?)
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 07, 2017, 10:53:42 AM
What is the top end for airline pilots with say 10 years experience?  Just curious where you can go from there. 

About $220k/yr for a captain and around $150k for FOs depending on equipment.  Most airline pay scales top out at 12 years, but there are still COLA raises after that.

One thing you might not realize is that $220k/yr is based on roughly 15 days/month of work. 
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 07, 2017, 10:54:09 AM
I talk to pilots all day long, and an increasing number of them have various accents. 

Same thing for controllers.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: HankB on February 07, 2017, 12:03:51 PM
About $220k/yr for a captain and around $150k for FOs depending on equipment.  Most airline pay scales top out at 12 years, but there are still COLA raises after that.

One thing you might not realize is that $220k/yr is based on roughly 15 days/month of work. 
Is that for the guys flying jumbo jets on international routes?
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: BobR on February 07, 2017, 12:10:38 PM
Same thing for controllers.

As long as they are speaking understandable English that is a bonus. I remember the first time we flew into Djibouti, what a cluster that was. We may as well have had total radio failure for the quality of communication we had going on. :(

bob
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: KD5NRH on February 07, 2017, 01:20:08 PM
Is that for the guys flying jumbo jets on international routes?

What's the going rate for washouts in poorly maintained G-21s?
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 07, 2017, 01:30:36 PM
Is that for the guys flying jumbo jets on international routes?

Domestic A320 captains for a US carrier.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 07, 2017, 01:31:00 PM
What's the going rate for washouts in poorly maintained G-21s?

Tree fiddy.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: KD5NRH on February 07, 2017, 02:54:56 PM
Tree fiddy.

I just need a G-21, a drunk mechanic and a hot on-and-off girlfriend, then.

Oh, yeah, and to go back and finish the license someday.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fitz on February 10, 2017, 12:02:32 AM
honestly, i'm considering a career change. either moving into development or flying.

I passed my private checkride in mid November at 42 hours. I'm now at about 100 hours. I wish I had done this a decade ago.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: dogmush on February 10, 2017, 01:53:29 AM
In interesting timing, this was in Stars and Stripes when I cam down this morning.:

https://www.stripes.com/air-force-chief-seeks-to-lower-commercial-flight-hour-requirement-1.452920


Apparently the Air Force is also feeling the squeeze.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 10, 2017, 07:16:34 AM
In interesting timing, this was in Stars and Stripes when I cam down this morning.:

https://www.stripes.com/air-force-chief-seeks-to-lower-commercial-flight-hour-requirement-1.452920


Apparently the Air Force is also feeling the squeeze.

I'm sure they are, but that headline is exactly backwards.  The AF Chief wants to raise the commercial hiring minimums so he can hang on to his pilots longer.

The headline: Air Force chief seeks to lower commercial flight-hour requirement

The body: The Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 was signed into law after the 2009 crash of Colgan Air Flight 3407 in Buffalo, N.Y. Pilot error and insufficient airline safety procedures were identified as factors. The subsequent legislation addressed safety of flight, including raising the number of hours from 250 to 1,500 that a non-military pilot must have before being hired by a commercial airline. Military-trained pilots are required to have 750 hours.

The military felt the impact of the rule change. Getting 1,500 hours of flight can be prohibitively expensive for non-military pilots, whereas military pilots can rapidly obtain the hours required. Those active-duty pilots are often lured to leave the military by the commercial sector, Goldfein said.

To get hired at a FAA part 121 airline (commercial airlines) a person needs a minimum of 1,500 hours.  But to get hired at a part 135 (smaller planes, air-taxi, corporate, etc) only requires 250.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: dogmush on February 10, 2017, 07:56:25 AM
Quote
To get hired at a FAA part 121 airline (commercial airlines) a person needs a minimum of 1,500 hours.  But to get hired at a part 135 (smaller planes, air-taxi, corporate, etc) only requires 250.

My understanding of the article is that the Air Force Chief would like to lower that number to whatever it was pre 2010, so that more civilian pilots can get started and more military pilots will stay in the Air Force.
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fitz on February 10, 2017, 08:18:56 AM
What's ironic is the Air Force doesn't seem to be aware of the reasons people are getting out

Friend of mine who is about to pin major and is a c-130 pilot says

"Why would i stay in when I can take my 2000 hours in a c130 and go make more money with less bullshit"


The military is blissfully unaware, as a whole, of the real reasons for its talent drain
Title: Re: We still need pilots.
Post by: Fly320s on February 10, 2017, 10:00:19 AM
My understanding of the article is that the Air Force Chief would like to lower that number to whatever it was pre 2010, so that more civilian pilots can get started and more military pilots will stay in the Air Force.

That makes sense, but it doesn't work.  Even back then it was about a 1:1 ratio of civilian to military pilots getting hired.  I think it has more to do with the state of the airline industry than the hiring mins.  Job markets suck?  Stay in the military.  Every airline is hiring?  Leave the military and enjoy the good life.