I think this parallels day to day law enforcement. It is not only far easier to give a ticket to that out of town college kid for going a few miles over, but it is far safer than chasing after that scary looking guy driving recklessly in a junker.
Hard jobs take hard men and independent thinkers. Number crunchers? Now that is a much more comfortable bureaucratic satrap. And its much easier to argue numbers and trends, data points, than direct field experience. People not in the field also have much simpler records. No risk of a complaint when no one knows they were even being investigated.
Everything and everyone has its place; but you don't put the cart in front of the horse.
It is fun to watch folk's eyes glaze over when you do such fun tricks as point out how reported numbers take sudden turns mysteriously linked to such things as funding tied to specific report numbers. Much like how when facing the death penalty IQ assessments drop down to protected by law numbers. Knowing flunking a test saves your life, how hard would you try on it?