Author Topic: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment  (Read 3030 times)

Devonai

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,647
  • Panic Mode Activated
    • Kyrie Devonai Publishing
Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« on: April 28, 2013, 01:09:31 PM »
One thing I've always wondered is the legality of requiring a bank account and direct deposit as a condition of employment.  Both the National Guard and my last couple of civilian employers required it.  If one wanted to quit using a bank entirely (perhaps influenced by the latest round of Greek/Euro implosions), do you think that rejecting a potential applicant, or firing a current employee, would stand up in court?

Personally I like the ease of having direct deposit for my pay and direct debit for most of my bills.  However, it bothers me somewhat on a philosophical level that if I closed out my bank account I could get in trouble.  It might make for an interesting lawsuit.  What do you think?
My writing blog: Kyrie Devonai Publishing

When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2013, 01:14:13 PM »
It goes back farther than you think.

My first real job in 1971 required direct deposit into a checking account.

It was a bank  =D


I really don't like the idea of the dot gov doing direct deposit.  I still file paper tax returns and demand a paper check.
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

lupinus

  • Southern Mod Trimutive Emeritus
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,178
Re: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2013, 01:54:31 PM »
Becoming more and more common.

My current employer gives two options, neither of which involve a piece of paper.

You can have direct deposit, or they will give you a debit type card which they load every payday. Only time the issue a paper check is if they screw something up and you bitch to the right person during the right phase of the moon after sacrificing the proper unblemished animal in the proper prescribed manner. 
That is all. *expletive deleted*ck you all, eat *expletive deleted*it, and die in a fire. I have considered writing here a long parting section dedicated to each poster, but I have decided, at length, against it. *expletive deleted*ck you all and Hail Satan.

Boomhauer

  • Former Moderator, fired for embezzlement and abuse of power
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,386
Re: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2013, 02:01:13 PM »
Doesn't matter whether you get a paper check or direct deposit for either pay or tax "refund". Either way the .gov knows how much you make as it's reported by your employer (unless you are under the table employed)...

If you are uncomfortable having your money in a bank account go ahead and draw it out when you get paid.

My agency still offers paper checks but direct deposit doesn't depend on the mail and our payroll people somehow manage excellent accuracy (compared to when I worked for the feds which was guaranteed to be a flusterlcuck every payday...) so I stick with having mine DD'd




Quote from: Ben
Holy hell. It's like giving a loaded gun to a chimpanzee...

Quote from: bluestarlizzard
the last thing you need is rabies. You're already angry enough as it is.

OTOH, there wouldn't be a tweeker left in Georgia...

Quote from: Balog
BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE! AND THROW SOME STEAK ON THE GRILL!

Tallpine

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 23,172
  • Grumpy Old Grandpa
Re: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« Reply #4 on: April 28, 2013, 03:38:53 PM »
Being way the heck out of town, the direct deposit works good for us.   =)
Freedom is a heavy load, a great and strange burden for the spirit to undertake. It is not easy. It is not a gift given, but a choice made, and the choice may be a hard one. The road goes upward toward the light; but the laden traveller may never reach the end of it.  - Ursula Le Guin

cordex

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,735
Re: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« Reply #5 on: April 28, 2013, 05:17:13 PM »
Find a bank with no or low checking fees and drain it on payday.

drewtam

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,985
Re: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« Reply #6 on: April 28, 2013, 09:06:47 PM »
One thing I've always wondered is the legality of requiring a bank account and direct deposit as a condition of employment.  Both the National Guard and my last couple of civilian employers required it.  If one wanted to quit using a bank entirely (perhaps influenced by the latest round of Greek/Euro implosions), do you think that rejecting a potential applicant, or firing a current employee, would stand up in court?

Personally I like the ease of having direct deposit for my pay and direct debit for most of my bills.  However, it bothers me somewhat on a philosophical level that if I closed out my bank account I could get in trouble.  It might make for an interesting lawsuit.  What do you think?

I think its similar to a company refusing to pay cash to employees, but instead requires payment by check. I think DD requirements are a modern version of the same thing.
I’m not saying I invented the turtleneck. But I was the first person to realize its potential as a tactical garment. The tactical turtleneck! The… tactleneck!

SteveS

  • The Voice of Reason
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,224
Re: Direct Deposit as a Condition of Employment
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2013, 05:12:40 PM »
One thing I've always wondered is the legality of requiring a bank account and direct deposit as a condition of employment.  Both the National Guard and my last couple of civilian employers required it.  If one wanted to quit using a bank entirely (perhaps influenced by the latest round of Greek/Euro implosions), do you think that rejecting a potential applicant, or firing a current employee, would stand up in court?

Personally I like the ease of having direct deposit for my pay and direct debit for most of my bills.  However, it bothers me somewhat on a philosophical level that if I closed out my bank account I could get in trouble.  It might make for an interesting lawsuit.  What do you think?

Absent some kind of employment contract that specifies how you are paid, I am not aware of any law or regulation that would prevent an employer from requiring direct deposit.  I don't do employment law, so this isn't an area that I am overly familiar with.
Profanity is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate mother****er.