Economic Freedom of the World 2008

[MicroBalrog]

Economic Freedom of the World 2008

Israel's economic freedom ranking drops to 76. Last year it was 44. Hong Kong and Singapore rank number one and two.

Israel ranks 76th in the world in terms of economic freedom according to the Economic Freedom of the World: 2008 Annual Report, released today by the Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies (JIMS). The setback is substantial since Israel ranked 44th in last year's report.

While other countries in the world have become freer over the past year, Israel has suffered from more regulation and an ever growing public sector. Israel's very poor ranking this year is mainly due to the severe drop in one component - government enterprises and investment- this component measures the extent to which countries use private rather than government enterprises to produce goods and services. This component is published by the IMF's Government Finance Statistics electronic data. "Government firms play by rules that are different from those to which private enterprises are subject. They are not dependent on consumers for their revenue or on investors for capital. They often operate in protected markets. Because public firms are not subject to competition, they can charge higher prices for lower quality services" says Professor Robert Sauer, President of JIMS.

The report ranks Hong Kong number one, followed by Singapore then New Zealand. Zimbabwe once again has the lowest level of economic freedom among the 141 jurisdictions included in the study, followed by Angola and Myanmar.

The annual peer-reviewed Economic Freedom of the World report is produced by Canada's Fraser Institute in cooperation with independent institutes in 75 nations and territories. It uses 42 different measures to create an index ranking countries around the world based on policies that encourage economic freedom.

The cornerstones of economic freedom are personal choice, voluntary exchange, freedom to compete, and security of private property. Economic freedom is measured in five different areas: (1) size of government; (2) legal structure and security of property rights; (3) access to sound money; (4) freedom to trade internationally; and (5) regulation of credit, labor and business.

Research shows that individuals living in countries with high levels of economic freedom enjoy higher levels of prosperity, greater individual freedoms, and longer life spans. This year's report also contains new research showing the impact of economic freedom on poverty reduction.

"Economic freedom is one of the key building blocks of the most prosperous nations around the world. Countries with high levels of economic freedom are those in which people enjoy high standards of living and personal freedoms. Countries at the bottom of the index face the opposite situation; their citizens are more likely to be poor and to face a corrupted government," said Corinne Sauer, Director of JIMS.

These are Israel's scores in key components of economic freedom (ranging from 1 to 10 where a higher value indicates a higher level of economic freedom):

    * Size of government: changed to 3.8 from 5.3 in the last year's report
    * Legal structures and security of property rights: changed to 6.2 from 6.6
    * Access to sound money: changed to 9.1 from 9.3
    * Freedom to trade internationally: changed to 7.6 from 7.8
    * Regulation of credit, labor and business: changed to 6.4 from 6.7

Israel's rankings were significantly weakened due to Israel's oversized government. One of Israel's lowest ratings (2.1), stable since 1990, was in the rate of government spending as a percentage of total consumption. Israel also loses points due to extremely burdensome tax rates.

The full report is available at www.freetheworld.com

http://www.jims-israel.org/economicfreedom2008.aspx

[K Frame]

And, your feelings, aside from this simply being a cut and paste drive by?

[MicroBalrog]

And, your feelings, aside from this simply being a cut and paste drive by?

Oh. Apologies.

I blame Kadima and Labor, and, to a great degree, Shas for their money-milking.

This was precisely predicted during the elections, nobody listened.

[Hutch]

Hard to accept Hong Kong's rating, given they've been ceded back to the PRC.  I must admit, tho', I didn't chase the link.

[Perd Hapley]

When the British returned Hong Kong to PRC control in 1997, it was with the understanding that Hong Kong's legal systems and liberties would remain in place for the next fifty years. 

http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/basic_law.pdf

The Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of
Hong Kong (the Joint Declaration) was signed between
the Chinese and British Governments on December 19,
1984. It sets out, among other things, the basic policies of
the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) regarding Hong
Kong. Under the principle of one country, two systems,
the socialist system and policies shall not be practised in
the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR)
and Hong Kongs previous capitalist system and
life-style shall remain unchanged for 50 years. The Joint
Declaration provides that these basic policies will be
stipulated in a Basic Law of the HKSAR. The Basic Law
of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region was
adopted on April 4, 1990 by the Seventh National Peoples
Congress (NPC) of the PRC. It was put into effect on July
1, 1997.

[roo_ster]

Research shows that individuals living in countries with high levels of economic freedom enjoy higher levels of prosperity, greater individual freedoms, and longer life spans. This year's report also contains new research showing the impact of economic freedom on poverty reduction.

I would think that there is also some correlation between economic freedom and the usual measures of environmental goodness.