Author Topic: The Can Cannon  (Read 635 times)

freakazoid

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 6,243
The Can Cannon
« on: April 22, 2016, 05:18:18 AM »
https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/can-cannons-triumphant-return/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=20160422_FridayDigest_26g&utm_campaign=/blog/can-cannons-triumphant-return/
Anybody heard about this? Sounds awesome, especially the grappling hook that they are working on. I'm confused about what the ATF thought was wrong that they had to change.
"so I ended up getting the above because I didn't want to make a whole production of sticking something between my knees and cranking. To me, the cranking on mine is pretty effortless, at least on the coarse setting. Maybe if someone has arthritis or something, it would be more difficult for them." - Ben

"I see a rager at least once a week." - brimic

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
Re:
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2016, 09:43:10 AM »
I think they added a part to prevent a round from passing. It was at one time an open hole

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

AJ Dual

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 16,162
  • Shoe Ballistics Inc.
Re: The Can Cannon
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2016, 09:49:41 AM »
https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/can-cannons-triumphant-return/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=20160422_FridayDigest_26g&utm_campaign=/blog/can-cannons-triumphant-return/
Anybody heard about this? Sounds awesome, especially the grappling hook that they are working on. I'm confused about what the ATF thought was wrong that they had to change.

The blank barrel stub inside the larger can barrel had a port on the crown as well as all the holes down the sides. Either that, or the port at the end of the "muzzle" was just closed off with a bolt or wasn't welded shut or something, which meant a live .223/5.56 could have fired from it (albeit badly) which technically made it an SBR.

So they welded the end shut or something and the ATF gave it the go-ahead.

They could have just kept selling them as-is, since uppers/barrels of any length are unrestricted, but people who owned them and put them on non NFA registered SBR AR lowers would have been in jeopardy of making unregistered SBR's.

The usual picayune stuff. Although the upside is that at least it was one of the less capricious decisions the ATF ever made, because there was at least some technical rationale behind it. And it was a pretty easy fix for X-products.  =|
I promise not to duck.

Fly320s

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 14,415
  • Formerly, Arthur, King of the Britons
Re: The Can Cannon
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2016, 12:17:07 PM »
The BATFEio had classified it as an AOW, not a SBR.  I guess because the "barrel" wasn't rifled.

Either way, it is just a part now.   =D
Islamic sex dolls.  Do they blow themselves up?