http://realclimatescience.com/2016/11/noaa-september-temperature-fraud/My official "show me the data" position vis a vis global warming/climate change/whatever is "I dunno, because there is no good data to support any conclusion, and what data there is is fraudulent."
My position, when allowed to take human nature into account, my experience running physics models, and the data gleaned form the climategate data leaks is that I would not trust these grant-chasing whores with a syphillic mutt and a tube of K-Y.
The linky above helps to show why: the majority of the land mass and the overwhelming majority of the water areas are not having temperature recordings taken.
http://realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/201609_2.gifAnd while you're at it, ponder the granularity their model is using. When I was modeling the atmo for a small section of someplace geopolitically sporty, several thousand weather station readings from two points bracketing that region (a fraction the size of the climate model chunks)--for merely the summer months--were considered...adequate.
Every last bit of data and line of source code developed with taxpayer dollar assistance needs to be released under the GNU Free Documentation License.
