A number of sites are currently discussing the recently-discovered anti-gun manifesto that's being used as a playbook by the gun control movement. The key word/phrase is "gun violence," which conflates violence in today's society with guns, creating in susceptible minds the ineradicable notion that guns are somehow responsible for violence (rather than, say, gangs, or bad people).
Those of us on the pro-gun, pro-Constitution side have noted frequently that, when guns are not available, people will use whatever tool/implement/weapon they have to perpetrate their violence. In the infamous case of the Petit murders in Connecticut a few years ago, the weapons used were a baseball bat, a can of gasoline, and a match.
And now we have proof that if a would-be assailant doesn't have a gun or a pressure cooker bomb ... he probably has access to a car:
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/08/03/2-seriously-hurt-2-critical-after-car-plows-into-venice-boardwalk-crowd/So when will the bleeding hearts in California (and nationally) start talking up "car control" and actively seeking to reduce "car violence"?