Author Topic: Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'  (Read 1072 times)

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,946
http://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.com/2009/04/environmental-consequences-of-free.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/apr/09/shipping-pollution

Saw this topic on Preacherman's blog and thought it would be good to pass on.  I find it a bit funny.  I guess I picture some environmental activist saying "we finally have all this pollution under control!!!... wait ... what?"  It seems to me that they and regulatory agencies often seem to have blinders on when it comes to pollution.  They are hard on some issues and easy on others. 

Quote
Britain and other European governments have been accused of underestimating the health risks from shipping pollution following research which shows that one giant container ship can emit almost the same amount of cancer and asthma-causing chemicals as 50m cars.

Confidential data from maritime industry insiders based on engine size and the quality of fuel typically used by ships and cars shows that just 15 of the world's biggest ships may now emit as much pollution as all the world's 760m cars. Low-grade ship bunker fuel (or fuel oil) has up to 2,000 times the sulphur content of diesel fuel used in US and European automobiles.

Pressure is mounting on the UN's International Maritime Organisation and the EU to tighten laws governing ship emissions following the decision by the US government last week to impose a strict 230-mile buffer zone along the entire US coast, a move that is expected to be followed by Canada.

The setting up of a low emission shipping zone follows US academic research which showed that pollution from the world's 90,000 cargo ships leads to 60,000 deaths a year in the US alone and costs up to $330bn per year in health costs from lung and heart diseases. The US Environmental Protection Agency estimates the buffer zone, which could be in place by next year, will save more than 8,000 lives a year with new air quality standards cutting sulphur in fuel by 98%, particulate matter by 85% and nitrogen oxide emissions by 80%.

The new study by the Danish government's environmental agency adds to this picture. It suggests that shipping emissions cost the Danish health service almost £5bn a year, mainly treating cancers and heart problems. A previous study estimated that 1,000 Danish people die prematurely each year because of shipping pollution. No comprehensive research has been carried out on the effects on UK coastal communities, but the number of deaths is expected to be much higher.

Europe, which has some of the busiest shipping lanes in the world, has dramatically cleaned up sulphur and nitrogen emissions from land-based transport in the past 20 years but has resisted imposing tight laws on the shipping industry, even though the technology exists to remove emissions. Cars driving 15,000km a year emit approximately 101 grammes of sulphur oxide gases (or SOx) in that time. The world's largest ships' diesel engines which typically operate for about 280 days a year generate roughly 5,200 tonnes of SOx.

The EU plans only two low-emission marine zones which should come into force in the English channel and Baltic sea after 2015. However, both are less stringent than the proposed US zone, and neither seeks to limit deadly particulate emissions.

Shipping emissions have escalated in the past 15 years as China has emerged as the world's manufacturing capital. A new breed of intercontinental container ship has been developed which is extremely cost-efficient. However, it uses diesel engines as powerful as land-based power stations but with the lowest quality fuel.

"Ship pollution affects the health of communities in coastal and inland regions around the world, yet pollution from ships remains one of the least regulated parts of our global transportation system," said James Corbett, professor of marine policy at the University of Delaware, one of the authors of the report which helped persuade the US government to act.

Today a spokesman for the UK government's Maritime and Coastguard Agency accepted there were major gaps in the legislation. "Issues of particulate matter remain a concern. They need to be addressed and we look forward to working with the international community," said environment policy director Jonathan Simpson.

"Europe needs a low emission zone right around its coasts, similar to the US, if we are to meet health and environmental objectives," said Crister Agrena of the Air Pollution and Climate Secretariat in Gothenburg, one of Europe's leading air quality organisations.

"It is unacceptable that shipping remains one of the most polluting industries in the world. The UK must take a lead in cleaning up emissions," said Simon Birkett, spokesman for the Campaign for Clean Air in London. "Other countries are planning radical action to achieve massive health and other savings but the UK is strangely inactive."

The calculations of ship and car pollution are based on the world's largest 85,790KW ships' diesel engines which operate about 280 days a year generating roughly 5,200 tonnes of SOx a year, compared with diesel and petrol cars which drive 15,000km a year and emit approximately 101gm of SO2/SoX a year.
Shipping by numbers

The world's biggest container ships have 109,000 horsepower engines which weigh 2,300 tons.

Each ship expects to operate 24hrs a day for about 280 days a year

There are 90,000 ocean-going cargo ships

Shipping is responsible for 18-30% of all the world's nitrogen oxide (NOx) pollution and 9% of the global sulphur oxide (SOx) pollution.

One large ship can generate about 5,000 tonnes of sulphur oxide (SOx) pollution in a year

70% of all ship emissions are within 400km of land.

85% of all ship pollution is in the northern hemisphere.

Shipping is responsible for 3.5% to 4% of all climate change emissions
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Standing Wolf

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,978
Re: Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2009, 07:51:05 PM »
Toe nail clippings cause global warming!
No tyrant should ever be allowed to die of natural causes.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,946
Re: Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2009, 08:30:14 PM »
I was thinking that they go to all this trouble to remove sulfur from deisel and increase it's price yet fail to look at fuel oil? 

What kind of fuel oil is used for home heat up north?  Is it the same or is it "low sulfur"?
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

never_retreat

  • Head Muckety Muck
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,158
Re: Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2009, 08:59:06 PM »
I was thinking that they go to all this trouble to remove sulfur from deisel and increase it's price yet fail to look at fuel oil? 

What kind of fuel oil is used for home heat up north?  Is it the same or is it "low sulfur"?

No heating oil is not ULSD, but it does contain paraffins that aren't in diesel. It jells easier also. The ships there referring to burn bunker oil, #6 I believe. Its almost a solid at room temperature.
I needed a mod to change my signature because the concept of "family friendly" eludes me.
Just noticed that a mod changed my signature. How long ago was that?
A few months-mods

MicroBalrog

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,505
Re: Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2009, 11:23:33 PM »
Remember, every time you consume something, you're hurting Mother Gaia. You should be feeling guilty every time you buy a new TV or computer, or, God forbid, a car.
Destroy The Enemy in Hand-to-Hand Combat.

"...tradition and custom becomes intertwined and are a strong coercion which directs the society upon fixed lines, and strangles liberty. " ~ William Graham Sumner

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,386
Re: Health risks of shipping pollution have been 'underestimated'
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2009, 11:50:01 PM »
Quote
Britain and other European governments have been accused of underestimating the health risks from shipping pollution following research which shows that one giant container ship can emit almost the same amount of cancer and asthma-causing chemicals as 50m cars

That's 50 million cars?

Damn, I want to drive a container ship to work now. Suddenly, my eeeeviiiiillllllll V8 Truck just is not cutting it when it comes to flipping off the enviroweenies.
Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!