Author Topic: my satiracal friend again  (Read 1118 times)

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
my satiracal friend again
« on: May 09, 2010, 10:43:38 AM »
Democrats all over the country have experienced despair and heart break over the fact that the Times Square bomber wasn't someone that could easily be characterized as a right wing, hate mongering, racist, Christian, Republican supporting nut. We watched in horror as the news broke that the Times Square bomber's name, country of origin, and religion, and ideological ties were reported. It is so troubling, so troubling, indeed.

However, there is news that the Times Square bomber very well could have ties to the swastika bearing, thug filled, angry crowds of the Tea Party. There is now a suspicion that the kid who bags groceries at the food market where the Times Square bomber (name not important) bought his flat bread and eggs may have an uncle that knows some people who have participated in Tea Party rallies.

This news gives comfort to all of us Democrats, news reporters, Obama voters, and other middle of the road Americans.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRmPTN07Iz4&feature=player_embedded
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,013
  • ...shall not be infringed.
Re: my satiracal friend again
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2010, 12:38:24 PM »
^ How delightfully hilarious!
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

230RN

  • I saw it coming.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,013
  • ...shall not be infringed.
Re: my satiracal friend again
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2010, 12:39:59 PM »
Double post.  Sorry.  No, I'm not trying to get my post count to 100. 
WHATEVER YOUR DEFINITION OF "INFRINGE " IS, YOU SHOULDN'T BE DOING IT.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: my satiracal friend again
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2010, 12:50:06 PM »
this guy has been playing this role for a couple years  drives the liberals crazy.  hes so good at it that quite often some newcomer will go off about his liberal nonsense they think hes serious.  which makes it even better cause the libs realize how ridiculous they appear.  the best happens three or 4 times a year when a "moderate liberal" is taken in and attempts to rein in the radical leftist gently. he has literally hundreds of posts like that and most are linked to some bizarre liberal activity that he is "supporting.  he drives em nuts
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

280plus

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 19,131
  • Ever get that sinking feeling?
Re: my satiracal friend again
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2010, 01:18:14 PM »
Sorry.  No, I'm not trying to get my post count to 100. 
Underachiever!  :P
Avoid cliches like the plague!

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re: my satiracal friend again
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2010, 06:53:24 PM »
Obama promised to bring us long hoped for fundamental change in the U.S. He continues to deliver on that promise. First, he re-distributed a trillion borrowed dollars to the states to reward them for supporting his presidential campaign. That kind of gratitude using our children's money has never been seen in the history of the world making it true change.

Second, he was able to convince enough members of his party to vote for Obamacare even though the final bill had never been read or even written. That is fundamental change that could only come from the Democratic Party USA.

Now, we learn that Obama has even brought fundamental change the laws of physics. In an unprecedented move, Obama is able to listen to his almost god-like iPod playlist ( http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/25/barackobama.uselections2008 ) even though he has no idea how to use an iPod. ( http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkel...w-how-work-ipod )

In the days of Bush, this would have been impossible. Bush would have been caught in a lie: either he uses and listens to his iPod or he doesn't know how to use it and is a liar using the iPod to make himself look "cool."

But, Obama's change has made both things possible. Obama has no idea how to use an iPod even though he listens to that cool play list all the time.

That is fundamental change we all can believe in and it's the kind of exceptional changes to universal natural laws that we have grown accustomed to from Obama.

Another example of fundamental change to these heretofore immutable laws is the way he was able to add trillions and trillions to the U.S. budget through Obamacare, cover millions and millions more people with the same number of doctors as we have now, all while lowering the deficit and, ultimately, the U.S. debt.

This man Obama truly is the father of the little peoples.
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

BMacklem

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 217
Re: my satiracal friend again
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2010, 02:10:07 AM »
Actually he isn't planning on covering millions and millions more people with the same number of doctors, he's planning on doing that with far fewer doctors than we have now.

In fact we're probably going to lose a fairly large number of practitioners of medicine just from attrition, let alone the fact that they want to get rid of most of the specialists altogether.

I've heard of nigh countless doctors who are planning on getting out while the gettings still (sorta) good.