Author Topic: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....  (Read 4937 times)

BobR

  • Just a pup compared to a few old dogs here!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,312
Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« on: July 09, 2016, 10:44:45 AM »
Quote
Delta Plane Mistakenly Lands at South Dakota Air Force Base

More than 100 Delta passengers on board a flight bound for Rapid City, South Dakota got an unexpected surprise Thursday night when their plane mistakenly landed at an Air Force Base, about five miles north of the aircraft's intended target.

Quote
"This was a gross breach of the security of our Airfield that present[ed] a potential threat to both our Airmen and our resources," Boswell added....

According to Boswell, the two runways are located 5 miles from each other and are oriented in roughly the same direction. However, the runway at Ellsworth is 13,500 feet long and 300 feet wide and marked at the threshold with a large "13" number, while the runway at Rapid City Regional Airport is only 8,701 feet long and only 150 feet wide and marked with a large "14."

"Incidents like this occur when pilots fail to execute the basic measures of airmanship," said Boswell.

Good thing this is a touchy-feely Air Force these days, Gen. Curtis LeMay would have had them all thrown in jail....forever.  ;)

http://abcnews.go.com/US/delta-plane-mistakenly-lands-south-dakota-air-force/story?id=40444218


bob

dogmush

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 13,986
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2016, 10:59:06 AM »
This happened in Tampa a couple years ago, only the other way.  A C17 put down at a podunk regional airport instead of Macdill AFB.  Faces were red all around.

French G.

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 10,199
  • ohhh sparkles!
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2016, 11:51:43 AM »
Watching the C-17 get out of the 4000 ft runway was neat. That doesn't always end well, little airports don't always have tarmac rated to hold the heavy planes.
AKA Navy Joe   

I'm so contrarian that I didn't respond to the thread.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,260
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2016, 12:24:46 PM »
Watching the C-17 get out of the 4000 ft runway was neat. That doesn't always end well, little airports don't always have tarmac rated to hold the heavy planes.

On the other end of the scale, we landed our Seawolf at VAFB on a few occasions, and used about the first 1% of the runway (built for the space shuttle). You could just about read a book before we rolled to the first taxiway.  :laugh:
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

Brad Johnson

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18,120
  • Witty, charming, handsome, and completely insane.
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2016, 12:34:02 PM »
Pilot error aside, if a commercial flight is inbound with an active transponder how the hell does someone at approach control not notice a five mile error in flight path?

Attention... attention jamisjockey... jamisjockey to the white courtesy phone....

Brad
It's all about the pancakes, people.
"And he thought cops wouldn't chase... a STOLEN DONUT TRUCK???? That would be like Willie Nelson ignoring a pickup full of weed."
-HankB

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,869
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2016, 01:46:57 PM »
Quote
Col. Gentry Boswell, 28th Bomb Wing commander at Ellsworth Air Force Base, told ABC News that while the Ellsworth Radar Approach control does control the high-level airspace for approximately 40 miles from the base, the Air Traffic Control Towers at each runway control all aircraft in their local area which is a 5-mile radius up to and including 5,900 feet.

"The Radar Approach Control gave instructions to the Delta flight in this instance and pointed out BOTH runways to the flight crew to alleviate any issues with identification of the correct airport and the crew replied they had the landing runway at Rapid City Regional Airport in sight," said Boswell.
So someone knew they were coming.  Can they not tell they are 5 miles off target?  I would have thought approach to the wrong airport would be something they would recognize. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

seeker_two

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12,922
  • In short, most intelligence is false.
Re: Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2016, 02:36:53 PM »
Good thing this is a touchy-feely Air Force these days, Gen. Curtis LeMay would have had them all thrown in jail....forever.  ;)

http://abcnews.go.com/US/delta-plane-mistakenly-lands-south-dakota-air-force/story?id=40444218


bob
LeMay would have shot them down himself....
Impressed yet befogged, they grasped at his vivid leading phrases, seeing only their surface meaning, and missing the deeper current of his thought.

Fly320s

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,415
  • Formerly, Arthur, King of the Britons
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #7 on: July 09, 2016, 02:54:58 PM »
Pilot error aside, if a commercial flight is inbound with an active transponder how the hell does someone at approach control not notice a five mile error in flight path?

Attention... attention jamisjockey... jamisjockey to the white courtesy phone....

Brad

I think once the flight is handed off to the tower, the approach controller no longer tracks the flight. Or, if the flight cancelled IFR services, then the flight track info would drop out of the system and the approach controller wouldn't see it anymore. In either case, it is the pilots' responsibility to find the right airport.
Islamic sex dolls.  Do they blow themselves up?

BobR

  • Just a pup compared to a few old dogs here!
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,312
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2016, 03:24:30 PM »
On the other end of the scale, we landed our Seawolf at VAFB on a few occasions, and used about the first 1% of the runway (built for the space shuttle). You could just about read a book before we rolled to the first taxiway.  :laugh:

We loved doing pilot training flights to Vandenberg in P3s. We could do a landing to a full stop, an aborted take off and then proceed to take off on the remaining runway to go around and do it again all without ever leaving the active runway :)

bob

41magsnub

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,579
  • Don't make me assume my ultimate form!
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2016, 06:39:50 PM »
That nearly happened on a flight my Dad was on in the 80's heading into Great Falls, during the day.  New Delta pilot to the airport.  Dad was looking out the window while they were on approach and was thinking "this looks wrong".  He'd know, he had his license at the time and flew in and out of that airport a lot.  The 727 suddenly applied power and and turned away from Malmstrom (back when there was a KC-135 squadron there and the runways were still open).   Oops.  Total opposite ends of town too.

Regolith

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,171
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #10 on: July 09, 2016, 08:45:44 PM »
On the other end of the scale, we landed our Seawolf at VAFB on a few occasions, and used about the first 1% of the runway (built for the space shuttle). You could just about read a book before we rolled to the first taxiway.  :laugh:

I did not know that submarines could fly... :O
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. - Thomas Jefferson

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt the Younger

Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything. - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth

never_retreat

  • Head Muckety Muck
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,158
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #11 on: July 09, 2016, 09:57:31 PM »
I remember leaving Honolulu thinking that we taxied for about an hour before taking off. I don't know how big that runway was.
I needed a mod to change my signature because the concept of "family friendly" eludes me.
Just noticed that a mod changed my signature. How long ago was that?
A few months-mods

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,260
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #12 on: July 09, 2016, 10:13:08 PM »
I did not know that submarines could fly... :O

Heh. The other Seawolf. Cheezy video here:

http://www.seawolfamphib.com/Quality%20Amphibians%20Home%20Page.htm

Ours was one of two special builds for the Air Force with redundant everything, which made them a pain in the ass for the mechanics. The Air Force used them for some SOCOM stuff, but then decided they didn't work well for it (because they're loud and slow, especially with all the hardpoints full of drop tanks and stuff), so they gave them to us. I worked in one of them for eleven years until we lost our budget (thanks Obama your first year in office!). Then SOCOM/SORDAC decided they wanted it back. Then they remembered why they got rid of it. Now it's being used by the State of Maine forestry division.  :laugh:
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

Regolith

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,171
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #13 on: July 09, 2016, 10:26:14 PM »
Heh. The other Seawolf. Cheezy video here:

http://www.seawolfamphib.com/Quality%20Amphibians%20Home%20Page.htm

Ours was one of two special builds for the Air Force with redundant everything, which made them a pain in the ass for the mechanics. The Air Force used them for some SOCOM stuff, but then decided they didn't work well for it (because they're loud and slow, especially with all the hardpoints full of drop tanks and stuff), so they gave them to us. I worked in one of them for eleven years until we lost our budget (thanks Obama your first year in office!). Then SOCOM/SORDAC decided they wanted it back. Then they remembered why they got rid of it. Now it's being used by the State of Maine forestry division.  :laugh:

Interesting. Never heard of it, and a wiki search turned up nothing. Guess not too many of them were made, especially considering the janky late-90s era website... :lol:
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. - Thomas Jefferson

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves. - William Pitt the Younger

Perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything. - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth

TommyGunn

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,956
  • Stuck in full auto since birth.
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #14 on: July 09, 2016, 10:38:00 PM »
I did not know that submarines could fly... :O
MOLON LABE   "Through ignorance of what is good and what is bad, the life of men is greatly perplexed." ~~ Cicero

MillCreek

  • Skippy The Wonder Dog
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,019
  • APS Risk Manager
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2016, 11:37:16 PM »
The Seawolf looks an awful lot like a Lake amphibian.
_____________
Regards,
MillCreek
Snohomish County, WA  USA


Quote from: Angel Eyes on August 09, 2018, 01:56:15 AM
You are one lousy risk manager.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46,260
  • I'm an Extremist!
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2016, 11:46:44 PM »
The Seawolf looks an awful lot like a Lake amphibian.

It is. Different version for gov/mil.
"I'm a foolish old man that has been drawn into a wild goose chase by a harpy in trousers and a nincompoop."

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2016, 08:15:39 AM »
Pilot error aside, if a commercial flight is inbound with an active transponder how the hell does someone at approach control not notice a five mile error in flight path?

Attention... attention jamisjockey... jamisjockey to the white courtesy phone....

Brad

At Five miles, he'd be on tower frequency.  What time of day was it?  
Landing speed of a commercial airliner is about 120-150 KIA...so that's about 2 1/2 minutes flight time.

When I was KEFD, we were 7 miles from KHOU and on several occasions aircraft tried to mistake our runways for theirs off the visual.  Landing 30 at HOU, EFD is about 2 miles off the flight path.  

This is me running visuals into IAD this week
http://archive-server.liveatc.net/kiad/KIAD-App-IADFE-Jul-08-2016-1100Z.mp3
« Last Edit: July 10, 2016, 08:52:07 AM by jamisjockey »
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2016, 08:33:03 AM »
Go to google earth and look at the orientation of the two runways.  For the pilot to hit Ellsworth Ry 15 by mistake means they were coming in from the north, and ellsworth would have been the closer of the two runways.  I bet they nosed it over and it was less than a minute of flight time taking them off their path to the runway.
The controllers probably had little time to react.  And in the tower, typical protocol is to allow an aircraft to land because it might be an emergency of some type forcing them to the wrong runway.
This one appears to be all on the pilots.
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Fly320s

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,415
  • Formerly, Arthur, King of the Britons
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2016, 08:41:37 AM »
I blame ATC.  Always and just because.
Islamic sex dolls.  Do they blow themselves up?

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2016, 08:46:16 AM »
I blame ATC.  Always and just because.
:rofl:

We had a pilot get his panties in a twist a few weeks ago because he got with a skydiving plane.  Called the facility and insisted that there be an investigation.
Well,....turns out that when the controller asked him what his on-course direct destination would be, instead of staying on the vector he was on...he turned on course which put him together with the jumpers.  Oops guess who got a PD?  :rofl:

And then there's the ASH pilot who got sent around two days in a row because the same Final trainee (not me!) ran him too tight...he rightfully called. 
FTR after 4 weeks of Finals training I have 0 go arounds.
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Devonai

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,645
  • Panic Mode Activated
    • Kyrie Devonai Publishing
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #21 on: July 10, 2016, 08:57:17 AM »
My base shares runways with BIA, so we wouldn't notice a problem until Airman Snuffy is facing down an A320 with his M4. :D
My writing blog: Kyrie Devonai Publishing

When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!

Jamisjockey

  • Booze-fueled paragon of pointless cruelty and wanton sadism
  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 26,580
  • Your mom sends me care packages
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #22 on: July 10, 2016, 09:02:05 AM »
My base shares runways with BIA, so we wouldn't notice a problem until Airman Snuffy is facing down an A320 with his M4. :D

My first tower was NYL (Yuma, AZ).  Joint use field.  We had a cessna declare a medical emergency right after he landed, said he had blood coming from his ear.  And he revealed he was flying one of the El Toro flying club aircraft, and requested to come to the military side because he was an active duty Gunny. He pulls up on the transient ramp and some dumb *expletive deleted*ck Lcpl MP yanks him out of the aircraft and prones him out.  Meanwhile, ARFF is rolling an ambulance for him.  The ARFF crew chief of the day just happened to be their OIC, a WO4.  He had the MP doing pushups on the ramp shortly thereafter.  :rofl:
JD

 The price of a lottery ticket seems to be the maximum most folks are willing to risk toward the dream of becoming a one-percenter. “Robert Hollis”

Devonai

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,645
  • Panic Mode Activated
    • Kyrie Devonai Publishing
Re: Oops, must have been a visual approach.....
« Reply #23 on: July 10, 2016, 09:06:45 AM »
If the Base Defense Operations Center (or Marine Corp equivalent) failed to inform LCpl Snuffy snoozing on the ramp that this was happening, I hesitate to point blame at him.
My writing blog: Kyrie Devonai Publishing

When in danger, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout!