Armed Polite Society

Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: K Frame on March 20, 2017, 09:32:52 AM

Title: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 20, 2017, 09:32:52 AM
Or did I miss one?

Here's an interesting article on the man behind the nominee...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gorsuch-seen-many-smart-modest-nominee-high-court-071150705.html


The biggest reason why I think Gorsuch would be a spectacular candidate for the high court?

Because the socialist-quickly-moving-to-communist who represents my Congressional district, Gerry Connolly, is adamantly opposed to him, claiming that he will be a "revisionist voice" on the court.

I just about choked to death laughing when I read that...



eta:  his name is spelled "Gorsuch"
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: MechAg94 on March 20, 2017, 12:30:17 PM
I like what I hear about him and that the usual suspect seem to hate his guts.  It appears McConnell will have to use the Nuke Option to get him confirmed so I don't know how quickly that will happen.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 20, 2017, 12:36:40 PM
The nuke option is what I'm afraid of.

I REALLY hope that it doesn't come to that and enough Democrats break ranks to get him confirmed, primarily because it would really show how fractured and chaotic the Democratic party is despite all the tub thumping about unity.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on March 20, 2017, 12:39:29 PM
Agreed.  I can often tell much about a person by who they offend and make enemies of...
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Hawkmoon on March 20, 2017, 04:14:13 PM
The nuke option is what I'm afraid of.

I REALLY hope that it doesn't come to that and enough Democrats break ranks to get him confirmed, primarily because it would really show how fractured and chaotic the Democratic party is despite all the tub thumping about unity.

Why are you opposed to the nuke option? The entire concept of the filibuster is something that should never have been created and should not be allowed. It ranks right up there with "poison pill" amendments to bills. In a sane world, with sane legislators, anything worthy of being proposed as a law should be discussed and voted on in its own right, not subjected to gamesmanship and "parliamentary tactics." The same applies to nominations.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: MechAg94 on March 20, 2017, 04:15:30 PM
Agreed.  I can often tell much about a person by who they offend and make enemies of...
With all the media misinformation and misdirection these days, that is a good indicator to use.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 21, 2017, 07:11:53 AM
"Why are you opposed to the nuke option?"


I never said I was opposed to the nuke option, I said I would rather not see it come to that. There is a substantial difference between the two.



Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Monkeyleg on March 21, 2017, 09:32:06 AM
There were many Democrats yesterday who said good things about Gorsuch. When it comes time to vote, though, they'll fall into lockstep with their leadership and go thumbs down.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 21, 2017, 09:57:01 AM
Apparently Diane Feinstein expressed her grave worries that any judge would hold to the law, instead of taking the opportunity to create law, doesn't give a flying three fingered *expletive deleted*ck for the people who would be affected by Constitutional adherence.

I guess Diane is a member of the "Judges should be legislators" camp.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on March 21, 2017, 11:25:41 AM
Apparently Diane Feinstein expressed her grave worries that any judge would hold to the law, instead of taking the opportunity to create law, doesn't give a flying three fingered *expletive deleted*ck for the people who would be affected by Constitutional adherence.

I guess Diane is a member of the "Judges should be legislators" camp.

Man, she is really harping on the 2nd. She is obviously attempting to equate civilian rifles with M16s. Also, "the 2nd Amendment has clearly been shown to be ambiguous".
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on March 21, 2017, 11:29:43 AM
Also, Gorsuch is freakin' sharp as a surgical scalpel. He's making all those senators look like the second string on the 8th grade debate team.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 21, 2017, 12:03:09 PM
I'd love to be watching the hearings, but given where I work, it's probably not such a great idea to stream them.

Feinstein's comment about the second amendment is a perfect example of her hypocrisy.


I'm reading the live blog over at Fox News and apparently the Dems are still losing their freaking minds over Garland's "stolen" seat. Graham apparently had to remind them once again that the esteemed Joe Biden himself pushed his colleagues not to confirm a nominee in the last year of a President's term.

Isn't it amazing how butthurt and forgetful the Dems can get when their own plans are turned against them?

Why, you HAVE to approve Garland! Anything else would be stealing his seat!

Why, you CAN'T impose the Harry Reid rule to neutralize us! That would be horrible and unfair!
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 21, 2017, 12:13:20 PM
And here's the money quote on why Diane Feinstein finds Neil Gorsuch so dangerous to her vision of America...

"My job isn't to write the laws. It's to apply the laws."

Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: TommyGunn on March 21, 2017, 12:18:19 PM
And here's the money quote on why Diane Feinstein finds Neil Gorsuch so dangerous to her vision of America...

"My job isn't to write the laws. It's to apply the laws."


!
I saw a video clip of Feinstein explaining that she doesn't like "originalists" because they won't twist the plain meaning of the words of the Constitution & B.O.R.s into something more modern,  because you know ... SLAVERY!  And other evil things of our founding!   
I found it a very disturbing video .... not that it revealed anything about Diane Feinstein I didn't really know, I was just stunned she'd be so open about her disdain for those who feel the founders meant what they said.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on March 21, 2017, 12:26:23 PM

!
I saw a video clip of Feinstein explaining that she doesn't like "originalists" because they won't twist the plain meaning of the words of the Constitution & B.O.R.s into something more modern,  because you know ... SLAVERY!  And other evil things of our founding!   
I found it a very disturbing video .... not that it revealed anything about Diane Feinstein I didn't really know, I was just stunned she'd be so open about her disdain for those who feel the founders meant what they said.


On the flip side, she asked Gorsuch a question about GPS trackers on vehicles (I've only been watching on and off, so am not sure what side she is on). Gorsuch went up even higher in my book, because (tying in the "originalist" thing) he talked about going back to the constitution and supporting documents as written, and found that the Founders covered that pre the technology, because they already stated their opinion regarding one party's property trespassing on another party's property.

I thought it was an excellent reference to how being an originalist still works, and works well, in modern times. It also seems he made an excellent logical example of how that could tie into something like modern arms as well.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 21, 2017, 12:36:08 PM

!
I saw a video clip of Feinstein explaining that she doesn't like "originalists" because they won't twist the plain meaning of the words of the Constitution & B.O.R.s into something more modern,  because you know ... SLAVERY!  And other evil things of our founding!  
I found it a very disturbing video .... not that it revealed anything about Diane Feinstein I didn't really know, I was just stunned she'd be so open about her disdain for those who feel the founders meant what they said.


Yep, that's what I was getting at in reply 8. She wants activist judges, because the Framers were just a bunch of wimming hating, racist, richy rich rich white men who wanted to grab some pussy...

In other words, the Framers were ALL Donald Trump.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: zxcvbob on March 21, 2017, 12:55:09 PM
Yep, that's what I was getting at in reply 8. She wants activist judges, because the Framers were just a bunch of wimming hating, racist, richy rich rich white men who wanted to grab some pussy...

In other words, the Framers were ALL Donald Trump.

Can you imagine Ben Franklin with a Twitter account?  ==(8-0
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on March 21, 2017, 03:38:47 PM
Can you imagine Ben Franklin with a Twitter account?  ==(8-0

The king would have had him thrown in the Tower of London for his Twitter feed. 

IIRC, he really was grabbing pu**y during his times in London and especially Paris...  :cool: :cool:
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on March 21, 2017, 04:28:45 PM
Ha ha - one of the "negatives" about being an originalist regarding the 2nd is that there were no handguns in the 18th century:

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/03/21/could-cosmos-attempted-takedown-of-gorsuch-be-more-pathetic-you-be-the-judge/
Title: Re:
Post by: K Frame on March 21, 2017, 04:45:46 PM
It's ok! She saved it! She edited the piece!

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on March 21, 2017, 04:51:36 PM
Gorsuch's fileting of Dick Durbin was masterful....
Title: Re:
Post by: Ben on March 21, 2017, 05:07:54 PM
It's ok! She saved it! She edited the piece!

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

What I don't understand from a post of hers the other day is that she's married. Who in their right mind? She's gotta be a 24/7 nagger. Seems like that would get on the nerves of even a "woke" liberal.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on March 21, 2017, 05:10:25 PM
Gorsuch's fileting of Dick Durbin was masterful....

I was just watching another one of Franken's question (AKA lecture) sessions. I'm now pretty sure that he's mentally retarded.

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/03/21/doggone-it-al-franken-beclowns-himself-over-gorsuch-for-the-second-day-in-a-row/

Example:

Quote
@AlFranken complains Gorsuch worked on campaigns dating back to '76. Gorsuch was 9 and his dad was a politician. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Gorsuch …
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Jim147 on March 21, 2017, 05:42:22 PM
It's Minnesota's fault.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: TommyGunn on March 21, 2017, 07:22:23 PM
Ha ha - one of the "negatives" about being an originalist regarding the 2nd is that there were no handguns in the 18th century:

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/03/21/could-cosmos-attempted-takedown-of-gorsuch-be-more-pathetic-you-be-the-judge/

She never saw a decent pair of dueling pistols?   Holy Aaron Burr, Batman!
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on March 21, 2017, 09:59:20 PM
Ted Cruz is enjoying the hearings far too much.   including the creation of a new meme:

https://twitter.com/petridishes/status/844272531687333890/photo/1


And discussing THHGTTG:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/ted-cruz-and-neil-gorsuch-discuss-hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-at-senate-hearing/
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: DustinD on March 21, 2017, 10:16:12 PM
Those two need to be on the Court together.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 22, 2017, 09:52:28 AM
I was just watching another one of Franken's question (AKA lecture) sessions. I'm now pretty sure that he's mentally retarded.



There's doubt?
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: TommyGunn on March 22, 2017, 10:56:16 AM
I was just watching another one of Franken's question (AKA lecture) sessions. I'm now pretty sure that he's mentally retarded  deranged.  

FIFY..  Well, IMO "deranged" is technically more accurate .... [popcorn]
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Monkeyleg on March 23, 2017, 02:58:43 PM
Annnnndddd Schumer is saying the Dem's will filibuster. Funny how he didn't do that in 2005 when Gorsuch was appointed to a federal court.

Time for McConnell to use the nuclear option. This stonewalling has to stop. Gorsuch is a Boy Scout.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: makattak on March 23, 2017, 03:17:00 PM
Time for McConnell to use the nuclear option. This stonewalling has to stop. Gorsuch is a Boy Scout.

I don't think so, because I'm pretty sure he's neither gay or transgender. The identity obsessed Dems would have a really tough time opposing him.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on March 23, 2017, 03:30:57 PM
Is he not qualified ??

Has not shown to be a diligent judge and lawyer, with a firm grasp of what will be expected of him as USSC Justice ??


So why are they filibustering him?
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on March 23, 2017, 03:37:48 PM
Yano, I did go back and look at Trump's "Shortlist" of possible USSC picks he posted before the election....Guess who is NOT on it.
http://www.thewrap.com/donald-trump-releases-list-of-11-potential-supreme-court-justice-nominees/


If you said Neil Gorsuch, give yourself a cookie.


So, let the howling from all sides begin.... "LOOK He LIED to Everyone !!!!!!"

 ;/ ;/ ;/ ;/ ;/
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Angel Eyes on March 23, 2017, 03:38:33 PM
So why are they filibustering him?

Because they're still butthurt over Garland.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on March 23, 2017, 04:09:38 PM
Because they're still butthurt over Garland.


Which they should take out on Joe Biden.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on March 23, 2017, 04:17:29 PM
"why are they filibustering him?"

Because he didn't come out as a gay, anti-gun, pro-abortion on demand, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-single payer healthcare, anti-death penalty Latino Asian African American transgender Xe.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Angel Eyes on March 23, 2017, 04:34:14 PM
Nuclear option, here we come.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on March 23, 2017, 04:42:51 PM
I guess it's too late to paint him as a "wise latinia" ??
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: BobR on March 23, 2017, 05:07:08 PM
Yano, I did go back and look at Trump's "Shortlist" of possible USSC picks he posted before the election....Guess who is NOT on it.
http://www.thewrap.com/donald-trump-releases-list-of-11-potential-supreme-court-justice-nominees/


If you said Neil Gorsuch, give yourself a cookie.


So, let the howling from all sides begin.... "LOOK He LIED to Everyone !!!!!!"

 ;/ ;/ ;/ ;/ ;/

Neil Gorsuch was on the list of 21 that Trump put forward. This is the first I heard of a list of 11.  =|

bob
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: KD5NRH on March 23, 2017, 05:31:12 PM
She never saw a decent pair of dueling pistols?   Holy Aaron Burr, Batman!

Not just dueling, but IIRC, some with the frizzen made to close the pan well enough for all-day, even concealed carry, needing only to be cocked and fired.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 03, 2017, 01:57:10 PM
http://thefederalist.com/2017/04/03/democrats-applying-litmus-tests-gorsuch-favorite-justices-wouldnt-pass/

Quote
Since Gorsuch’s nomination, Democratic senators have been imposing the same litmus tests Hillary Clinton announced during last year’s presidential campaign...

...even members of the Roe Supreme Court, including modern liberal champions William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, would fail still another litmus test: A mere three months before announcing the abortion decision, the Supreme Court summarily rejected the claim of a same-sex couple that the Constitution gave them a right to marry, declining to take seriously the argument that would become law in Obergefell.

All of this highlights a problem with the ever-changing interpretation of the Constitution Senate Democrats promote: It imposes litmus tests nearly every justice who is not currently serving would fail, from the giants of the more distant past to recent liberal heroes. That’s not a compelling standard for an institution whose rulings are supposed to stand the test of time.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on April 03, 2017, 07:48:19 PM
I keep reading that Chuck U. Schumer has chosen to die on the 60 vote/filibuster hill on Friday.


 [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn]
Title: Re: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: makattak on April 03, 2017, 07:57:06 PM
I keep reading that Chuck U. Schumer has chosen to die on the 60 vote/filibuster hill on Friday.


 [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn]
It'll all come down to (checks rules about disparaging nicknames)... Senators Graham, McCain, and Collins.

I'm more than certain they will preserve the Democrats ability to filibuster Supreme Court nominations.  (The Republicans don't have that ability.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: makattak on April 04, 2017, 10:53:41 AM
It'll all come down to (checks rules about disparaging nicknames)... Senators Graham, McCain, and Collins.

I'm more than certain they will preserve the Democrats ability to filibuster Supreme Court nominations.  (The Republicans don't have that ability.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-gorsuch-mccain-idUSKBN1752GS

I'm honestly surprised the esteemed Senator from Arizona is able to see that the former decorum of the Senate is gone and is able to realize that the Reid Option is now necessary.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on April 04, 2017, 04:20:15 PM
 =D

http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2017/04/04/no-matter-whos-in-power-these-reid-and-schumer-flashbacks-from-2013-mean-its-game-over-for-dems-on-gorsuch/
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on April 04, 2017, 05:49:08 PM
More funny stuff from Schumer. Apparently failed humor is a family trait. :)

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/04/04/thats-cute-chuck-now-schumer-wants-to-compromise-with-gop-on-scotus/
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: 230RN on April 04, 2017, 05:55:20 PM
"why are they filibustering him?"

Because he didn't come out as a gay, anti-gun, pro-abortion on demand, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-single payer healthcare, anti-death penalty Latino Asian African American transgender Xe.

You forgot Latina Wise Woman.

Ooops, Scout 26 already brought that up.  Missed it somehow.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Angel Eyes on April 04, 2017, 06:09:39 PM
More funny stuff from Schumer. Apparently failed humor is a family trait. :)

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/04/04/thats-cute-chuck-now-schumer-wants-to-compromise-with-gop-on-scotus/

Quote
   That's not how it works. https://t.co/3oI6rqziB0

    — Senator Hatch Office (@senorrinhatch) April 4, 2017

 :lol:
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: 230RN on April 05, 2017, 03:13:29 PM
FYI
I just got a robocall urging me to call my Senators to tell them not to allow a "partisan" change in the rules that would disallow a filibuster, although they did not use that word.  They merely suggested that it would prevent "Trump's nominee" from being confirmed.

Yes, I'm registered as a Democrat  --I find that quite handy sometimes, despite the fact that a number of years ago I disaffiliated myself from most of their philosophy.  I've mentioned this before.

It seems like they are pulling out all the stops in their attempts to "blockade" the red States.

As if that weren't obvious by now.

The call could have been to all voters, but judging from the other robocalls I've been getting since before the election, I doubt it.

Terry
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Ben on April 05, 2017, 04:54:01 PM
I like Rand Paul's suggestion that we need to stop calling it the nuclear option and start calling it the Reid option.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: DittoHead on April 05, 2017, 05:13:24 PM
I don't really care what they call it, Gorsuch is clearly qualified and should be confirmed ASAP.
Rules are rules, and if those rules allow the majority to rewrite the rules (which they apparently do) then I don't really see the issue.
I'm honestly surprised it took this long to "nuke it".
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 06, 2017, 01:19:47 PM
Mr Reid's rule has now been applied. When do they swear in our new milk-chugging Reichsjustice?  :rofl:
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: zxcvbob on April 06, 2017, 02:14:46 PM
Let's say hypothetically that Clinton had won the election.  Would the Senate Democrats have pitched the same hissy-fit if she had nominated anyone other than Merrick Garland?

Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on April 06, 2017, 03:07:57 PM
I like Rand Paul's suggestion that we need to stop calling it the nuclear option and start calling it the Reid option.

I've been saying for a couple of months that the Republicans are eventually going to erect a statue to Harry Reid.


What's really interesting is that 4 senators voted to break the filibuster -- Heitcamp, Donnolly, Manchin, and Bennett.

3 of the 4 are from states that went Trump and who are also up for re-election in 2018. Easy to see what their motivation was -- self-preservations.

The fourth, Bennett of Colorado, is from a Hillary state and is NOT up for re-election. I want to see what the Denver Post has to say about his position.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: wmenorr67 on April 06, 2017, 03:31:48 PM
Bennett changed his vote later.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 06, 2017, 03:35:31 PM
Bennett changed his vote later.


He was for Satan Incarnate, before he was against him.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on April 06, 2017, 03:38:57 PM
Bennett changed his vote later.

Explain. Changed it how? When?
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: wmenorr67 on April 06, 2017, 04:07:56 PM
Explain. Changed it how? When?

Quote
This was after Democrats initially blocked Gorsuch in a filibuster earlier in the day. Four Democrats broke ranks -- Sens. Michael Bennet, D-Colo.; Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D.; Joe Donnelly, D-Ind.; and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. – but Republicans still fell short of the 60 votes needed to proceed, prompting McConnell to overhaul the way the Senate works.

He said he did so “for the sake of our country.”

Bennet later opposed Gorsuch on the do-over vote.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/06/republicans-go-nuclear-bust-through-democratic-filibuster-on-gorsuch.html
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Scout26 on April 06, 2017, 04:12:56 PM
Explain. Changed it how? When?

There was a series of votes.

For Cloture.

To change the rules to 50 votes.

For Cloture again under the new rules.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Hawkmoon on April 06, 2017, 06:37:26 PM
So the elimination of the 60-vote requirement wasn't for the actual confirmation vote, but only for the number of votes needed to end a filibuster?
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 06, 2017, 06:48:26 PM
Reports say Gorsuch will be sworn in on Monday or Tuesday. I hope that guy/woman/person is there to do his Anakin NOOOOOO! again.  :laugh:

I wonder how long until Gorsuch gets out the head ax, and starts eliminating teh ghays. Will he formally enslave all the women, or merely declare them non-persons?
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Monkeyleg on April 06, 2017, 07:31:31 PM
Will he formally enslave all the women, or merely declare them non-persons?

Is Gorsuch a Muslim?
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 06, 2017, 07:46:50 PM
Is Gorsuch a Muslim?


Worse. He's an originalist!

(https://armedpolitesociety.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.business2community.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F02%2FFake-Gorsuch-quote.jpg&hash=7f0fed02e92335241a2655f61e3de53e578e0a6a)

(https://cdn.meme.am/instances/400x400/69352336.jpg)
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: MechAg94 on April 06, 2017, 09:31:36 PM
So the elimination of the 60-vote requirement wasn't for the actual confirmation vote, but only for the number of votes needed to end a filibuster?
That is my understanding.  It just allows a vote to end debate which brings on the floor vote for confirmation. 

Rush mentioned today that SC nominees were never filibustered until Democrats started doing it under Bush II.  I hadn't heard that mentioned anywhere.  He said even Clarence Thomas got confirmed with less than 60 votes even after the circus that went out around the Anita Hill stuff. 
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: 230RN on April 07, 2017, 04:19:04 AM
Regarding my previous remark about it being handy to register as a Democrat, it was nice to be able to start out my email to my Democratic Senator with "As a long-standing registered Democrat..."

"...I urge you to break ranks with the Party..."

Terry
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on April 07, 2017, 07:25:25 AM
There was a series of votes.

For Cloture.

To change the rules to 50 votes.

For Cloture again under the new rules.


Yeah, I missed that Fox was reporting on a series of votes.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on April 07, 2017, 07:28:59 AM
After the cloture vote, the Dems were told that there would be 30 more hours for people to address their concerns on the Senate floor, and a vote would be held Friday (today) at 7:30 p.m.

Well, the Dems, who have vowed to fight this nomination until the last possible minute, suddenly realized that hey, 7:30 p.m. is too late for us to make our Easter recess flights.

So they requested that the vote be moved to 11:30 this morning.

Fighting the good fight is a Democratic way of life... as long as it doesn't interfere with their vacations.


Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: wmenorr67 on April 07, 2017, 08:49:09 AM
After the cloture vote, the Dems were told that there would be 30 more hours for people to address their concerns on the Senate floor, and a vote would be held Friday (today) at 7:30 p.m.

Well, the Dems, who have vowed to fight this nomination until the last possible minute, suddenly realized that hey, 7:30 p.m. is too late for us to make our Easter recess flights.

So they requested that the vote be moved to 11:30 this morning.

Fighting the good fight is a Democratic way of life... as long as it doesn't interfere with their vacations.


McConnell should say, nope the vote is scheduled for 7:30 because we have other pressing business to attend to during the day.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on April 07, 2017, 09:10:59 AM
McConnell should say, nope the vote is scheduled for 7:30 because we have other pressing business to attend to during the day.

Yeah, I'd love it, but you know that the Republicans were bitching about missing flights, too.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 07, 2017, 01:04:22 PM
Epic series of replies to Takei's Twitterubbish.

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/04/06/legal-expert-george-takei-weighs-in-on-illegitimate-justice-neil-gorsuch/

 :rofl:
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: TommyGunn on April 07, 2017, 01:11:16 PM
Epic series of replies to Takei's Twitterubbish.y

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/04/06/legal-expert-george-takei-weighs-in-on-illegitimate-justice-neil-gorsuch/

 :rofl:


Takei is getting old..or perhaps has swallowed too much Romulan Ale. [popcorn].
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on April 07, 2017, 01:14:47 PM
Epic series of replies to Takei's Twitterubbish.

http://twitchy.com/sd-3133/2017/04/06/legal-expert-george-takei-weighs-in-on-illegitimate-justice-neil-gorsuch/

 :rofl:

That's EPIC!
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Hawkmoon on April 07, 2017, 01:23:57 PM
Gotta luv it.

Quote
Gorsuch will be an illegitimate justice named by an illegitimate president. If Trump colluded with Russia, his appointments won't count.

So, "Not our President" has now morphed into "Not our Justice." I can hardly wait to find out what the Dems' next "Not our ... " will be.  [popcorn]
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: K Frame on April 07, 2017, 01:38:22 PM
With any hope it will be "Not our Country" and the stupid *expletive deleted*s will all move to Canada. Like they threatened to do, but lied about.
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 07, 2017, 02:08:34 PM
My favorite part is when he tells him to grab some Chick-Fil-A.  :lol:
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: 230RN on April 07, 2017, 02:53:53 PM
I just got an e-mail back from Sen. Gardner:

___________________________
Thank you for contacting me regarding the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. I appreciate you taking the time to write. It is an honor to serve you in the United States Senate and I hope you will continue to write with your thoughts and ideas on moving our country forward.

On April 7, 2017, with my support, the Senate voted to confirm Judge Gorsuch as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Gorsuch, a fourth-generation Coloradan and Boulder resident, previously served on the Tenth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.

Colorado’s Neil Gorsuch is an exceptional choice to serve on the Supreme Court, and I was honored to cast my vote for him. Throughout the confirmation process, I urged my colleagues to support this supremely qualified, mainstream jurist who will serve our country well. Neil Gorsuch has a deep understanding of Western issues and future generations of Coloradans will benefit from his service to our country. Both Democrats and Republicans in Colorado who know Gorsuch best supported his confirmation to the Court. They have praised Gorsuch as one of the brightest legal minds in the country and have seen the thoughtful approach he took while serving on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. It is a proud day for Colorado and the United States has much to look forward to with Neil Gorsuch serving on the Supreme Court.

Again, thank you for contacting me, and do not hesitate to do so again when an issue is important to you.
____________________

But it's  only 12:50 PM MST.

So Gorsuch is in... so early in the day?

Did they make their plane departures?

Will Sonny finally marry Jane even though he's not the father?  Does Jane know that Sonny knows he's not the father?

At some point I'll thank Senator Gardner, but mention I don't think we should "move forward" any closer to the cliff.  I liked the term "mainstream jurist."

Terry

Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: RoadKingLarry on April 07, 2017, 06:28:29 PM

Takei is getting old..or perhaps has swallowed too much Romulan Ale. [popcorn].

"Romulan Ale"? Is that what the cool gay kids are calling it now?
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: TommyGunn on April 07, 2017, 07:18:32 PM
"Romulan Ale"? Is that what the cool gay kids are calling it now?


A reference from "STAR TREK II ;  THE WRATH OF KHAN."   
Title: Re: No posts about the Gorsuch hearings kicking off today?
Post by: Perd Hapley on April 13, 2017, 04:26:23 PM
One more note on Justice Gorsuch, because it's some pretty tasty snark.

Quote
This anti-constitutional and anti-law approach to the judiciary is often dressed up as a defending the weak (such as Planned Parenthood) and standing up to powerful oppressors (such as the Little Sisters of the Poor).

https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2017/04/we-should-all-be-grateful-for-gorsuch