Author Topic: NiMH v. NiCd v. primary alkaline batteries  (Read 1413 times)

zxcvbob

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,278
NiMH v. NiCd v. primary alkaline batteries
« on: April 01, 2013, 08:51:46 PM »
Which battery technology will work best in a low-drain, frequently used device? (bluetooth mouse, uses 2 AAA cells)  I have unopened packages of Harbor Freight NiMH and NiCd batteries already, and there's gotta be a charger around here somewhere...  Alkaline batteries lasted about a month of daily use.

If I recall correctly, NiCd's last twice as many cycles (or more) than NiMH and have a lower self-discharge rate.  But also less than 1/2 the energy density.  No idea how that compares to alkaline and "heavy duty" (zinc chloride) carbon-zinc batteries.
"It's good, though..."

vaskidmark

  • National Anthem Snob
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,799
  • WTF?
Re: NiMH v. NiCd v. primary alkaline batteries
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2013, 09:13:50 PM »
I've moved to NiMH rechargables for just about everything that does not use a CR-123, and for those I've gone to RCR-123 rechargables.

NiCAD has probably 500 cycles per the tech specs, but it's more like you will get 350-400, plus you run the risk of memory set even in use where you are not recharging till they pretty much crap out on you.  Run them completely down and you have a piece of trash.  Reconditioning NiCADs is a slow, painful process but will wipe out the memory disfunction.  NiMH have a closer to honest 1000 cycles with no memory set.

Alkalines can be recharged, but not on the machines for NiCAD or NiMH.  In the early days of NiCAD rechargers had a switch for alkalines or NiCad.  Good luck finding one these days.  Back when I had a recharger, it said I could get 10 ncycles out of an alkaline.  I do not remember if that was accurate or not.  NiCAD/NiMH rechargers exist - be sure to put the switch in the right position.

Do a cost comparison across the anticipated number of uses for each chemistry.

stay safe.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.

Hey you kids!! Get off my lawn!!!

They keep making this eternal vigilance thing harder and harder.  Protecting the 2nd amendment is like playing PACMAN - there's no pause button so you can go to the bathroom.

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,359
Re: NiMH v. NiCd v. primary alkaline batteries
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2013, 09:33:39 PM »
NiMH are FAR better. But ... throw the Harbor Freight ones away. I had some of those for a digital camera. They wouldn't last a week between uses of the camera. I gave up. Went to Wal-Mart and bought a set of Ray-O-Vacs, and they'll hold a charge for weeks, maybe months. And they'll hold up for a full day of using the camera.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

DustinD

  • I have a title
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 919
  • I have a personal text message
Re: NiMH v. NiCd v. primary alkaline batteries
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2013, 10:11:18 PM »
Eneloop brand or similar low discharge NiMH would be the best. Of the two you mentioned use the NiMH unless those are needed for something else where it matters more. Also note that NiCad are a bit lighter than NiMH.
"I don't always shoot defenceless women in the face, but when I do, I prefer H-S Precision.

Stay bloodthirsty, my friends."

                       - Lon Horiuchi

GigaBuist

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,345
    • http://www.justinbuist.org/blog/
Re: NiMH v. NiCd v. primary alkaline batteries
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2013, 10:31:51 PM »
Personally I'd toss the AAA battery mouse for one that takes AA batteries.  You get about 3x more energy in a AA battery compared to AAA which makes them much more convenient for a mouse.

A NiCD AAA will give you 300mAh of power.  NiMH will do 800mAh on the low end, some brands proclaim up to 1000 mAh.  And, yes, NiMH self discharges at a higher rate but you're starting with 3x the power.  So if NiCD is 10% a month and NiMH is 30% a month you end up with something like this:

NiCd 0 months: 300
NiMH 0 months: 900
NiCd 1 months: 270
NiMH 1 months: 630
NiCd 2 months: 243
NiMH 2 months: 441

Yeah, NiCd doesn't really come out on top here.  Not even when idle.  When you're actually using something NiMH wins out handily.

Plus there are LSD (Low self discharge) NiMH batteries out there that only give of 2% per month.  I don't use many of them, but it's true, they really do work.  You give up a bit in peak capacity, so I tend to keep them around for flashlights, not my XBOX controller, but they are nice.  You'll see the LSD stuff labeled as "pre charged" usually.  Marketing weirdo stuff. I guess people hate getting cells that only put out 1.1 volts upon arrival and need a charger to become operational.  Makes sense from a marketing perspective but the labeling is confusing to people that just want a good LSD battery.

A good charger will do a lot to keep your batteries in good condition.  Cheap chargers ($10) that require a pair of batteries to actually do anything measure voltage across the two and don't cut off the charge current until they hit 3.0V-ish combined.  That means if you put in a pair with one semi-charged and one darned near dead it heats up the better battery too far.  It's still handy to have one around, though, because they're cheap and they'll keep 2-4 batteries topped of nicely.  

My favorite chargers are the BC series from La Crosse.  I have the BC-700, but the BC-9009 is as good, if not better.  It charges cells one at a time.  The BC-700 will put up to 700 mAh back into a battery and the 9009 will do 900 mAh.  Both are pretty safe if you're dealing with AA batteries.  I like to keep my AAA cells charging at 500mAh.  The BC series lets you pick the charge rate.

Unfortunately if you let a battery go REALLY dead the BC series won't do anything.  It detects battery presence based on voltage so if I shove a totally dead one in there I'm screwed.  I just toss it into a cheap dual-charger with a decent battery and let that ramp it back up to normal voltage.  But, given that I have the BC charger which will tell me current voltage I can figure out which batteries are also close to darned near dead and I can pair that with a dead one before sticking it in the dumber charger.  That prevents overheating.  Overheating reduces battery life.

And for cheap, but good, cells I'd recommend http://batteryspace.com  ... their 'Tenergy' brand has done me well.  For LSD I'd say hit Amazon and pick up GP Recyko branded stuff.  And if you want a charger they've got great prices on the La Crosse stuff there too.  Unfortunately the Targus branded wall-wart that I use for brute forcing batteries back to health is no longer on Amazon.  I got it for $10 and it came with 4 2500mAh AA batteries.  It was a steal.

zahc

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,808
Re: NiMH v. NiCd v. primary alkaline batteries
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2013, 11:52:47 PM »
Nicad are obsolete except for very niche, extremely high drain applications, and/or where very long (discharged) shelf life is needed, and where the relatively dismal specific energy density is not a problem. Forget nicads.

Stop thinking in terms of 'nimh' because there is such a vast spectrum of quality and performance out there that nimh cells do not compare as a group. You cannot go wrong with eneloops; they make good replacements for alkalines in most applications, except low-drain applications that require high voltage.

My rule: if the batterys go dead in less than a year, it gets eneloops. Smoke detectors and remote controls still get alkaline.
Maybe a rare occurence, but then you only have to get murdered once to ruin your whole day.
--Tallpine