Author Topic: A legal opinion  (Read 765 times)

cassandra and sara's daddy

  • friends
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 20,781
A legal opinion
« on: December 16, 2016, 07:55:33 AM »
On trumps conflicts of interest with cites to the appropriate statutes
Makes a good read
https://www.google.com/amp/s/jonathanturley.org/2016/11/23/trump-is-legally-correct-ethics-rules-do-not-apply-to-him/amp/?client=ms-android-att-us

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
It is much more powerful to seek Truth for one's self.  Seeing and hearing that others seem to have found it can be a motivation.  With me, I was drawn because of much error and bad judgment on my part. Confronting one's own errors and bad judgment is a very life altering situation.  Confronting the errors and bad judgment of others is usually hypocrisy.


by someone older and wiser than I

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,338
Re: A legal opinion
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2016, 01:39:26 PM »
If we go back to the intentions of the Founders, any sort of law requiring a President, VP, or member of Congress to divest him/herself of all business holdings would have been unthinkable. The intention was that "serving" as any of the above was to be a temporary hiatus from life in the real world. They were supposed to take a bit of time to run the government, and then go back to doing whatever they did in the real world.

What was George Washington when he wasn't generaling or presidenting? He was a gentleman farmer, right? Would anyone suggest that during his time as President GW should have been barred from telling his workers what to plant, and when, and where?

Modern politics seems to have completely lost sight of that concept -- which is one more reason why we urgently need to establish term limits for congresscritters.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design

DittoHead

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1,574
  • Writing for the Bulwark since August 2019
Re: A legal opinion
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2016, 02:03:23 PM »
Would anyone suggest that during his time as President GW should have been barred from telling his workers what to plant, and when, and where?

Funny you should ask...
the Father of Our Country “lied, broke the law, and betrayed public trusts in pursuit of private gain.”
In the moral, catatonic stupor America finds itself in today it is only disagreement we seek, and the more virulent that disagreement, the better.

MechAg94

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 33,857
Re: A legal opinion
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2016, 03:53:01 PM »
Funny you should ask...
Interesting but a bit overblown IMO.  It would be difficult to have any assets at all and not by some perspective be accused of conflict of interest. 
“It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones.”  ― Calvin Coolidge

Hawkmoon

  • friend
  • Senior Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 27,338
Re: A legal opinion
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2016, 05:58:32 PM »
Funny you should ask...

Ummm ...

Quote
Achenbach, on the other hand, concludes, “There is remarkably little tarnish to be mined in the Washington archive.” The Patowmack Company was a labor of love for him, not an income stream. In fact, it was a money drain; he lent it $3,498 the year before he died.
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
100% Politically Incorrect by Design