Nahh, Obama (Mr. "Ill be more flexible") has his lips firmly planted on Putin's ass.
Most of the Wikileaks stuff was simply embarrassing. (Although there was plenty of operational Intel that was in there also.)
There are a few differences between Manning and Snowden:
1) Manning dumped everything he had to Wikileaks. Snowden has only provided some of what he knows.
2) Manning intel dump was of diplomatic and military operations. Some of the Diplomatic stuff was honest assessments and evaluations of of nominal allies. Embarrassing stuff to the US. Some of the Military stuff gave AQ and others insight into how we do things which enabled them to come up with counters to those activities/actions. Snowden pointed out that the US.gov is treating it's citizens as the enemy and violating the consitution. (I don't care how many judges said "It's okay." and even if Congress passed a law saying it's okay. It's still unconstitutional. End. Period. Full Stop.) I also don't think that Snowden has given away anything people didn't already know. "We're listening to China phone calls." Like the Chinese didn't already know that. Hell, we've been waging cyber war with them (and many others) since damn the time Al Gore birthed the Interwebztubes.
3) Manning wanted to hurt the US. Snowden wanted to warn the US. \
But getting back to the OP's question. No. Obama doesn't have the 'nads to to anything other than read another teleprompter speech, and then run into the Oval Office, call Putin and tell , he's just kidding and it's all for show.