Armed Polite Society
Main Forums => Politics => Topic started by: WLJ on July 03, 2020, 09:39:38 AM
-
You're guilty of "sexual racism"
What's next? If you don't eat at least one black colored food everyday you're racist?
If you prefer vanilla ice cream over chocolate?
OMG! I have white blood cells! Kill me!
Sexual racism is racism. If you're white & you find yourself writing off an entire ethnic group from your dating or sex life because you can't imagine finding them attractive, recognise this as a learnt behaviour which originates in white supremacy. Here's some more info: (1/2) pic.twitter.com/bUCrFoO2Wg
— Alexander Leon (@alexand_erleon) July 1, 2020
– no, it's not comparable to other sexual preferences which are either innate (gender) or don't uphold a system of structural oppression (height)
– no, it's not racism if POC exclude white people from their sex lives (this is often done to protect from racism) pic.twitter.com/cmslFz30ZU
— Alexander Leon (@alexand_erleon) July 1, 2020
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2020/07/02/writer-explains-that-its-not-sexual-racism-for-people-of-color-to-exclude-white-people-from-their-sex-lives/
-
You know white bloods cells are basically the police of you body. :O
-
Is there anything left to add to the "You're a racist if.." list?
-
Oh, if I was an opportunistic black guy I would for sure be hanging out at these riots in white college towns. Gotta prove that BLM schtick sweetie.
-
"A system of structural oppression (height)" ? So it is OK to not screw someone because of their height?
-
I also disagree that there's not structural "selection" or prejudice based on height (I wouldn't call it oppression, because because oppression is an actual real thing and not everything bad is oppression). Race and height are similar in my opinion, except that height does confer concrete advantages in some ways, while (current orthodoxy says that) race is purely appearance.
There are un-ignorable statistical anomalies in achievement based on height. CEOs are demonstrably taller than the general population, by a factor far too large to be chance. So, if short CEOs are practically non-existent, is that the fault of the short CEOs, or are there social factors that conspire against them? Should we have initiatives and laws to try to get more representation by short people into leadership positions? Unlike race, from what I see it doesn't seem like anyone cares much about the plight of short people. Not to mention that women are statistically far shorter than men, so biology itself is very sexist here. So discrimination based on height is probably just as active, and creates just as much difference in our society as discrimination based on race. Nobody seems to talk about it though, even though one's height is just as much out of their control as their race, and even though it doesn't matter to performance in the vast majority of jobs.
So instead of pointing out that sexual discrimination (which I will continue to engage in enthusiastically and without apology) based on race is worse than based on height, I would say it's just about the same thing, because when it comes to propogation of the species, people are going to discriminate based on physical factors and that's just the way it is.
-
Alan Harper askes his date,"So how tall are you, really?"
She replies, "Five foot thirteen."
-
To be honest, we wouldn’t have thought that we’d be writing about “sexual racism” after already covering claims that it’s transphobic to exclude trans people from your dating pool, but there you go. So what is sexual racism? Writer and LGBT rights campaigner Alexander Leon explains that it’s when white people exclude people of color from their sex lives, but it’s most definitely not when people of color exclude white people from their sex lives.
Yeah, right.
Basically, then, what he's saying is that only whites can be racist. Got it.
-
I also disagree that there's not structural "selection" or prejudice based on height (I wouldn't call it oppression, because because oppression is an actual real thing and not everything bad is oppression). Race and height are similar in my opinion, except that height does confer concrete advantages in some ways, while (current orthodoxy says that) race is purely appearance.
There are un-ignorable statistical anomalies in achievement based on height. CEOs are demonstrably taller than the general population, by a factor far too large to be chance. So, if short CEOs are practically non-existent, is that the fault of the short CEOs, or are there social factors that conspire against them? Should we have initiatives and laws to try to get more representation by short people into leadership positions? Unlike race, from what I see it doesn't seem like anyone cares much about the plight of short people. Not to mention that women are statistically far shorter than men, so biology itself is very sexist here. So discrimination based on height is probably just as active, and creates just as much difference in our society as discrimination based on race. Nobody seems to talk about it though, even though one's height is just as much out of their control as their race, and even though it doesn't matter to performance in the vast majority of jobs.
So instead of pointing out that sexual discrimination (which I will continue to engage in enthusiastically and without apology) based on race is worse than based on height, I would say it's just about the same thing, because when it comes to propogation of the species, people are going to discriminate based on physical factors and that's just the way it is.
I'm shorter than average, I demand reparations for a lifetime of heightist discrimination.
As far as my sex life is concerned I pretty much exclude every race except for 1 Native American. If I didn't I'm fairly confident my Cherokee wife would scalp my ass.
-
But if you are white and have sex with a black person, that would probably be perceived as being like a plantation owner abusing his slave, so that is racist too.
-
I'm shorter than average, I demand reparations for a lifetime of heightist discrimination.
As far as my sex life is concerned I pretty much exclude every race except for 1 Native American. If I didn't I'm fairly confident my Cherokee wife would scalp my ass.
So you are oppressing the Native American female population, then?
-
Is anybody else thinking that this is a scam put forth by a right-winger just to see how far the libtards can be pushed by the "threat" of being called racist?
=D
-
in an old SNL skit from the seventies, Garret Morris gives an editorial about the Rolling Stones song Some Girls.
He acts like he is offended by the line "black girls wanna get %$&#*ed all night"....
Then he asks: "where are all these black girls"?
It's hilarious and completely scrubbed off the internet.
I've been hoping Trump declares that young attractive women should not try to convince older white conservative men to change by doing a reverse "Lysistrata"
-
Is anybody else thinking that this is a scam put forth by a right-winger just to see how far the libtards can be pushed by the "threat" of being called racist?
=D
Might be worth checking 4chan.
-
So Thomas Jefferson is off the hook, I guess.
-
Is there anything left to add to the "You're a racist if.." list?
The professional Left could just declare that everything, except black people (with the correct opinions on everything), is racist. But they need the job security of doing the same thing seriatim ad infinitum.
-
Does frequenting black prostitutes count?
Just asking for the record. It's so hard to know what the ground rules are these days.
-
So Thomas Jefferson is off the hook, I guess.
:lol:
-
It's so hard to know what the ground rules are these days.
I think that's part of it, and it goes all the way back to people of color and before that it was African-American and before that it was black and before that it was negro and before that it was colored people. The left wants you to be so confused, you're afraid to say anything.
-
I think that's part of it, and it goes all the way back to people of color and before that it was African-American and before that it was black and before that it was negro and before that it was colored people. The left wants you to be so confused, you're afraid to say anything.
(https://maggiemcneill.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/bloom-county-euphemism-treadmill.jpg)
(from Steve Dallas' "woke" phase)
-
What's next?
Watch out for Racist Tranny Phobia - an affliction of straight white males who don't find transvestites of color attractive.
(Well . . . you did ask. And watch out for NAMBLA trying to go mainstream.)
-
Can I just identify as a black female lesbian that only likes white women?
-
Can I just identify as a black female lesbian that only likes white women?
I tried something similar in San Francisco, they catch on pretty quickly :rofl:
-
(https://maggiemcneill.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/bloom-county-euphemism-treadmill.jpg)
(from Steve Dallas' "woke" phase)
I remember that comic, but I thought it was Doonesbury. (probably why I haven't been able to find it) Thanks.
-
People have got to stop talking about race plain and simple. It's a red herring for actual issues in society. Morgan Freeman says it best :lol:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3cGfrExozQ
-
excuse me miss, can you help me prove I'm not a racist?
-
"As far as my sex life is concerned I pretty much exclude every race except for 1 Native American. If I didn't I'm fairly confident my Cherokee wife would scalp my ass."
So, your saying that short men have hairy asses? Do you know if you have a wild one? :P :old:
PS: It's inclusive to say colored people as all people have a color of some kind. You should post that on twitter and then embrace all the love you will get from certain folks of a brain shortage. I dare ya.