OK, let me tell you my tale of woe, and then you can chime in with suggestions.
Back in March this year, I traded my pickup truck for a 2000 Pontiac Montana minivan. The reasons for getting this vehicle were twofold:
1. It was about half as much in monthly payments as my pickup truck, and since I was facing being retired on disability from my job, that was really important;
2. It was at a height where I could basically slide sideways into the driver's seat. After two back surgeries, this was a very useful feature.
I've had to spend about $700 on a new pair of tires, a couple of electrical problems, etc. I've recently discovered that the rear shocks need replacing, which is very expensive on this vehicle, as they're part of a self-leveling suspension, and can only be replaced at the dealer (Midas and similar companies won't touch them). I also need a transmission service/overhaul/whatever. The total cost of getting this work done is going to be in the region of $1,000.
A friend has pointed out to me that I'm spending enough on maintenance to make up the difference in payments between what I was spending on my pickup (about $525 per month) and this vehicle (about $285 per month). If the maintenance bills slow down after this round, that will be fine, but if I have to continue to spend on maintenance, I'm basically deriving no advantage at all from my lower monthly purchase payments.
I have two-and-a-half years still to pay on the Montana, and owe about $2700 more than I'd get as a trade-in. However, ye olde basic regular-cab pickups (2006 GMC Sierra, or Dodge Ram, or Ford F150) are available for a total cost to me, including covering the excess owed on my trade, of approximately $19,000. On a 60-month loan, this would mean repayments of approximately $370 per month, or about $85 more than I'm paying now. Of course, being new, there would (hopefully) not be any major maintenance expenses for several years.
So, my question is this. Should I go for the new pickup, paying about $85 more per month for it than for my van, and over twice as long a period, but saving on maintenance costs? Should I stay with the minivan, accepting the higher maintenance costs, and treat them as the cost of a cheaper purchase price?
I also have to take into account that I'm never going to recover the maintenance costs on resale, as the minivan is already 6 years old, and getting older, whereas after paying off the truck, it'll be only 5 years old, and still worth a reasonable sum.
Help! Who are the car finance gurus on the forum? What would be the most cost-effective way to go, particularly considering that I'm on a disability income, which doesn't leave much to spare?