Armed Polite Society
Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: gunsmith on July 31, 2017, 06:52:07 PM
-
I just got this, and i have no idea what Imran or Seth Rich looks like.
Imran Awan is in custody over the wasserman IT scandal .... soooo...
Is this photo real? photoshopped?
You guys are experts... ( compared to me lol )
http://www.puppetstringnews.com/blog/imran-awan-went-to-bar-with-seth-rich-day-he-was-killed
-
From everything I've read it's true ... they were at an IT party before the bar where that photo was taken ... Perhaps Awan decided to cash in and handle the DNC's 'wet work' by himself ... a professional hitman should have known to at least take his watch, cell phone or wallet ... I wonder what it will take to get to the bottom of this ... the missing hours from when Rich left the bar to when he got shot are what I'm curious about ...
[popcorn]
Rich is seated Awan is standing ... http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07/report-seth-rich-attended-party-numerous-dc-workers-night-murdered/
-
Hey Look Over There !!! Russia !!!11
[popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn] [popcorn]
I have a fervent hope that Mueller will burrow to the bottom of this rabbit hole and send the entire DNC to the pokey.
-
Hey Look Over There !!! Russia !!!11
Funny you should mention that...
The same crazy guy who really got the Seth Rich conspiracy going is now suing Fox News over it and saying that it was done specifically as a distraction from Russia.
Wheeler alleges Fox News and the Trump supporter intended to deflect public attention from growing concern about the administration's ties to the Russian government. His suit charges that a Fox News reporter created quotations out of thin air and attributed them to him to propel her story...
"Rod Wheeler unfortunately was used as a pawn by Ed Butowsky, Fox News and the Trump administration to try and steer away the attention that was being given about the Russian hacking of the DNC emails," says Douglas Wigdor, Wheeler's lawyer.
Whether Wheeler can be believed about anything seems pretty debatable at this point.
-
Okay, let's think about the "Russia, Russia, Russia" thing.
Let's say that Putin had the DNC hacked and got the emails. He's a KGB guy, does anyone REALLY think he looked at the Polling and Projections and said "Boris, it looks like Hillary is slam dunk to become President. Give all the take to Wikileaks so we can help The Donald."
Or as a KGB guy, would he say:
"Boris, pick out some of the second or third tier stuff, things that are embarrassing but not to really good stuff. Enough, so that when I meet with President Clinton, I can show her some of what we have, and I will own her."
Really ?!?!
I have yet to hear:
1) What law(s) were broken.
2) Exactly what the "interference" was. Some "fake news" on sketchy "news" sights ?? RT? No one denies that the DNC emails are not real. No one says that any voting machines were hacked or tampered with. I think Jill Stein's "recount" proved that. The only places with even a whiff of voter fraud are the usual places...Chicago, Philly, California.
And the 17 intelligence agencies that claimed the unspecified "Interference" is now down to 4, and the interference is still unspecified. Unless outing Hillary and the DNC as disliked, lying, cheating, immoral, scumbags, is "Interference".