If not, you ought to know this character who calls himself "Open Carry" keeps popping up here with threads about him getting banned at THR and then the threads are deleted. He claimed he deleted the first one himself. Here's the last.
***
Look folks, do I miss posting privileges on the low road? No. Can I get back on and around their ban in 30 seconds using a proxy? Yes if I wanted to. My point in posting what I did was to appeal to any sense of justice among the members here. I think we ALL know that the people at the low road are utterly ban happy. The philosophical question, is does injustice bother us, or do we take the mentally lazy road and assume that whatever happens to someone is justified?
I would like to discuss the PROFOUND lack of empathy in americans now. They quite literally do not care what happens to their fellow citizen, no matter what the situation. Americans have become the epitome of selfish and callous.
The people current americans hate the MOST are those who A. make them think independently from the pre selected "norms" B. want to talk about uncomfortable things that have no instant solution, and C. dare to challenge those with power.
Like children, americans prefer to attack the messenger instead of discuss a philosophical/moral/legal point.
Whenever a question cannot be solved IMMEDIATELY and easily, americans want to move onto something else.
As proof of all this, when americans are ever confronted with evidence of their behavior, they respond with mentally lazy kneejerk reactions that usually involve telling the messenger to "move to Cuba then," or "move to china if you hate america so much" or similar diversionary tactics.
I am honestly curious to see if responders to this thread are capable of discussing the points I raised instead of focusing on ME.
Last edited by open carry (Today 09:23:47)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACpistol.com * MPP
Offline
Report | Quote
#2 Today 09:28:26
Stand_watie
Member
Registered: 2005-03-04
E-mail Re: I canned the previous thread but...You removed the other thread before I got a chance to see your answer to what your moniker on THR is.
Why did you remove it?
Last edited by Stand_watie (Today 09:31:54)
Online
Report | Delete | Edit | Quote
#3 Today 09:39:31
open carry
Member
From: BEHIND YOU! BOO!
Registered: 2005-12-08
E-mail Website Re: I canned the previous thread but...It was Stained_weenie
EDIT: because the thread was pointless and just a flame fest aimed at me.
Last edited by open carry (Today 09:49:41)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACpistol.com * MPP
Offline
Report | Quote
#4 Today 09:47:35
Twycross
Member
From: Moscow, Idaho
Registered: 2006-04-06
E-mail Re: I canned the previous thread but...Can I get back on and around their ban in 30 seconds using a proxy? Yes if I wanted to.
As you admitted in the other thread, you have already done this at least once (in violation of forum rules).
It was Stained_weenie
Oh, a third one? How many different aliases did you have there?
My point in posting what I did was to appeal to any sense of justice among the members here.
No, you didn't. Without giving any relevant data, you posted the PM notifying you of your ejection and expected us to just swallow that you had suffered a grievous injury.
I think we ALL know that the people at the low road are utterly ban happy.
Really. That is a matter of subjective opinion, not a fact.
The philosophical question, is does injustice bother us, or do we take the mentally lazy road and assume that whatever happens to someone is justified?
Look, you have been done no injury. THR (and APS) is the private property of Oleg Volk, and he and his appointed moderators have every right in the world to ban anyone they want to for any reason. You have no right to post there, and if Justin decided you were not going to stay, they so be it.
I am getting the feeling that this new thread is going to turn into another round of THR-bashing.
does injustice bother us, or do we take the mentally lazy road and assume that whatever happens to someone is justified?
Yes, I am bothered by injustice. As long as it actually is injustice.
Last edited by Twycross (Today 09:49:06)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He who has a 'why' to live for can bear with almost any 'how'.
- Friedrich Nietzsche
Offline
Report | Quote
#5 Today 09:55:12
open carry
Member
From: BEHIND YOU! BOO!
Registered: 2005-12-08
E-mail Website Re: I canned the previous thread but...Some are having a reeeeely hard time telling when I'm kidding. I haven't GIVEN what my username was and I don't plan to because it's irrelevant. I have tried to joke and apparently people think I've revealed what it was.
You sure like to put words in people's mouths twy. I never said I actually USED a proxy to go around some idiot's ban on THAT particular forum. I thought you would get the POINT that I don't CARE enough to do that even though it would be VERY easy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACpistol.com * MPP
Offline
Report | Quote
#6 Today 10:03:32
Stand_watie
Member
Registered: 2005-03-04
E-mail Re: I canned the previous thread but...open carry wrote:
Some are having a reeeeely hard time telling when I'm kidding. I haven't GIVEN what my username was and I don't plan to because it's irrelevant. ..
I guess I'll surmise that the moderator in question was perfectly justified then.
Online
Report | Delete | Edit | Quote
#7 Today 10:09:48
open carry
Member
From: BEHIND YOU! BOO!
Registered: 2005-12-08
E-mail Website Re: I canned the previous thread but...I guess I'll surmise that the moderator in question was perfectly justified then.
Huh? That has no logical connection to the text you quoted. You are displaying the default behavior I mentioned in my original post: i.e. assuming that an "authority" figure MUST MUST MUST be correct, and that whatever happens to someone MUST MUST MUST be justified or it wouldn't have happened. Mentally lazy assumptions both.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MACpistol.com * MPP
Offline
Report | Quote
#8 Today 10:29:46
Stand_watie
Member
Registered: 2005-03-04
E-mail Re: I canned the previous thread but...open carry wrote:
I guess I'll surmise that the moderator in question was perfectly justified then.
Huh? That has no logical connection to the text you quoted. You are displaying the default behavior I mentioned in my original post: i.e. assuming that an "authority" figure MUST MUST MUST be correct, and that whatever happens to someone MUST MUST MUST be justified or it wouldn't have happened. Mentally lazy assumptions both.
I don't have any information to go on except a couple of posts from you on here. I attempted to get more information from you and you refused to give it. Based on that, I'll assume your accusations are baseless.
Online
