R.I.P. Scout26
Astoundingly, CDC Ebola screening/isolation standards issued following the Duncan Dallas Ebola case still do not properly contend with cases like Duncan’s -- and who knows how many of those there now are in America?
During his first visit to the Emergency Room of Texas Presbyterian, Duncan’s condition was such that he “presented with low-grade fever and abdominal pain. His condition did not warrant admission. He also was not exhibiting symptoms specific to Ebola.” Accordingly, Texas Presbyterian sent Duncan home with antibiotics.When the hospital sent the Ebola-infected Duncan home, it did so because it chose to comply with CDC policy guidelines. Those guidelines were such that even patients who had “traveled to Africa” and who had abdominal pain accompanied with fevers less than 101.5 degrees (i.e., “low-grade” fevers) were to be considered, for purposes of Ebola isolation, essentially “asymptomatic.”Now then: have you noticed that the MSM has repeatedly characterized Duncan’s case, and cases such as Duncan’s in America, as involving merely “travel to Africa”?
And yet, unbelievably, the CDC still does not intend to isolate future Duncans (see for yourself by clicking here and here -- and remember that these are policy guidelines issued after the Duncan case).Is it wholly unreasonable to suppose that the CDC is avoiding emphasis on the nationality of hot zone arrivals because it doesn’t want to draw attention to the connection of Ebola with immigration? If that is what they are doing, here is what Obama and RINOS are saying to America: immigration reform is more important than containing Ebola. These considerations perhaps give new meaning to Obama’s statement on October 2 that “no force on earth” can stop immigration reform. “No force on earth” indeed -- not even Ebola.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/10/shock-report-obama-dhs-expediting-visa-requests-from-ebola-infected-countries/
If I am reading that correctly, the visas are extensions for folks already here. They are unlikely to have Ebola.
I think Jamis is correct it's the why of the administrations actions that baffle me. I don't see what they get from it Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
90% of the administrations policies are rooted in the world view that they can make the world better by holding us back. Look at it through those glasses and it all makes sense.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you're right it's certainly working like a charm.
But they're not making the world better. Making America worse, absolutely. But who actually benefits by this ideology or its practice?
Well, also, remember that because it's Africa, shutting down travel from the affected countries (or otherwise banning travel if you've been in those countries in the last 3 weeks or so) is somehow racist.
He wrote two books. Did no one read them? Why does everyone act so surprised at what he does? He clearly outlined his beliefs.
They believe that it's working, that's all that matters.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is all. *expletive deleted*ck you all, eat *expletive deleted*it, and die in a fire. I have considered writing here a long parting section dedicated to each poster, but I have decided, at length, against it. *expletive deleted*ck you all and Hail Satan.
