Author Topic: FBI: no warrant needed to intercept calls/texts/data with fake cell towers  (Read 1711 times)

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

brimic

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,270
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/01/fbi-says-search-warrants-not-needed-to-use-stringrays-in-public-places/

Guess they skipped that whole 4th Amendment part of the FBI training.

You sound surprised that the Feds ignore the BOR.
"now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb" -Dark Helmet

"AK47's belong in the hands of soldiers mexican drug cartels"-
Barack Obama

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
You sound surprised that the Feds ignore the BOR.

No, is business as usual. The Fourth is almost as dead as the Tenth. After a while though, what else is there to say?
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

lupinus

  • Southern Mod Trimutive Emeritus
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 9,178
That is all. *expletive deleted*ck you all, eat *expletive deleted*it, and die in a fire. I have considered writing here a long parting section dedicated to each poster, but I have decided, at length, against it. *expletive deleted*ck you all and Hail Satan.

Balog

  • Unrepentant race traitor
  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 17,774
  • What if we tried more?
It's part of the training?

Apparently not.
Quote from: French G.
I was always pleasant, friendly and within arm's reach of a gun.

Quote from: Standing Wolf
If government is the answer, it must have been a really, really, really stupid question.

Scout26

  • I'm a leaf on the wind.
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 25,997
  • I spent a week in that town one night....
At the rate they're going, only the 2nd will matter....
Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants won't help.


Bring me my Broadsword and a clear understanding.
Get up to the roundhouse on the cliff-top standing.
Take women and children and bed them down.
Bless with a hard heart those that stand with me.
Bless the women and children who firm our hands.
Put our backs to the north wind.
Hold fast by the river.
Sweet memories to drive us on,
for the motherland.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
FBI: no warrant needed to intercept calls/texts/data with fake cell towers
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2015, 05:01:24 PM »
I can see how they peddle the reasonable expectation of privacy on a phone call from a crowd . I do wonder how they can defend that for a text . Unless that's just a gimme. They run it all past the court and the court tags em on one part and they keep the others.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,120
I can see how they peddle the reasonable expectation of privacy on a phone call from a cried. I do wonder how they can defend that for a text . Unless that's just a gimme. They run it all past the court and the court tags em on one part and they keep the others.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Can you expand on  that? I think I'm missing a noun.

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
FBI: no warrant needed to intercept calls/texts/data with fake cell towers
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2015, 07:49:03 PM »
I can see how they peddle the reasonable expectation of privacy on a phone call from a crowd . I do wonder how they can defend that for a text . Unless that's just a gimme. They run it all past the court and the court tags em on one part and they keep the others.

Sorry damn auto correct
A conversation in a crowd on phone if not someone can hear but not a text.

And sometimes they are like kids ask for 5 things and figure you will lose some but keep some too


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,120
Ahhhhh.

Doggy Daddy

  • Poobah
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,340
  • From the saner side of Las Vegas
Re: FBI: no warrant needed to intercept calls/texts/data with fake cell towers
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2015, 11:58:31 PM »
At the rate they're going, only the 2nd will matter....

Seems like it matters more and more every day.
Would you exchange
a walk-on part in a war
for a lead role in a cage?
-P.F.