i was betting on a poorly balanced load, or loose cargo shifting.
Do you have some info you're not sharing with the authorities?
Local residents have long campaigned to have this particular runway shut down, and said the crash was entirely predictable.
Quick, call the Psychic Network!
Belgian TV reported that the plane was carrying diplomatic baggage belonging to the US Ambassador to Belgium, including a car and papers. The US embassy in Brussels refused to comment.
It sounds like the plane was loaded pretty light.
"This was very close to a catastrophe," said Frederic Petit of the local residents' association. "Imagine if it had been an aircraft full of passengers!"
Imagine if it had been full of nukular bombs!
"Since 2004, freight planes have been using this runway on Saturdays and Sundays, yet it is 1,000 metres (yards) shorter than the others," he added.
Well, actually it's 651 meters shorter than the longest runway and 224 meters shorter than the next longest. In any case, it's plenty long for a lightly loaded 747. I've seen plenty of 747's and C5's take off from runways 1000 meters shorter (ZOMG!) than that.
In October 1992, an Israeli El Al Boeing 747 cargo plane crashed into a residential block after taking off from Amsterdam airport, killing the crew and 39 people on the ground. Both engines on its right wing had fallen off.
In December 1999, a Korean Air Boeing 747 cargo plane crashed soon after take-off from Stansted airport near London, killing all four crew.
Which has exactly what to do with a crash in Brussels?
This story is long on sensationalism and poor writing, and short on facts.