meh.
Loser who was never a real terrorist, released from jail, and provides a very small blip to the murder statistics of London. Who gives a *expletive deleted*it?
And I mean that not as a rhetorical. Who gives a *expletive deleted*it about this guy? Why is THIS attack the one that's leading headlines for days? What narrative is being pushed here?
Because as Muslim terrorists go, this guy was an amateur, and there's more death this week from terrorism (admittedly, the dead people are brown, but still), One could make a decent case FOR gun control from the ineffectiveness of this, but I haven't seen that yet. You could make the case to keep terrorists locked up, but this guy isn't a mastermind. Something the news people know, because while they trumpet that he was "convicted of terrorism" you have to dig to find out that he didn't do anything. His group made plans for attacks that they didn't have the wherewithal to complete, and threatened to use land in Pakistan to build a training camp they didn't have the funds to build.
This *expletive deleted*che is the Born in England version of a failure to launch that killed two people. Why do we care?
ETA: Except for the narwhal tusk attack. That *expletive deleted*it is metal as hell. I'm glad I know that that's a thing now.
