Wait. I thought wearing heels was objectifying wimmens.
Wearing heels is objectifying women.
Women working enslaves women to the corporate workplace.
Women not working enslaves them to the family.
Women wearing 'modest' clothes enslaves them to patriarchy.
Women wearing 'immodest' clothes objectifies them.
Every single role a woman can take in a society is some form of capitalist slavery. As such there's no actual freedom as the classical liberal historical consensus tells us - in fact all of it is forms of capitalist slavery.
As such, what moral argument do you ACTUALLY have to say that George Bush is morally superior to Pol Pot? Does not America enslave women?